Nordic Model

What is the Nordic Model?

The Nordic Model is the combination of social systems, welfare systems, and economic systems adopted by the Nordic countries.  

It combines the features of capitalism, such as economic efficiency and market economy, with the help of social benefits such as state pensions and income distribution.

This model came to be known as the Scandinavian Model, and it is most commonly associated with the countries of Scandinavia: Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway, and Iceland.

To capture the unique amalgamation of free-market capitalism and social benefits that give rise to a society enjoying free services, high-quality education, healthcare systems, and guaranteed pension payments for retirees, they created the Nordic Model.

For the benefit of all the citizens, funds are given by taxpaying citizens and administered by the government. Therefore, the citizens completely trust their government and have a history of cooperating to reach compromises through democratic procedures.

The policymakers of this government have chosen a mixed economic system that reduces the gap between the rich and the poor through a robust public sector and a progressive taxation scheme while preserving the benefits of capitalism.

The capitalist economy controls this model and encourages creative destruction. The institutions and laws support companies' ability to shed workers and implement innovative business models. Various social welfare programs also support employees.

This model developed in the 1930s under the leadership of social leaders, but it started to gain attention after World War II.

The three Scandinavian countries are constitutional monarchies, while Finland and Iceland have been republics since the 20th century. Over the last few decades, this model has advanced in some ways, such as deregulation and expanding the privatization of public services.

However, compared with the other models, this model is still distinguished due to its strong emphasis on social investments and public services.

As a result, this system treats all citizens equally, encouraging participation in the workforce. In addition, the hallmark trait of this culture is gender equality, which results in a high level of workplace participation by women and a high level of parental engagement by men.

Understanding the Nordic Model

The Nordic Model embraces globalization and the welfare state— the government viewed these two approaches as opposites. 

The main aspects of this model include public access to social services funded by taxpaying citizens, investments in healthcare, education, and other social services associated with capitalism, social safety, and solid labor protections by unions.

There is no idea of a minimum wage as the unions decide to keep the wages high. 

This approach promotes sharing at the expense of society by expanding the use of a safety net to help workers and families adapt to the changes in the overall economy caused by the globally increased competition for food, goods, and services.

These Scandinavian economic markets have benefited from a low risk of corruption, cultural homogeneity, and freedom from politics.

We can see how the Nordic cultures have developed over the centuries from this model. The citizens of this model trust their government and have a history of working together to achieve various compromises and address problems through societal challenges.

In this model, citizens believe that public and private institutions emphasize fairness, having the citizens' best interests in mind through a general social contract.

Economic growth is required to maintain the social programs, which requires the Nordic countries to strengthen workforce participation. Therefore, the Nordic governments offer incentives for residents to work while receiving welfare payments.

Economic growth is steady, and the finance of the Nordic government is considered vital. However, this was not the case as several Nordic countries struggled with low productivity and unemployment during the 1990s.

How does the Nordic Model work? The success is credited to a combination of shared history and the development of society. The history of this model is built through a part of extensive sizeable family-driven agriculture, unlike some areas where large corporate-owned farms form.

The nation of small entrepreneurial businesses directed by the citizens is the result, all of whom confront the same set of obstacles. Solutions that benefit one member are likely to help other members too. 

This cooperative mentality helps the citizens trust their government because it creates different social welfare programs for the benefit of every citizen. Therefore, citizens will pay high taxes in exchange for the help their family members and other citizens will receive.

The active market policies reduce the conflict between labor and capital interests and can solidify this model. The Nordic countries are home to constituencies of labor markets consisting of employer associations and active labor unions. 

The Nordic countries are proud of their high union membership, ranging from 50% to 88%. There is no concept of a minimum wage in such countries as labor unions are present to ensure that the employees receive higher wages for the services offered.

The benefits are public-funded services such as healthcare and education, as these are high-quality services and private enterprises have no reason to offer or improve these services. This particular mindset remained intact till the capitalist enterprises developed.

Challenges Facing the Nordic Model

The Nordic Model is considered widely successful and a role model for other countries. However, this model subjects the several challenges that bring up the need to create some changes to make the model sustainable.

The following are the critical challenges faced by this model:

1. Tax-financed social services 

The availability of social services, such as education, healthcare, child care, and care for older people, depends on the finance funded by taxes. It means that the financing for social services depends on the citizens' income and employment.

This economic model can become unsustainable over the long term if the government does not create new ways to fund social services by generating revenues.

Generally, there is a possibility that the cumulative spending on social services will rise faster than the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Simultaneously, the tax charges levied on the citizens will increase with that of the GDP.

However, there is a significant impact on employment and growth due to the high burden of taxes and increasing taxes.

2. Aging Population

The desirable state of the economy is a significant component of younger generations of taxpayers, paired with a small population of seniors receiving pension benefits. So it's a desirable situation for the economy.

Scandinavian countries' age composition will drastically change in the coming years. The Baby Boomer Effect is the major contributor to such scenarios, as people born in the 1940s and 1950s reach retirement age.

This change results in the decline of the proportion of the working-age population while it increases the age of people above 65 years and receiving pension benefits. As a result, there will be a drastic shift between the ones contributing and those receiving benefits.

There are no corrective measures to address this imbalance. As a result, the welfare state will never be financially stable and sustainable.

Criticisms of the Nordic Model

Social Economists such as Pranab Bardhan and John Roemer criticized the Nordic-style democratic policies due to their questionable efficiency in promoting relative sustainability and egalitarianism. 

According to them, Nordic social democracy requires a strong labor union to sustain heavy labor work, arguing that it is idealistic, and countries with weaker labor movements can accomplish similar levels of redistribution.

According to them, the sustainability of social democracy is limited as it has declined in Scandinavian countries since the weakening of labor movements in the 1990s. 

According to historian Guomundur Jonsson, it is historically inaccurate to include Iceland among one of the aspects of the Nordic Model, that of consensus democracy. 

Addressing the period from 1950 to 2000, Jonsson states, "Icelandic democracy is more different than that of the traditional style and practice." There is a strained government-labor union relationship.

Secondly, Iceland does not share any Nordic tradition of corporatism or power-sharing regarding labor market policies or macroeconomic policies due to the weakness of social democrats and the left in general.

Thirdly, there is no solid legislative process.

Lastly, the political style in legislative procedures and debates is more adversarial than consensual.

In a study in 2017, economist James Heckman compared American and Danish social mobility. He found that social mobility is not that high according to the figures in Nordic countries, despite Denmark's high-income mobility.

The social mobility of Americans and Danes is quite similar. Still, Danish social mobility improves after taxes and transfers, indicating that Danish economic redistribution policies are the key drivers of greater mobility.

There is evidence that general social welfare programs can discourage the motivation of higher education due to the fall in economic benefits that college education level jobs offer and increase welfare for workers at a lower education level.

The Nordic Model vs. the U.S. System

The Nordic Model has amassed a great deal of attention from other nations. As a result, the highest taxpayers and the government fund this model to benefit all citizens.

According to many people's beliefs, they wonder if it provides a template for the smaller nations where the citizens are like-minded in terms of opinions and experiences yet live in poverty due to Marxist government policies.

According to other people's beliefs, this model serves as a template for unchecked capitalism, which has created significant income inequality and dramatic differences between the lives of the rich and poor in prosperous nations.

This model is sometimes referred to as "the third way" by sitting between the controlled economy of the Marxist regime at one end of the spectrum and, on the other hand, unchecked capitalism.

There are many ongoing pros and cons discussions regarding this model. Many people operating under what is often described as "the American model" view the Nordic model as an attractive alternative to the winner-take-all brand of capitalism. 

It has resulted in poverty, a lack of high-quality healthcare and education systems, a failing social safety net, a lack of retirement security, massive disasters in financial markets, and a significant disparity in income.

According to the critics of the American model, public programs such as education and government-run programs in America are not of high quality. The wealthy segment of society has better access to resources than poorer individuals. 

According to this, applying Nordic policies might aid in resolving these challenges. In addition, some of the world's highest tax rates support this Nordic Model.

According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), in 2019, the tax revenues as a percentage of GDP were approximately 46.3% in Denmark, 39.9% in Norway, and 42.9% in Sweden.

It compares to the 24.5% of GDP that the United States raised through taxation in 2019.

In 2018, the top personal income tax rate in Sweden was 57.3%, Denmark's was 55.8%, and Norway's was 46.6%, according to TradingEconomics.com. The tax rates in these countries are relatively high on all incomes, and not only for wealthy people.

Researched and authored by Ananya Dutta | LinkedIn

Free Resources

To continue learning and advancing your career, check out these additional helpful WSO resources:

• Currency Pair
• Exchange Rate
• Gross Domestic Product(GDP)
• Money Illusion
• Nash Equilibrium