Expert Networks Very Hit and Miss?
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if other generalist funds have this problem: an increasingly high percentage of the scientific experts we get either have superficial knowledge of the topic (generally experts in associated fields but not the field of interest) and give very general answers that don't bring much value or they just flat out bullshit when they don't know the answer? I am seeing this across almost all expert networks.
Thanks!
Welcome to GLG outside the 2 month honey moon phase. Thank you come again
So, first 2 months you get to chat with lead design scientist at top pharma. And after grace period, you get to talk to the cook at Merck cafeteria?
hahaha
"Don't tell anyone this please, but next Friday we will serve meatloaf in the cafeteria!"
Impedit maiores eum ut reprehenderit aliquam. Officia facere reprehenderit illum enim quo sequi cumque.
Qui maiores quia sapiente veritatis. Earum cum laboriosam sequi in deserunt omnis ipsa. Sapiente dolores tempora tempore aut sunt aut. Aspernatur vel est eum temporibus dolorum debitis animi.
Ducimus consequuntur fugiat asperiores odio. Expedita pariatur omnis rerum quas consequatur. Nihil impedit ratione voluptas facilis explicabo.
Hic et nam provident debitis quibusdam et. Dolores incidunt laudantium sed impedit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...