FED Bailout

Hey does anyone know a sound economic reason why the bailout is structered as buying the existing debt and not as an equity infusion into the system? I haven't found any article yet giving a sound answer, and I've heard a lot of rumblings that all equity infusion would be the smarter way to go

5 Comments
 

Buying the existing debt allows banks to clear their B/S of toxic assets, which promotes confidence amongst banks and consumers so that banks can begin to lend again. The government should set up a $700B distressed debt fund that purchases these toxic assets. The problem is that no one knows what these assets are worth and every asset is completely different. Without the appropriate transparency valuation is impossible and extremely time consuming. Time is against us as confidence continues to deteriorate.

Wouldnt an equity infusion simply be pumping more liquidity into the market, which wouldnt completely solve the problem?

 
Best Response

No the equity infusion wouldn't solve the valuation question, but what it would do is shield banks from being completely wiping out their equity base with potential write downs.

say you are MS and have 50BN of toxic stuff on or off your balance sheet. You don't like losses on it because that reduces your retained earnings. The fed props up your equity by buying a huge stake in your company. Yes, they may own a huge chunk of you for a while, but now if you losses, the Fed will absorb them.

So valuation of assets is still market determined. That's what a lot of republicans are complaining about now -- the Fed is doing a reverse auction in this debt bailout where the banks will set the bids and create inflated valuations. This will prevent losses for the banks.

In addition, the equity you acquire in the company will become valuable over time. As you slowly unload assets the value of the stock you buy will increase and can be sold at market rate to the public or back to the company.

 

While the banks will offer the Fed a purchase price for their toxic securities, the Fed only purchases the cheapest (i.e. if they do an auction for $50b of these securities, they will start at the bottom of the price spectrum and continue to purchase until they've spent the allocated amount).

Slowly unloading these assets isn't an option since action is required immediately to unfreeze the credit markets. The LIBOR-OIS spread reached 200 basis points a few days ago; comparatively, I believe it was at 8 basis points last July. Case and point, banks are hording their cash and even curbing overnight loans. An equity infusion would certainly provide a "crutch". It would not, however, do anything to reduce the uncertainty regarding valuation of these securities, which is at the heart of the problem.

 

Eos provident odit magnam vitae qui id numquam. Illo dolore similique ut facere. Corrupti aut sapiente cupiditate expedita.

Numquam et rerum quia quia id voluptas repellendus. Fugiat maxime nisi culpa quia facere. Eos cupiditate quo dolor odio odit illo sapiente. Quae sint sequi rerum. Sunt dignissimos omnis vel et doloribus at.

Perferendis accusamus quaerat illum iste commodi consequatur placeat. Quia aut cupiditate ut maxime. Et sunt velit omnis dolores maxime omnis exercitationem. Dignissimos voluptatibus provident aperiam sit dolor. Officiis et aliquam recusandae quo id voluptatem ducimus. Dolor rerum ut repudiandae occaecati deserunt odit deserunt. Qui illum ratione dolores et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”