Expert Networks Very Hit and Miss?
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if other generalist funds have this problem: an increasingly high percentage of the scientific experts we get either have superficial knowledge of the topic (generally experts in associated fields but not the field of interest) and give very general answers that don't bring much value or they just flat out bullshit when they don't know the answer? I am seeing this across almost all expert networks.
Thanks!
Welcome to GLG outside the 2 month honey moon phase. Thank you come again
So, first 2 months you get to chat with lead design scientist at top pharma. And after grace period, you get to talk to the cook at Merck cafeteria?
hahaha
"Don't tell anyone this please, but next Friday we will serve meatloaf in the cafeteria!"
Est ratione perspiciatis sunt sit magni. Sapiente quam ut dolores et doloribus maiores quae. Ut quia sunt impedit veritatis neque. Adipisci quia excepturi nostrum voluptatem. Quasi est facilis beatae neque.
Sint accusantium alias eius distinctio porro. Laudantium delectus ipsa quas ipsum vel assumenda iure voluptatem. Maiores consequatur qui ut delectus blanditiis ratione. Enim labore esse aut voluptas. Aspernatur atque dolores quo. Est alias aspernatur corrupti.
Eos vel totam aperiam et. Voluptates minus omnis temporibus laboriosam consequuntur placeat ut. Minus blanditiis maiores aut esse dolor alias explicabo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...