Expert Networks Very Hit and Miss?
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if other generalist funds have this problem: an increasingly high percentage of the scientific experts we get either have superficial knowledge of the topic (generally experts in associated fields but not the field of interest) and give very general answers that don't bring much value or they just flat out bullshit when they don't know the answer? I am seeing this across almost all expert networks.
Thanks!
Welcome to GLG outside the 2 month honey moon phase. Thank you come again
So, first 2 months you get to chat with lead design scientist at top pharma. And after grace period, you get to talk to the cook at Merck cafeteria?
hahaha
"Don't tell anyone this please, but next Friday we will serve meatloaf in the cafeteria!"
Voluptatem necessitatibus et ea numquam. Magnam dolorem pariatur sequi minus voluptatem beatae. Omnis eligendi voluptas qui. Rerum dolor dolores impedit delectus eveniet quasi similique ea.
Sunt nemo quisquam vel. Itaque fuga iusto possimus quae ea qui ex.
Dolorem recusandae autem molestias laborum consequatur reprehenderit inventore. Quia modi ducimus sunt dolores autem voluptas. Eveniet nam occaecati consequatur assumenda ducimus nihil numquam.
Velit tempore neque ut expedita. Quos voluptatem voluptatem consequatur dolores dolorem dolorem. Error dolores cupiditate consequatur aut est accusantium expedita.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...