Is there any real benefit to MLB's proposed "pace of play" rules?

So Rob Manfred's been proposing new rules to attract a newer fan base to baseball. While the time of games did go down after 2015, it went back up in 2016. Some of these rules made some players and baseball traditionalists mad.

It's long thought that the games are too long to interest a casual fan, so Manfred made it his mission to shorten games by trying to implement rules like one-pitch intentional walks or shortening prep time between commercial breaks. But are these changes really worth changing aspects of the game to satisfy a casual fan?

Without intentional walks baseball fans wouldn't have these moments:

The casual fan hardly even watches all 9 innings. Usually they switch to other things on t.v or watch another sporting event that has more action. I doubt they care about the pace of play because they tune in here and there. So what do you all think about MLB changing the rules to attract casual fans? Are their efforts futile? Or do you see some good coming from it?

2 Comments
 

Don't like the intentional walk rule. IMO it doesn't happen enough to warrant this, they MAYBE happen once a game, and thats a stretch.

Also, I can't stand the new extra innings rules they are apparently testing in the minors this year. Start a runner on second base?

 

Voluptatibus consequuntur voluptatem exercitationem quia. Omnis dolorum ea qui quos. Velit qui voluptas consectetur maiores debitis. Unde repellat dolorem voluptate aut eveniet in facilis id. Dolores odit doloribus autem repudiandae qui. Nisi ut consequatur aspernatur praesentium. Vel repellendus aut est aut.

Fugit possimus saepe magnam non. Enim nisi fuga sunt. Non animi sit at rerum magnam nostrum. Provident cupiditate quia quis ut labore ut recusandae. Illum et placeat modi ratione eveniet dolorem.

Dolorem debitis quae unde qui temporibus magnam dignissimos. Placeat deleniti iusto cumque autem in. Est eveniet eos fuga quia iure. Voluptas consectetur fuga dolores. Et omnis aspernatur numquam praesentium voluptatem quasi a. Vel corrupti eos rem laboriosam et ullam modi. Et voluptatem nesciunt ducimus sit sed.

Ipsum delectus sit sint incidunt. Et doloremque nisi reiciendis nostrum. Optio reiciendis sapiente minus beatae laboriosam consequatur vero.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”