Underpaid even @ 7 figures??
So a buddy of mine works at a L/S fund that was up well over 30% last year. Over $5bn AUM, and only like 10-20 IPs. It's a name brand fund a lot of you would know. He's been there for over 4 years, and he made $1.5mm. For a "relatively senior" analyst to only make 1.5 bucks, seems kinda low for this situation, no? I've heard of 3rd year analysts making like double that last year. Dont get me wrong, that's a shit ton of money, just seems like he was underpaid. And he came up with good ideas and did good work, so were not talking about some nutjob here. Bright guy. Maybe explains why he never wants to go out anymore, feel bad.
What do you guys think fair comp should have been? For context, he did $1-1.2mm the year before and the fund was up like 15% or something lower than that...
From the info you provided I’m not sure if there is enough to know what is fair comp. I think there are people who make careers out of figuring out what is fair comp
Probably depends a lot on his perceived contribution to pnl, no? I heard management at smaller funds often pay you based on the value they believe you add.
Everyone was up last year lol
Hard to tell with the info you provided.
Things to consider: PnL contribution, seniority of others in fund (including partners and their cut), contract (what terms did they agree to?), hurdle (probably not at a L/S), fee structure at fund (are the actually collecting 2/20?), etc
Hard to tell if this person is a “relatively senior analyst” with 4 yrs. Hate doing this math, but with 20 investment professionals, 30% return ($1.5bln), 2/20 fees you have $300mm split among everyone.
Why do you care what he makes?
If he’s questioning he is underpaid he probably is. But most people pause at the second question, can he achieve the same success elsewhere...
Remember he is not alone everyone at the fund thinks, year1 15% was x, year2 30% was 2x. It could be year3 is 8%, and he gets .8x. He just has not seen year3 yet...
thing is, even if he's underpaid unless he's an absolute rockstar it is going to be quite difficult finding a sustainable seat where he can pull 3-4 million (again, unless he's a total rockstar).
You could argue that a guy making 8-figures at a fund with $5B AUM and a 30% return is underpaid. You could equivalently make an argument that the return was luck.
Wonder what’s the name of this place..
Better off saying he's undercompensated, not underpaid.
Stfu
edit: seriously. Stfu
Yes, that is how capitalism works. Capital, not labor captures the vast majority of profits of a business. Has your friend quit his job over his compensation? Demanded a bigger cut? What incentive do the owners of capital (partners) have to give labor (your friend) a cent more than they need to retain him or someone else with equivalent value-add?
I'm not a communist / socialist but it's always hilarious to me when the people who ardently defend (and benefit heavily most from) capitalism suddenly see its flaws when it negatively affects them or someone they know.
This is such a strange post. How did you go from a guy making $1.5m/year that thinks he’s underpaid and turn that into a criticism of capitalism? If making $1.5m and feeling underpaid is the biggest criticism of capitalism then I’ll take that every day of the week. Better than being socialist and hungry.
Like really though what was your point in writing that?
Here, let me spell it out for you: OP's friend (labor) believes he delivered significantly more than $1.5mm of value to the company he works at. Unfortunately for him, capital reap the vast majority of the profits in the current system. In that system, he is *not* underpaid - he's being paid exactly what his value is to the owners of capital, rather than the value he's generated for the firm.
Either OP's friend is underpaid and being harmed by a system that is too heavily tilted in favor of capital (vs labor), or he is being paid exactly the right wage and has no right to complain. This post only makes sense as a critique against capitalism (albeit inadvertently).
Again, I'm not a communist or socialist - I'm a firm believer in capitalism. I just think it's funny when people who most likely will shut down any dialogue by lower earners to get better compensated for their value (i.e. blue collar workers or retail workers) suddenly have some sort of epiphany about the relationship between labor and capital in this country when they feel they themselves are undercompensated.
Anyone working at a high finance shop making seven figures is a massive beneficiary of the capitalist system. They literally are skimming off the capital. This person would be making much less for the same job in a true communist or socialists state (where they would likely be working for a government entity performing the same function).
It doesn't matter whether you think you're underpaid. It only matters whether there's another company that would pay you more. If there is a higher offer, then yes, you're underpaid and go take that other job (or use that offer as leverage with your current boss). But if there's no higher offer, then you're already making the maximum possible, so how can you say you're underpaid?
Yup - if his is friend can't leverage his value for higher pay or lateral to another fund that will properly compensate him, him being underpaid only makes sense from the perspective of labor theory of value - which is a Marxist idea. Under capitalism, he is being paid literally exactly the amount he should be.
Yes. He is underpaid.
hard to say what is fair without knowing terms of his comp structure, but overall seems somewhat underpaid. would've expected $2-4mm. $1.5mm is max 60-70bps of the incentive fees, assuming $5b aum, 30% returns, and 15% performance fees. simplifying the math obviously.
Alias quas in qui nesciunt labore et quidem tenetur. Quis aut sint voluptatem qui. Ea aperiam cum eos at.
Harum et minus placeat ut eligendi laboriosam laudantium. Error sunt omnis accusantium at explicabo. Quam itaque et explicabo aliquid aut perferendis. Consequuntur dicta iste qui quia odit quia. Distinctio et mollitia modi consequatur et qui consequatur. Incidunt exercitationem reprehenderit suscipit natus. Nemo in modi omnis explicabo perspiciatis qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Id doloremque fugit aut sint. Voluptatem cupiditate est nulla porro.
Explicabo dolorem quia ea reiciendis dolorum dolores quia. Est in et optio incidunt consequatur aut consequatur adipisci. Et eum qui non quisquam perferendis. Non officia illo cupiditate eum a.
Et in voluptate est autem dolorem nemo ut. Soluta qui nihil ex fugiat et molestiae. Vel et quaerat accusantium occaecati velit. Aspernatur aut deserunt quia ipsum.