Why do valuations focus on the core operations of a business?

This might seem pretty basic but I am still trying to wrap my head this. In a DCF, for example, we use unlevered free cash flow. UFCF normalizes for different capital structure, different D&A schedules, different tax rates, and (I guess this one is depending on the person doing the valuation/calculating UFCF) non-recurring items. Why though? What's the point? If anyone knows the reasoning on this, I'd love to hear it.

 
Best Response

You can't compare companies with different leverage ratios, coverage ratios, working capital requirements, cap ex purchases, litigation fees, etc.

You can compare them more closely if you take these confounding factors out and only look at core business operations. By looking at specific capital structure-neutral cash flows attributable to the business we're able to actually see what each company is making or losing, in cash, and in a comparable format.

If that's still confusing consider Company A with 150 in earnings and 50 in interest expense, and Company B with 175 in earnings and 25 in interest expense. B pays out more money to shareholders but both have an EBIT of 200 (for the purposes of this example), and so the FCF would be the same given the same D&A, cap ex, WC, etc.

FCF is concerned with the amount of money a company produces before there is any payout to any type of investor, debt, equity, or otherwise.

 

Aut odio vitae aut non assumenda. Nam quam accusantium accusantium ea molestias. Dolore nobis cupiditate sit rem harum. Fugiat quas consequatur nihil est quibusdam.

Quibusdam quaerat doloribus sit. Id ratione facere doloremque vitae in voluptas aliquid. Nam quis aut voluptas accusantium id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”