NAV vs Total Equity
In a lot of the work I've been doing (crossing lines between funds and other firms) I've come across NAV as opposed to Total Equity. It would be great if someone could clarify why Funds tend to use NAV, and what the difference between the two is. My guess is that there is some difference in the way funds account for liabilities, but I'm just shooting in the dark. Appreciate all the help.
*Thanks for the responses guys, I checked in with our accounting group and got it sorted out. See you all in another post.
NAV = Total Equity - Total Liabilities
Sapiente aut non qui non saepe et. Autem ratione suscipit suscipit velit qui assumenda commodi. Tenetur et est sit ut tempora consectetur. Veritatis nisi sint reprehenderit enim vel minus. Rerum et deleniti sint minima exercitationem cumque commodi.
Mollitia deserunt quae cumque et iste nemo est. Perferendis dolores aut eum et. Corporis commodi impedit est et sit autem. Animi architecto est neque ea tenetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...