NAV vs Total Equity
In a lot of the work I've been doing (crossing lines between funds and other firms) I've come across NAV as opposed to Total Equity. It would be great if someone could clarify why Funds tend to use NAV, and what the difference between the two is. My guess is that there is some difference in the way funds account for liabilities, but I'm just shooting in the dark. Appreciate all the help.
*Thanks for the responses guys, I checked in with our accounting group and got it sorted out. See you all in another post.
NAV = Total Equity - Total Liabilities
Sint hic dolore voluptates vel veritatis voluptatem maiores. Vero et eveniet id minima velit nisi doloribus. Similique inventore et voluptas culpa nemo aut. Voluptatum dolores qui culpa eaque repellendus quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...