Seeing Evercore Taking Low Caliber Laterals Recently

Been seeing people on LinkedIn from semi-targets/Canadian schools and low tier MM (or even regional boutiques!!) tier banks lateral into Evercore either as an analyst or A2A, really caught me off guard and made me think about how people over the past couple years were mentioning Evercore's quality being diluted from expanding headcount too much, too fast.

Does anyone have anecdotes or opinions leaning either way to provide? This is making me reconsider Evercore's status among EBs as "up there" with CVP/LAZ/PJT as they seem far more selective and exclusive, partly due to smaller headcount.

Region
 
Most Helpful

This is a very poor take. Look at them from their deal flow and fees standpoint rather than where their analysts come from. Highly elitist of you and little no to evidence of them becoming less of a prestigious bank.

 
Funniest

BigTyee777:

This is a very poor take. Look at them from their deal flow and fees standpoint rather than where their analysts come from. Highly elitist of you and little no to evidence of them becoming less of a prestigious bank.


“Making me reconsider Evercore’s status among EB’s” calm tf down intern from Canada

 

You realise your first job out of college doesn't define your whole career? What if they interviewed both LMM and BB kids but the LMM candidates impressed in interviews more.

You sound like you landed a top bank out of undergrad and think everything should be handed to you on a platter and you're above everyone else

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Remember guys this is the same fellow who said the 500 smartest people in finance in any given college class are in Wharton.

 

Apologies in advance for your eyes but… scroll down. He doubled down on this comment more or less lol

 

Hey man -  I am going to be as nice as possible with this response. I have worked with a ton of Queen's students, and they have been some of the best people I have worked with and are usually the top quarter of Analysts. Firstly, it is unfortunate that you think that you suddenly can predict who is good or bad for a job based on your so-called acquired intelligence. Evercore did not get to where they are by being a bank that hires bad subpar talent - being hired in such a market like this should tell you enough about the caliber of talent these people possess. Your point about the laterals going to Evercore this month coming from irrelevant schools is pointless and says you do not know a lot about how Canadian banking and landscape work.

Firstly, a good amount of these laterals came from Queen's University, which is one of the most prestigious schools in Canada along with Ivey, and has consistently placed numerous students in the US for decades. This past summer alone had Queen's students at Blackstone, PJT, Evercore, Moelis, Goldman Sachs, Bridgewater, Point72, BDT&MSD, BC Partners, amongst others - once you consider that this is a non-US school placing at firms that are considered extremely prestigious even within the Harvards and Penns of the world, that should tell you the calibre of students coming out of the Queen's Commerce program.

Secondly, many of these students were part of investment clubs at Queen's, such as Limestone Capital and QUIC, which are extremely prestigious and have alumni at many major banks, PE firms and hedge funds in the US - feel free to check the websites of these clubs, and you can see the calibre of their group and alumni base.

Lastly, you make it seem as if the work done at a certain bank is so unique that it cannot be done anywhere else. What makes Canadians a strong target for many schools is due to the following: 1. Canadians who have any shot to work in the US have to work twice as hard to get that visa sponsorship, so firms know they are getting extremely hard-working talent. 2. Although majorly in the Middle Market, these banks such as TD, RBC, CIBC, Scotia and BMO dominate the entire Canadian market, and as such many of these analysts are able to get tremendous deal flow and reps, so they are able to come into the job with a solid experience and reps in their belt. Getting a job at these banks is also extremely hard as, unlike the US, there are only 5 major banks in Canada, all having a class size of 10-20, so once you compare that to the student population of the entire country, the people who actually end of here are usually at the top half of their respective schools. 

So hey - be nice and enjoy the new year. No need to downplay people's success and be a hater. Be nice and grateful for where you have gotten, and you will get further in life!

 
Controversial

You can use mental gymnastics as much as you want to make it seem as if Canadian semi-targets are on par with Wharton. They are not. Their application pool is solely from Canada, while Wharton takes the top ~500 high school students each year from across the world. In raw numbers, this makes Wharton 211x more selective. Kids at Queen's/Ivey may be the cream of the crop of their country, but kids are Wharton are the top 0.000000001% globally. This isn't even to mention the quality differential of their high school educations, as no Canadian school compares with the likes of Andover/Eton/Exeter.

 

Never said they are on par, all I said is that for a non-US school, they get jobs that even the top students at Wharton seek. Funny enough, a good portion of Queen’s Commerce students are not even Canadian with quite a few actually being American. It is also quite hilarious that you mentioned 3 very expensive private schools as if this is what the 99% of Americans get. Canadian public schools are one of top ranked globally, and although they have a ton of private schools, it’s not as much as a need as the public system does quite well.

I hope you find some time to reflect on your life and hopefully become more grateful and less egotistical. 

 
BarbourBateman

You can use mental gymnastics as much as you want to make it seem as if Canadian semi-targets are on par with Wharton. They are not. Their application pool is solely from Canada, while Wharton takes the top ~500 high school students each year from across the world. In raw numbers, this makes Wharton 211x more selective. Kids at Queen's/Ivey may be the cream of the crop of their country, but kids are Wharton are the top 0.000000001% globally. This isn't even to mention the quality differential of their high school educations, as no Canadian school compares with the likes of Andover/Eton/Exeter.

You don’t need to be the next coming of Newton to spread comps, kid. We’re not talking about quants at Jane Street here. Banking is not a high IQ job. Junior banking is a grindy, stamina-based job.

 

BarbourBateman

You can use mental gymnastics as much as you want to make it seem as if Canadian semi-targets are on par with Wharton. They are not. Their application pool is solely from Canada, while Wharton takes the top ~500 high school students each year from across the world. In raw numbers, this makes Wharton 211x more selective. Kids at Queen's/Ivey may be the cream of the crop of their country, but kids are Wharton are the top 0.000000001% globally. This isn't even to mention the quality differential of their high school educations, as no Canadian school compares with the likes of Andover/Eton/Exeter.

I can't wait to see you leaving your adolescence bubble prolonged to university (university seen as distant reality from the real world) and realize that everything you wrote means jack shit in business and career success. But if you plan to remain in academia and masturbate about how good your university is, then you're on the right track - just please stay away from any business career because I can't imagine how disappointing it will be for you to hear during your GS IB M&A TMT SA programme about how an Apollo associate from University of Alburquerque keeps your Wharton VP wake - including you dear prospect - to prepare some irrelevant shit for the next morning.

 

Lol just because the privileged Eton and Exeter kids background allowed them to be more prepared at an early age to recruit for top banks doesn't just magically make their raw IQ higher. What do you think happens when the scrappy state school kids (who are smarter than them) earn their stripes at a MM then move over to better banks? Oh yeah they are back on a level playing field now that they have learned the same things and start outpeforming.

 

Okay, calm down. What makes you imagine that every single bright person on the planet is specifically interested in leaving their home country to go specifically to USA?? There are LOTS of non-intellectual barriers (especially financial wealth-based) to entering USA too—so calm down with these bazillion decimal points, planet earth doesn't revolve around coming into the United States.

 

This is a crazy post.

From my experience, schools are pretty awful predictors of talent in this job. Wharton does produce highly trained, usually focused and ambitious analysts, but it’s not a monopoly.

As Ace Greenberg used to say, the best predictor of analyst talent is usually finding a “PSD” - poor, smart and determined. I’d sooner take a 4.0 from Baruch than someone with an equivalent grade at Harvard; I’d rather take someone who was the first in their family to get into college than a legacy from Exeter.

“Grit” is a much better predictor than “polish”.

PS - I went to Wharton.

 

I can atest, that Queen's students involved in their finance program are on-par and in majority of cases exceed in soft and technical skills in comparison to Ivy League recruits, with maybe the exception of Wharton students. These guys are consistently top bucket, dont ask me how.

 

I’ll say what everyone is thinking - you’re retarded

 

This belongs in the smoke frog section of wso. I feel you OP. Seeing the salt of the earth types invade the hallowed ground o Ivy League graduates is depressing. Stay strong despite all the negative feedback on this thread. Just remember, no matter how hard they work, pure bloods > mudbloods, long live the dark lord!

 

I went to school with the individuals you are referring to - some of the nicest and hardest working people around. Blows my mind how inconsiderate and rude people can be talking about individuals they know nothing about.

Bold statement claiming top students from a 1st world country are "low caliber" talent. Life exists outside of America. 

 

Where you go to school is almost irrelevant if you have the same amount of skills... I know plenty of bankers from Baruch and Hofstra who are most likely 100x better than you. 

 

I’m just going to assume you’re a student judging by your last few posts. The fact that Evercore is hiring laterals who attended semi-targets and “lower tier” banks is probably attitude and work ethic. They want people who have something to prove. Let me use the analogy of a sports team. You can have all the talent in the world but if they’re complacent they will lose (look at the Toronto Maple Leafs every year). Compare that to a hungry team, with a chip on their shoulder looking to prove everyone who passed them over wrong (Vegas Golden Knights). They ended up having immediate success and winning the cup recently. The Golden Knights were made up of players nobody wanted in the expansion draft. Evercore wants this mentality on their teams. They know these laterals will fight for mandates and are hungry to prove themselves. Lastly, I want to point out that banks care about your attitude and no matter how technically you are nobody wants to spend long hours with someone who looks down on their coworkers. I’d improve your attitude.

 

And look at the schools that the other person was critiquing. Besides Sidney being a HS dropout, all those schools that the other person is critiquing are in this same class of schools. They are largely solid, not elite, schools that don’t have 30%-plus of the class going to Wall St.

Although if you want to give Gorman the Columbia credit, fine. Strip him from this. Replace him with Jimmy Lee

 

Pedigree means nothing after a certain point. The only reason pedigree is high in finance is because of money. It’s easier to hire from the group that statically has better performance than spend the time and money to weed through everyone.

 

Autem voluptatem ullam provident aut fuga nesciunt. Provident ea repellendus quia eveniet adipisci est et voluptatem. Id minus at dolor officiis modi. Magni velit impedit itaque molestiae. Beatae pariatur quas qui consequuntur.

Reiciendis nesciunt quis dolores odit minima. Laborum sapiente eius rerum est. Similique distinctio omnis fuga.

Aut neque deleniti facilis est. Sint eos voluptate nam sequi. Rem autem voluptates quod quis voluptatem iure ex. Aut nobis magnam aut facere voluptas non numquam.

Quisquam rerum voluptatem repellendus quo ullam. Et natus molestias inventore excepturi corporis quos. Pariatur voluptatem accusantium qui aut. Molestiae omnis sunt eveniet vel quibusdam doloremque vero. Ipsum perspiciatis aspernatur odio nisi. Possimus vel nisi impedit nisi.

 

Unde aut sit molestias natus. Laboriosam nihil dolores consectetur et. Est corrupti corporis quia quidem nisi iusto. Quis ab error commodi dolores qui cupiditate ea. Labore ullam id illo alias culpa.

Voluptatem velit explicabo repellendus. Cum et dicta perferendis voluptatibus aliquam. Quaerat autem possimus dolor qui quam laudantium iure mollitia. Commodi dolor ut maxime.

 

Iusto eius ullam sapiente et voluptatem nostrum at consectetur. Deserunt necessitatibus aut hic officiis velit autem perferendis qui. Nemo odit repellat voluptas ut. Praesentium non nobis molestiae accusantium commodi commodi assumenda voluptatibus. Quo et quas aut ex dicta illum dolores. Quia esse recusandae cupiditate consequatur consectetur dicta libero.

Rerum qui consequatur sint eum qui tempora. Ab nihil at voluptatem numquam ratione laboriosam. Iste ea ad aliquid quasi ex. Qui aut atque beatae temporibus alias modi.

Sunt itaque fugiat quam voluptates in. Quia tempora corrupti autem debitis rem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”