GROWTH IS A CHOICE

Mod Note: This is a syndication from Jared's Daily Dirtnap daily market newsletter. WSO readers qualify for a $100 discount...just email [email protected] and mention "WSO Monkey Discount" You can follow Jared on twitter at @dailydirtnap

I was in Santa Fe, New Mexico recently on business. Let me tell you about Santa Fe. If I were to use a word to describe that town, I would call it a “hamlet” or “village” or something like that. I would not even call it a city. It’s not even really a town. It’s cute. It’s quaint. It’s a pretty amazing place, actually--one of the biggest art markets in the country, ensconced within this absolutely gorgeous topography and natural beauty. If I wasn’t gasping for air because of the altitude, it would be one of my favorite places, ever.

Funny thing about Santa Fe is that there are a lot of smart people and lots and lots of money. Usually when you get smart people and money together, cool things happen, like, big buildings go up, or big businesses get started. But there are no big buildings in Santa Fe. It is a village, or a hamlet.

Well, the primary reason there are no big buildings in Santa Fe is because there is a law prohibiting them. But why would somebody do something like that? I mean, don’t we all want to start awesome businesses and work in skyscrapers and get rich? Isn’t that what life is all about?

Maybe, but as it turns out, people like to compartmentalize their lives, they like to work and get rich over here, and relax over there. The rich people who call Santa Fe their home (along with the rich people who have second homes there) don’t want Santa Fe to be a bustling metropolis. They want it to stay small, and relaxing. If they want to work in an awesome business in a huge skyscraper they can always go somewhere else to do that, like New York.
But it’s not like Santa Fe is unusual, no, not at all. Santa Fe is really the rule rather than the exception. As you travel around the country, there are more places that don’t want growth than places that do want growth. It’s almost like the concept of a “free speech zone”--there are a few places, like New York, that are growth zones, with skyscrapers and all--but almost nobody else wants it. And even among growth zones, New York is special. Chicago puts up a massive fight anytime someone wants to build something. And San Francisco, forget about it. They threw a huge fit about building the Transamerica building, and now, everyone loves it as part of the skyline.

So why are so many people against growth? Why would people rather live in villages and hamlets? Not sure I have an answer to that question, except to say that growth is scary for some people. I mean, if you think about it, if you think about the progress of human civilization over centuries, here it is, the year 2013, and we have only a handful of big cities and most of the world is still unsettled nothingness. Sure, we’ve had progress, but over several generations? Not really. Most of us still live in villages and hamlets.

Growth can be tough, though, because if you don’t manage it properly, it can be not very aesthetically pleasing. In particular, I am thinking of Myrtle Beach, with its haphazard zoning laws. Being a free market/freedom sort of guy, I have a difficult time reconciling many aspects of zoning laws with my personal philosophy of life, but if I am being honest with myself, I will say that I enjoy places with good zoning. It’s easy to find incompetents in local government who will allow anything to be built, and it’s easy to find incompetents in local government who will allow nothing to be built, but it’s hard to find smart people in local government who will seek the highest rate of economic growth possible, while doing it in an organized and well-thought-out fashion.

I think most of all, though, people just fear change. Change is scary to human beings. Where I grew up, in Connecticut, there were plans to put a couple of baseball fields near the reservoir across the street from my house. Predictably, lots of people made a stink about it, about the traffic and the this and the that, and it turned out to be nothing. I don’t think they even use those fields anymore. I think they’re just there for vandals.

The same applies for business owners. Growth is scary. You have a restaurant, people like it, it makes money--you could make twice or three times as much money if you opened up additional restaurants, and turned into a chain, but why do it? What a hassle. It’s a big enough hassle running one restaurant, I can’t imagine running three. So even people who are risk takers who take risks and open a business, usually become complacent and unwilling to take even more risks. Rare is the person who just keeps pushing the envelope.
I’ve written about this before; this is why I really like New York, because New York is just not nostalgic about anything. Old building standing in the way? Nuke it, tear it down, start over, build something three times the size. I mean, look at Yankee Stadium. They nuked the old Yankee Stadium, with a century of baseball history, and built a gaudy monstrosity. Would they ever do that with Wrigley Field? NOT A CHANCE.

I don’t think there’s any magic formula to growth at all. Either you want it or you don’t. We get tangled up in all this social engineering about tax rates and incentives and disincentives, and what it really comes down to is this: are people in the mood to build things, or not? In Santa Fe, they are not, and that makes them happy. Not a knock on Santa Fe, it’s an amazing place and probably people don’t want to shop for expensive art in between an Isuzu dealership and a Golden Corral. But what really gets me down is when some village or hamlet is working to undermine some guy’s proposal to build a building/business/hotel/whatever when it is clear that the town really needs it, just because growth is scary and new things are scary and change is scary. Someone sent me a quote yesterday, and I’m paraphrasing: change is constant, and it is your job to adapt to it.

I think our job as investors is to look around the country, and especially the world, for those pockets of humanity where people are not afraid of growth. China is certainly not afraid of growth. Brazil is not afraid of growth. You know, for as much as people have been beating up the EM countries over the last year, it’s important to remember that Brazil, China, etc. actually want to grow, where the U.S., and especially Europe, really do not. People seem surprised when Europe turns in 0% GDP growth every quarter, but I’m not really sure why. More than any place in the world, people really like things to stay the same in Europe. As a society, it is important for us to stay hungry. Or not, I guess. Maybe we have all made enough money, and we can sit back and relax. Forget about the solar power and the electric cars and the hyperloops and the spaceships. We have one more season of Game of Thrones.

 
Best Response

I'm curious to know how you think Europe has become complacent with growth? On the contrary, I typically think of Europe on the cutting edge of medical, educational, engineering, and social progress. Maybe their environment is not as conducive to business or industry as the US or China, but I hardly think that this element restricts their overall progress.

Perhaps there needs to be a distinction between progress and growth (even different kinds of growth)?

I come from a community that very much identifies itself with the Santa Fe that you described. I'm not familiar with its zoning laws, but my town experienced huge growth leading up to 2008 and continues to do so. Most people weren't apprehensive of the growth itself, however the sentiment seemed to be that the commercialization of our local "culture" commoditized what was special about it. The influx of shopping malls, outlets, Holiday Inns, and Outback Steakhouses diluted the very reason that most people went their in the first place, to escape all of that. I personally think it refreshing that a community is willing to forgo growth and wealth in order to preserve their local culture and heritage. Again, I think that their is a distinction in the kinds of growth that you are arguing for.

People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for freedom of thought which they seldom use.
 

My entire country is a wasteland because we have choked off all growth with a maze of incomprehensible laws and regulations. We produce nothing (in the giant scheme of things) and whatever we do, we dump it into social engineering and redistribution which also fails on a scale so epic you have to see it to believe it. So no, I have no sympathy for those who don't want growth. If you don't want it,fine. At least get out of the way for others.

 

I think you made some excellent points...What I find fascinating is going back to your baseball field example, it was most likely .01% of your town's population raising concerns. The other 99.9% were on board with the idea, they just had Thrones episodes to watch and it didn't affect them. Therefore they just went about their business. When the consensus is to maintain the status quo then I think towns like Santa Fe are awesome. I have issues when the majority of a town wants to grow, but doesn't have the ambition to put the other 10% in their place.

 

If I had a silver banana, you would get one.

You spoke the truth regarding the restaurant example. I'm going to forward this to a person I know who can benefit from this article. Hopefully he will see his rube like thinking and grow his business as it agitates me when this person is sitting on a cash cow of a restaurant and does nothing to grow it.

 

I support growth as long as it is environmentally sustainable. If we are going to grow economically (have more money in our bank accounts, but breath dirtier air and eat contaminated food) there is really no purpose, its like suicide. If growth helps people become happier, healthier, safer, go for it, if we are going to jeopardize our health for green paper which we cant breath, it makes no sense.

 

Hic cupiditate minima facilis molestias. Consequatur adipisci aliquid iure eius molestiae. Voluptas sit illo quidem facere. Omnis ab itaque tempore voluptates ut sit veniam. Dignissimos aut quia non nulla incidunt voluptatem.

Assumenda labore atque sint tempora dicta. Cum et animi hic dolorum nam soluta ad. Ut necessitatibus omnis deleniti et. Perferendis ea facere ut amet sint. Corporis sunt non in quas enim perspiciatis. Sunt totam qui ad eum et et voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”