Corporate Development Hierarchy

I wanted to get people's thoughts on the differences between the roles and responsibilities of a senior analyst / associate vs. manager vs. director in corporate development. It's definitely dependent on various factors (e.g., group, company, etc.), but I'm trying to get an idea of broad, major differences. 

For example, a senior analyst / associate builds the target list, while a manager or even director manages communication with the target.

Any experience, thoughts, opinions, etc. would be highly appreciated!

 
Most Helpful

Depends on how large the team is.

Let's assume it's a generally well - staffed team with a 50/50 mix of inbound requests and outbound pipeline management:

Analyst - Pretty rare in most groups. Hard to justify having an analyst on anything that's short of a VERY well-staffed / mature Corp Dev team since even the most mundane tasks tend to be partner / client facing to some extent. You're right though, IF there is someone very junior on the team they mainly listen in, organize meetings / manage calendars, make deck edits, do pipeline / deal tracking, coordinates with various internal stakeholders, etc.

Associate - If the associate is the lowest on the totem pole they generally do what the analyst does, if they are slightly more senior they may have some additional responsibility i.e. sit in on partner meetings, ask to own 1 specific aspect of a deal and perhaps get the chance to speak to clients about it, conduct due diligence / run DD calls, etc. Basically secretarial work that leans a little more deal focused / technical.

Manager - Handles communications with targets. Oftentimes potential clients / targets / partners will reach out to these managers via something like their personal rolodex,  grad school connection, linkedin, you name it. They'll oftentimes own the relationship and ongoing work with one to a handful of clients depending on what stage the deal is at (initial exploratory phase, DD, negotiations, 1 yard line but final escalation items to be finalized, etc.) Obviously will act as delegators to their Associates but oftentimes these are ex IBD / Consulting folks and they are fully capable of deck / technical work.

Directors - Including all of the relationship work (albeit for the "bigger" or "more important" clients / partners) generally will also manage and have oversight over the full pipeline. Make final calls on deal terms, oftentimes work with strategy to align with business needs. Depending on the scope of the deal team there could be 1 director that acts as group head or many directors each owning different verticals (GAFA / FinTech / General Partnerships / M&A / etc.) all rolling up into 1 group head, who subsequently either rolls up to COO or CEO (FWIW don't pursue Corp Dev teams that roll up into the COO).

 

Very helpful thanks! Do you think some of the responsibilities you listed under Director overlap into being a VP / Head of Corp Dev? Also I think it’s fair to say managers usually handle the relationship with targets, but do they also really handle deal negotiation etc.? I feel that part would fall more to director / VP.

 

Hate to keep saying this but again it'll depend on anything from your prior exposure, the trust your team has in you, etc. I think it's fair to say there can and likely will be a considerable amount of overlap. If "director" is head of the group then its likely his directs (managers) do some deal negotiations.

If "director" is head of a vertical then likely for more of the negotiations to fall on them.

 

Who are these "clients" in CorpDev? Surely the company itself is "the client" and everyone else on a deal are service providers or acquirees?

 

Yeah you'll notice I was a little inconsistent when talking about that.

You're right that the "client" is generally the company you work for or a specific line of business of that company. Generally Corp Dev handles anything from negotiating a partnership (long or short term benefits, growth strategy for that company, vendor relationship, etc.) to strategic investments, to outright acquisitions.

As you can imagine these all take different levels of effort, diligence, and attention. You may be managing a pipeline of 5 acquisition targets but evaluating 50 possible partners in a given month, quarter, or year.

 

In my industry it has worked like this:

VP or CCDO reports deal activity to the board quarterly, talks to bankers about potential inbound monthly and discusses live deals with CEO and the lawyers almost daily.

Director (me) manages DD teams and works on portfolio, vets models, and regularly faces counterparties, either IB or partner companies. Sometimes gives input on contract language or takes part in negotiation if your VP is good and wants to give you deal exposure.

Analyst and manager are interchangeable unless you're in a huge company (rare to see analysts at all at a sub $1b cap org.) They will take on a piece of a diligence like market research or other deal model inputs, and may have some counterparty facing time but will mostly not contribute in discussions.

 

In my experience it's dependent more on the size of the group than anything. I work directly for a SVP, and there are just 2 other people in Corp Dev. We all do modeling, slides, and 'bitch work' but we generally also all have some interaction with partners executives, our C-suite, and IBs. I could see the junior people getting less exposure if there were ten of them, but probably still some if we had the deal flow to justify a dozen heads.

 

If you are lateraling from IB, what would equivalent expected positions be? ie Associate to manager, VP to Sr. Manager/Director etc

 

Totam omnis non quas impedit ut est velit. Voluptas magnam necessitatibus quis expedita debitis facere iure. Inventore qui ut doloremque incidunt quas.

Similique sint temporibus recusandae. Officia non laudantium aut excepturi autem sint quo. Quae alias qui unde expedita. Voluptas non consequuntur reprehenderit et culpa velit consectetur. Dolor iure praesentium omnis ea voluptatem.

Architecto atque quod ipsum dolorem fugit quae. Autem quasi qui voluptatem repudiandae exercitationem et et. Qui mollitia qui qui cupiditate fugit occaecati omnis.

Libero ut ea nulla in necessitatibus. Ducimus sunt suscipit porro deleniti ratione eos optio quidem. Quis est est adipisci soluta. Incidunt et rerum consequatur voluptas. Ipsum aspernatur corporis veniam rerum sit. Ut veritatis rerum reiciendis quos aut aspernatur aut. Porro dicta et quis est commodi quisquam at.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”