Technicality in EV

Guys,

Can someone explain to me what's wrong with this reasoning? I can't find an ironclad argument against it and that bothers me...

January: Value a company X, knowing it's Business plan and net debt. You get an EV and Eq. V.
February 1st: Raise debt, get cash to fund business plan. EV and Eq. V don't change.
February 2nd: Spend cash on CapEx according to the business plan. EV stays the same (future cash flows don't change), hence Eq. Value should decrease to make up for the increase in net debt.

Investments are NPV-positive.

Basically, as we go along the scheduled business, equity value would be decreasing. I could be wrong but I don't think the Eq. V. should not suffer from simply following the business plan although the new assets haven't generated earnings yet. Where am I wrong?

I'd say that it's not comparing apples to apples because one cannot take a business plan and balance sheet at different dates, but then if I do another valuation on February 2nd, the business plan won't have changed. Simply made up for by the discount factor?

Feeling dumb about it but would rather be here than in front of my boss. Thanks

(edited to say that it's too early for the assets to generate earnings)

5 Comments
 

Nevermind I figured it out.

On February 2nd, when you've just spent the new cash on CapEx, your EV doesn't stay the same but actually increases by that much, which cancels out the increase on debt on the other side. Thus Equity Value doesn't change.

EV increases because future capex are reduced by the amount of the investment, which in turns augments FCF_0

 
nonos

Nevermind I figured it out.

On February 2nd, when you've just spent the new cash on CapEx, your EV doesn't stay the same but actually increases by that much, which cancels out the increase on debt on the other side. Thus Equity Value doesn't change.

EV increases because future capex are reduced by the amount of the investment, which in turns augments FCF_0

yea consider capex as a purchase of pp&e, then your operating assets (EV) will increase.

 
Best Response

Error iure similique ut nulla totam qui doloremque. Est consequuntur voluptatum dolor nulla modi quae.

Tempore aut quos minus id dicta. Voluptatem voluptas architecto sunt ut itaque provident eius illo. Quia et et et veniam rem quia. Commodi quia omnis beatae est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”