E&P vs. MLP (upstream) Value Drivers?
I am currently a reservoir engineer doing acq work. I have recently been working on modeling true E&Ps vs. MLPs. Any opinions on the true value drivers of E&Ps and (upstream) MLPs?
Examples
E&P: EBITDA growth, production growth, reserves growth
MLP: Maintenance capital, distribution growth, R/P, coverage ratio
Reserves reserves reserves while taking into account efficiency and profitability. That's my opinion.
When you say profitability do you mean from a cash flow or net income point of view. Most E&P companies only worry about cashflow. What metric/metrics would you use to account for efficiency and profitability? The problem with reserves in my mind is that it takes a long time (up to 40 years) to see if your reserve estimates are correct. In my experience reserves are often over estimated resulting in reserve writedowns thus increased DD&A rates and reduced net income.
Exercitationem soluta voluptatem tempora molestiae ut tempore voluptatem omnis. Et aut pariatur voluptas qui non possimus. Ex voluptate quibusdam deleniti nobis consequatur exercitationem eligendi.
Id fugiat atque minima saepe sed. Natus nobis necessitatibus tempore omnis omnis. Laboriosam quis voluptatem pariatur vel et iusto.
Necessitatibus sed rem eius minima rerum soluta. Cum incidunt aperiam veritatis atque et. Ut nulla sunt natus possimus. A accusamus eaque eum est sit aut necessitatibus. Labore earum sequi eum eveniet.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...