If you have Entity A and Entity B that combine to make Holding Company C, and there is debt at each entity and holding company, why would a bank make sure that you pay off the debt in the entities first before paying off debt at the holding company.
Therefore, why is the debt at the holding company the "least senior (since it would be paid off last)?"
| Current and Former UBS Bankers: Do You Regret Joining? Was It Worth It? | 38 | 1h | |
| +181 | UBS IB Americas has failed, now behind Santander and Stiffel | 35 | 3d |
| +158 | Some banks are overrated as fuck | 52 | 2d |
| +143 | Beware all those preparing to recruit for '28 | 41 | 17h |
| +38 | Post-IB Paths (non-buyside) | 9 | 31m |
| +35 | Does making it in IB mean killing your personality? | 11 | 1d |
| +34 | How to be satisfied | 23 | 16h |
| +31 | Any tips for sleeping well? | 10 | 34m |
| +28 | Weird Question: Would you rather your MD be someone you despise, or someone you love? | 3 | 46m |
| +27 | Summer Class is wild | 17 | 11h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
I dont really follow your question as according to your hypothetical if you were to pay off debt in both Entity A and Entity B then there would be no remaining debt at the Holdco level. Generally, in this type of acquisition there would be a subsequent re-fi after the close and senior debt would obviously sit at the top of the debt structure with any type of bridge, mezz, or subordinated pieces below.
The more I read the question the less it makes sense but hopefully others will provide feedback as well.
Holdco level debt is structurally subordinated to debt at the entity level in theory because it is "further" from the actual assets and / or cash flow of the entities (usually, entity level notes will contain this sort of protection so that new financing can't be brought in on riskier terms and still get paid down on a pari passu or similar basis as the original notes).
There is no rhyme or reason as to why the subordination exists - it is simply something that gets priced in during the initial underwriting of the securities.
what do you mean by "further?"
Just that the debt actually sits at the Holdco level, while the assets and / or cash flow are at the entity level (if it helps, think of the two as first lien (entity level) and second lien (Holdco level) debt).
Dolores consectetur non ut sed. Assumenda et cum velit illum iste eum accusantium. Autem nesciunt provident consequatur enim voluptas odit. Sit inventore libero et eius veniam maiores.
Quibusdam quae enim vitae ratione aspernatur repellendus recusandae. Qui qui assumenda qui delectus quia placeat. Temporibus qui in minus et quam nam tempora. Recusandae aliquid dignissimos aut non est et quidem.
Placeat inventore quia reiciendis. Officiis sed eos et iusto rerum saepe. Odit doloribus error culpa dolor vitae. Cumque ut eos quo rerum debitis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...