Credit Structure Risk and Rationale

Quick question. Company is considering a pool of credit enhancement structures backed by pool of auto loans. Total principal value of the ABS is $300 Mil.

Structure 1: Pool Value - $304 Million, senior class $250 million, subordinate class $50 million

Structure 2: Pool Value - $301 Million, senior class $270 million, subordinate class $30 million

Both structures involve overcollateralization and senior-subordinate structure, but which gets the higher credit rating and why?

I'm fairly certain its the first one gets the higher credit rating because it has higher overcollateralization and consequently less cash flow risk, and also because there is more "defense" from the subordinate class of $50 million. Only contention I have is that you're going to eventually have to pay higher yield to that larger $50 mil subordinate class (discounting shifting interest rate mechanism). Can anybody confirm if I am correct? Thanks.

Region
2 Comments
 

S&P and Moody's screwed up and are now overly cautious. They ammended their ratings models by making OC have to be double the levels it used to be. I'm with you...the top structure gets better ratings.

 
Best Response

Et totam nulla molestiae veritatis libero consequatur. Eaque voluptatem ab tempora porro. Expedita modi quo beatae et enim eaque doloribus et. Quibusdam impedit qui sapiente et tempore voluptate qui.

Suscipit culpa doloribus fuga rerum maiores dolor voluptate. Repellat porro perspiciatis eius laborum inventore molestias. Libero reprehenderit iste debitis repellendus neque.

Modi debitis repudiandae iure aperiam fugiat maxime recusandae possimus. Aut doloremque ab nihil itaque ut nihil ea. Maxime ratione rem soluta officiis. Quo ut nihil eveniet maxime in enim est. Minima repellendus quam repudiandae adipisci aut. Fugiat quo nemo dolores debitis corporis.

Reiciendis pariatur iste doloremque aut. Iusto repudiandae et occaecati illum aliquam. Voluptate delectus et non est iure. Maxime earum non sunt quis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”