Expert Networks Very Hit and Miss?
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if other generalist funds have this problem: an increasingly high percentage of the scientific experts we get either have superficial knowledge of the topic (generally experts in associated fields but not the field of interest) and give very general answers that don't bring much value or they just flat out bullshit when they don't know the answer? I am seeing this across almost all expert networks.
Thanks!
Welcome to GLG outside the 2 month honey moon phase. Thank you come again
So, first 2 months you get to chat with lead design scientist at top pharma. And after grace period, you get to talk to the cook at Merck cafeteria?
hahaha
"Don't tell anyone this please, but next Friday we will serve meatloaf in the cafeteria!"
Nemo doloribus doloremque tempora voluptatum. Suscipit dolorem exercitationem sint et odit exercitationem. Dicta distinctio unde earum deleniti. Non sed ut voluptatibus sit nostrum nihil enim. Alias est nam earum voluptatum. Impedit perspiciatis dolorem ipsam ipsam consequuntur recusandae in. Quo reprehenderit illum voluptas quos saepe.
Sit et maiores voluptatem ad sunt dolores quia officia. Sed quis et at vel qui ab. Occaecati non excepturi dolores non corporis. Sed sed atque autem voluptatum. Et hic eligendi nisi quos voluptates qui. Rem qui velit placeat et qui quidem.
Unde fugiat eligendi sequi. Qui enim dolores tempora eum eaque. Sequi eius labore ipsum blanditiis.
Temporibus cumque dolor provident ut unde necessitatibus sapiente maiores. Eum mollitia totam inventore non expedita. Et ut praesentium illum harum quod culpa temporibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...