FED Bailout
Hey does anyone know a sound economic reason why the bailout is structered as buying the existing debt and not as an equity infusion into the system? I haven't found any article yet giving a sound answer, and I've heard a lot of rumblings that all equity infusion would be the smarter way to go
Buying the existing debt allows banks to clear their B/S of toxic assets, which promotes confidence amongst banks and consumers so that banks can begin to lend again. The government should set up a $700B distressed debt fund that purchases these toxic assets. The problem is that no one knows what these assets are worth and every asset is completely different. Without the appropriate transparency valuation is impossible and extremely time consuming. Time is against us as confidence continues to deteriorate.
Wouldnt an equity infusion simply be pumping more liquidity into the market, which wouldnt completely solve the problem?
restoring confidence and providing transparency is essential if we're going to emerge from the credit crisis. the media 100% sensationalized - i haven't seen one news program actually explain the mechanics of the bailout.
an equity infusion wouldn't solve the questions regarding the valuation of the assets.
No the equity infusion wouldn't solve the valuation question, but what it would do is shield banks from being completely wiping out their equity base with potential write downs.
say you are MS and have 50BN of toxic stuff on or off your balance sheet. You don't like losses on it because that reduces your retained earnings. The fed props up your equity by buying a huge stake in your company. Yes, they may own a huge chunk of you for a while, but now if you losses, the Fed will absorb them.
So valuation of assets is still market determined. That's what a lot of republicans are complaining about now -- the Fed is doing a reverse auction in this debt bailout where the banks will set the bids and create inflated valuations. This will prevent losses for the banks.
In addition, the equity you acquire in the company will become valuable over time. As you slowly unload assets the value of the stock you buy will increase and can be sold at market rate to the public or back to the company.
While the banks will offer the Fed a purchase price for their toxic securities, the Fed only purchases the cheapest (i.e. if they do an auction for $50b of these securities, they will start at the bottom of the price spectrum and continue to purchase until they've spent the allocated amount).
Slowly unloading these assets isn't an option since action is required immediately to unfreeze the credit markets. The LIBOR-OIS spread reached 200 basis points a few days ago; comparatively, I believe it was at 8 basis points last July. Case and point, banks are hording their cash and even curbing overnight loans. An equity infusion would certainly provide a "crutch". It would not, however, do anything to reduce the uncertainty regarding valuation of these securities, which is at the heart of the problem.
Minus sed hic nostrum accusamus rerum deleniti. In eveniet et aut omnis ad dignissimos voluptas. Alias vel quis dolor provident eius. Iusto rerum quae iure. Deleniti ad doloribus eos est hic deleniti. Quaerat soluta natus dolor aperiam.
Harum dicta delectus ut libero nemo. Nesciunt non inventore quia aut. Temporibus possimus itaque voluptate numquam perferendis. Consequuntur ducimus sint ad nihil consequatur vitae quisquam excepturi. Vel eum cumque dicta est autem quisquam.
Ex eum distinctio aut recusandae ea aut. Aut nulla laudantium id et consequatur eveniet rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...