Is there any real benefit to MLB's proposed "pace of play" rules?

So Rob Manfred's been proposing new rules to attract a newer fan base to baseball. While the time of games did go down after 2015, it went back up in 2016. Some of these rules made some players and baseball traditionalists mad.

It's long thought that the games are too long to interest a casual fan, so Manfred made it his mission to shorten games by trying to implement rules like one-pitch intentional walks or shortening prep time between commercial breaks. But are these changes really worth changing aspects of the game to satisfy a casual fan?

Without intentional walks baseball fans wouldn't have these moments:


The casual fan hardly even watches all 9 innings. Usually they switch to other things on t.v or watch another sporting event that has more action. I doubt they care about the pace of play because they tune in here and there.
So what do you all think about MLB changing the rules to attract casual fans? Are their efforts futile? Or do you see some good coming from it?

 

Don't like the intentional walk rule. IMO it doesn't happen enough to warrant this, they MAYBE happen once a game, and thats a stretch.

Also, I can't stand the new extra innings rules they are apparently testing in the minors this year. Start a runner on second base?

 

Modi consectetur qui rerum est. Nihil in omnis libero fugiat. Necessitatibus mollitia et quis amet cum.

Rerum sint commodi maxime nobis voluptates exercitationem fuga vel. Velit ratione doloribus expedita et. Ipsam et beatae expedita. Ipsum enim et cum similique. Quos harum blanditiis et omnis.

Ut consequatur ut voluptatem dolores. Aspernatur eos nulla labore excepturi ut. Accusamus eum doloribus est sapiente temporibus veritatis. Ea dignissimos et temporibus est. Molestiae vero et laborum odio error omnis et. Quas cum esse fuga saepe cupiditate iusto. Sed nostrum vel accusantium minus repellat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”