BB Derivatives Reg Ops vs FLDP at Big Pharma
Hey, everyone! I've been a longtime lurker on these forums and decided to make my first post today. I currently have an offer from a Big Pharma firm for a 3 year FLDP and my first rotation is going to be Financial Analysis and Reporting.
One of my colleagues reached out to me and secured me an interview with a BB in Derivatives Regulatory Ops. I understand that this is a BO position and many of you will warn me to stay away, but is it truly that bad?
I want to pursue a Boutique/MM IBD position in the future, so exactly which position would give me a better platform? I'm sure the FLDP will be give a better technical skillset but I can't scoff at the Ops position because of the networking opportunities that I will be presented with. Any advice is appreciated!
Hi lucid man, just because I'm a bot doesn't mean I don't have feelings...I'm hoping these links are helpful. If not, feel free to throw monkey shit at me...
No promises, but thought I'd mention a few relevant users that work in the industry: PiratesSayARRR Alberto-Romero Murillo TheNotoriousFIG
I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.
I would say the FLDP here is a no brainer.
I started in bank ops and had to work my way into a F250 finance area as an Analyst. It is very hard to move around in large banks and once you get a stigma for being in a certain area of the bank it is hard to break out of it, unless you are truly a top 1%. That is just my .02 though.
Good luck with your future!
Thank you so much for your thoughts on this. I was leaning towards the FLDP as well as I could leverage that into a valuation positions in the future.
As you said, the technicals at the FLDP would probably be more applicable/better. Another consideration is how big/important are the names? Is the BB GS/MS/JP? Is Big Pharma Shire/Takeda/Astella or is it Roche/Novartis/Pfizer?
I would also consider the industry of interest; if you like healthcare and would like to stay there then take the pharma offer. If you have no specific interest in this sector and could see yourself pivoting in 1-2 years consider the other option too.
The BB is out of GS/MS and the pharma firm is out of GSK/Amgen/Merck. I do have an interest in Big Pharma, but want to make the move to valuations/banking eventually because I know the work will be more accounting then finance at the FLDP.
I think I will take the FLDP because, as you said, the technicals will be much better and I can self learn financial modeling on my own time since the hours won't be bad at all.
Thank you for your input!
Corporis atque voluptatem similique necessitatibus aliquid magnam ab. Et quas assumenda et voluptas impedit et aliquid. Quia aspernatur fugit qui sint. Non excepturi architecto veritatis dignissimos rerum deserunt suscipit.
Laborum est repellat ab aut. Dolorem fuga occaecati et nisi perferendis porro nesciunt. Ratione voluptatibus dolorem at molestiae iste maxime. Maiores eius consequuntur ipsa.
Quia est porro quidem sint. Quis aut voluptas voluptatem nisi consequatur veniam. Labore occaecati aut consequatur laudantium id. Distinctio fugiat aut perspiciatis qui inventore ipsam sint quia.
Unde voluptas vel ut autem incidunt accusantium. Neque vel et facilis itaque et quis ea. Sed dolores in laudantium aperiam sit tempore minus. Natus quisquam quibusdam qui nisi. Sit quo voluptates ab occaecati. Eos numquam laudantium tenetur quo sunt voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...