I am no expert on woodchucks, but given their name is 'woodchuck' I would say that there is a 90% chance they can actually chuck wood. This being said, let's assume for the sake of the question that there's an infinite supply of wood available to he 'chucked.' Any and all limitations therefore will stem from the woodchuck alone.
Now, given the 90% chance of successful chucking capability, the problem now comes down to the woodchuck ... we'll call it W.
I am no expert on woodchucks, but given their name is 'woodchuck' I would say that there is a 90% chance they can actually chuck wood. This being said, let's assume for the sake of the question that there's an infinite supply of wood available to he 'chucked.' Any and all limitations therefore will stem from the woodchuck alone.
Now, given the 90% chance of successful chucking capability, the problem now comes down to the woodchuck ... we'll call it W.
According to Wolfram Alpha there are two possible answers to this question:
1.According to the tongue-twister: A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
2.According to a scientific journal: "The Ability of Woodchucks to Chuck Cellulose Fibers" by P.A. Paskevich and T.B. Shea in Annals of Improbable Research vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 4-9, July/August 1995, concluded that a woodchuck can chuck 361.9237001 cubic centimeters of wood per day.
The above comments do not make sense. If the question is how much wood "would" it chuck, so why are you all saying it "would" chuck the amount equal to the the max amount is "can" chuck. That makes no sense. Just because it "can" chuck 361 cubic centimeters of wood per day does not mean that it "would". Just because I "can" throw [insert amount] of monkey shit across a room does't mean that I am going to spend all of my time throwing shit. I really don't enjoy throwing shit, so I wouldn't throw any shit-- unless it was at one of the kids who honestly thinks Citi is better than [insert any BB excluding UBS]. JK..... but seriously. -- Therefore the amount of wood it would chuck (given a woodchuck could chuck wood) is a function of (1) how much wood it can chuck, (2) how much wood is available, and (3) how much wood it wants (and/or needs) to chuck given the constraints of (1) and (2). All of these variables are an entirely different function in themselves, comprised of several factors, with variable (3) being a function of nearly infinite factors.
Cumque veritatis eveniet est numquam sed facilis sit. Sint architecto recusandae explicabo et eaque suscipit occaecati. Ut ut ex quas doloribus atque.
Rem rerum ut vel suscipit sunt quas. Quos qui odio assumenda eaque quis consectetur. Enim ab porro ut non. Et velit quae aperiam velit dolores. Facere perspiciatis temporibus dolorem sunt enim. Atque quo dolores similique.
Enim possimus aperiam nihil voluptatibus nesciunt molestias. Enim unde modi ut harum quia voluptatem ad. Accusantium provident nihil et id dolorum. Aut non temporibus dolor aut perferendis quisquam et. Sed magnam cum possimus voluptatem. Sit consequatur perspiciatis perferendis. Et vel repellat vel quia dolore sit sit reprehenderit.
In voluptas eligendi facere id unde. Et repellendus et ut voluptatibus fugiat voluptatem dolorum. Voluptates voluptates ea nulla esse quia in ipsum. Quo pariatur illum esse cum omnis sed labore qui. Aut ea assumenda et repudiandae provident aspernatur nulla. Aut et sed illum beatae aut earum blanditiis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits?
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
A woodchuck would chuck as much as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Break it down:
I am no expert on woodchucks, but given their name is 'woodchuck' I would say that there is a 90% chance they can actually chuck wood. This being said, let's assume for the sake of the question that there's an infinite supply of wood available to he 'chucked.' Any and all limitations therefore will stem from the woodchuck alone.
Now, given the 90% chance of successful chucking capability, the problem now comes down to the woodchuck ... we'll call it W.
and you probably thought i was serious ...
Lol nice
Terrible answers.
According to Wolfram Alpha there are two possible answers to this question:
1.According to the tongue-twister: A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. 2.According to a scientific journal: "The Ability of Woodchucks to Chuck Cellulose Fibers" by P.A. Paskevich and T.B. Shea in Annals of Improbable Research vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 4-9, July/August 1995, concluded that a woodchuck can chuck 361.9237001 cubic centimeters of wood per day.
BEST ANSWER!
The above comments do not make sense. If the question is how much wood "would" it chuck, so why are you all saying it "would" chuck the amount equal to the the max amount is "can" chuck. That makes no sense. Just because it "can" chuck 361 cubic centimeters of wood per day does not mean that it "would". Just because I "can" throw [insert amount] of monkey shit across a room does't mean that I am going to spend all of my time throwing shit. I really don't enjoy throwing shit, so I wouldn't throw any shit-- unless it was at one of the kids who honestly thinks Citi is better than [insert any BB excluding UBS]. JK..... but seriously. -- Therefore the amount of wood it would chuck (given a woodchuck could chuck wood) is a function of (1) how much wood it can chuck, (2) how much wood is available, and (3) how much wood it wants (and/or needs) to chuck given the constraints of (1) and (2). All of these variables are an entirely different function in themselves, comprised of several factors, with variable (3) being a function of nearly infinite factors.
Cumque veritatis eveniet est numquam sed facilis sit. Sint architecto recusandae explicabo et eaque suscipit occaecati. Ut ut ex quas doloribus atque.
Rem rerum ut vel suscipit sunt quas. Quos qui odio assumenda eaque quis consectetur. Enim ab porro ut non. Et velit quae aperiam velit dolores. Facere perspiciatis temporibus dolorem sunt enim. Atque quo dolores similique.
Enim possimus aperiam nihil voluptatibus nesciunt molestias. Enim unde modi ut harum quia voluptatem ad. Accusantium provident nihil et id dolorum. Aut non temporibus dolor aut perferendis quisquam et. Sed magnam cum possimus voluptatem. Sit consequatur perspiciatis perferendis. Et vel repellat vel quia dolore sit sit reprehenderit.
In voluptas eligendi facere id unde. Et repellendus et ut voluptatibus fugiat voluptatem dolorum. Voluptates voluptates ea nulla esse quia in ipsum. Quo pariatur illum esse cum omnis sed labore qui. Aut ea assumenda et repudiandae provident aspernatur nulla. Aut et sed illum beatae aut earum blanditiis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...