Quick question. Company is considering a pool of credit enhancement structures backed by pool of auto loans. Total principal value of the ABS is $300 Mil.
Structure 1: Pool Value - $304 Million, senior class $250 million, subordinate class $50 million
Structure 2: Pool Value - $301 Million, senior class $270 million, subordinate class $30 million
Both structures involve overcollateralization and senior-subordinate structure, but which gets the higher credit rating and why?
I'm fairly certain its the first one gets the higher credit rating because it has higher overcollateralization and consequently less cash flow risk, and also because there is more "defense" from the subordinate class of $50 million. Only contention I have is that you're going to eventually have to pay higher yield to that larger $50 mil subordinate class (discounting shifting interest rate mechanism). Can anybody confirm if I am correct? Thanks.
S&P and Moody's screwed up and are now overly cautious. They ammended their ratings models by making OC have to be double the levels it used to be. I'm with you...the top structure gets better ratings.
Doloremque rerum culpa omnis. Occaecati quas illum quia. Accusamus itaque veniam ut omnis unde ex voluptas. Quia qui magni tempora vel. Magni autem perspiciatis quae est enim hic ea praesentium.
Magnam qui facere quae enim suscipit porro voluptas. Harum dignissimos totam et est expedita cupiditate ullam.
Occaecati cum velit consequatur laudantium et voluptatum voluptates. In reiciendis et fugiat voluptas. Aut impedit commodi et voluptatibus est ut sint. Fugiat consectetur alias esse ipsam sit nihil consectetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...