Same thing which I have always been wondering Ziggy. From my conversations with other 1st/2nd year analysts, most of them are focused on churning out the pitch books, while associates are the ones creating and running the valuation models.

Anyone inputs would be much appreciated.

 

So what kind of valuation models do associates use?

I'm just trying to understand that first year analysts and then associates are putting in 80 or 90 hours week, but what are they actually doing? My elder brother is in S&T at a second tier I-Bank. He puts in on avg. 50 to 60 hours a week.

However, he tells me I-Bankers ( the one I call true I-Bankers are the M&A and equity/debt underwriters) put in at least 80 hours a week. I just want to know doing what?

If anything, the quantative models used by S&T are quite complicated. Also, from what I know, a lot of I-Bankers have been history majors (point being that the work requires more dedication instead of technical/quantative skills).

So what are those 80 hous spent doing?

 
Best Response

Everyone from the VP-down is responsible for the pitch book... so as an analyst, you've got changes to be heard from your associate, your VP, and when you think you have a finished product, the MD (who may or may not tear your work apart). In banking, when there is time between now and the client meeting, this creates multiple iterations and revs, meaning you'll constantly be doing market updates for charts, tweaking small nits, adjusting the model for assumptions, etc.

From a modeling standpoint, the VP usually has an idea for the model and passes it down to the associate, who breaks it down for the analyst to build. After the analyst builds it, a good associate will get into the model and sanity check everything to make sure it's working right and that they're thinking about the valuation / issue correctly. A bad associate will assume the monkey's work is fine to have the team discover an extreme error in the model several hours before the client meeting. Brilliant!

So to sum it up, the hours your working are mainly due to the fact that you have so many iterations and nits in a book that you have to fix, and so many people to hear changes from. A lot of the hours stack up because it takes a while to hear back from people, so you gotta sit at your desk waiting to find out what it is you need to do. When things are really busy, though, and deal flow is good, you won't have that problem... you'll probably just switch gears and work on another project with another neurotic VP breathing down your neck. Fun stuff!

 

Thanks FreeCashFool,

I appreciate the feedback. That clears up a lot for me.

Since its mostly assignment based work, on average how many projects/assignments is an analyst working on. 2, 3 or more. (So that way, while an analyst is waiting to hear from his/her colleagues on one assignment's work, they would be working on others and, thus, they are always busy.)

Is that correct?

 

yes, an analyst will always be on more than just a few teams. sometimes you'll be on a client service team that just never dies, and is as annoying as hell because it's not going to amount to anything but the client keeps wanting new valuations and crap... pure retardation

i'd say on average an analyst will be on 5-6 teams, but typically only 2-3 require full-throttle (if that). the bad days happen when you get demands from multiple assoc's/vp's... while you can manage expectations and have them duke it out between the two, you still have to get it done.

for what it's worth, i'm only familiar with one staffing model at one BB, so i don't know how things operate elsewhere.

 

Excepturi est quia voluptatem eius a. Necessitatibus optio beatae autem. Consequatur sed nesciunt error et. Et aut ad eius autem officiis voluptas eveniet. Impedit quas quis quo dignissimos dolorem nostrum voluptate tempora. Vel facilis ad recusandae qui. Iure quod qui blanditiis fugiat deserunt.

Voluptatem quisquam ut suscipit aut quasi. Veniam atque minima rem qui nulla et reiciendis commodi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (85) $262
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (65) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (198) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
pudding's picture
pudding
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”