as the title says
Wuhan Virus now at 58% mortality rate in China (170 dead vs 124 cured). We're fucked.
updated stats here
https://3g.dxy.cn/newh5/view/pneumonia?scene=2&clicktime=1579579384&enterid=1579579384&from=groupmessage&isappinstalled=0
| +75 | BBs With The Hottest Girls | 35 | 7m | |
| +43 | Equinox Membership worth it? | 39 | 1d | |
| +38 | I want a puppy - talk me out of it | 25 | 3d | |
| +23 | PIF and Riyadh | 7 | 2d | |
| +19 | RENT MEGATHREAD: How much do you pay for rent? | 23 | 2d | |
| +19 | Am I a possible victim of identity theft (United Kingdom)??? I'm PARANOID | 8 | 6d | |
| +18 | Help: Three statement modeling for non-profits | 3 | 13m | |
| +18 | What was the most critical thinking you have done in a role? | 8 | 23h | |
| +18 | IB Analyst Creed (must repeat every morning) | 5 | 3d | |
| +14 | Advice to get into Whiskey | 16 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
That’s because to be recovered you have to fully recover which takes weeks. Someone can die in a couple of days but no one can get fully recovered in a couple days.
so, in 4 weeks, if this stat is correct, we'll have about 2000 dead. See you in a month...
Well this is sufficiently idiotic
Chinese citizens reporting that the Chinese govt is under-reporting deaths from coronavirus....and burning bodies to hide the evidence...the mortality rate is probably higher.
+SB. I think this thread needs to be taken down. Irresponsible make a claim based on a sample size of 294.
As of now (Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16pm EST) from https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html
Edited
Tami flu exists, no cure currently for Chadhan coronavirus.
Actually there is.
It has to go through procedures and testing, but it exists.
https://www.academia.edu/41743064/Systemic_Risk_of_Pandemic_via_Novel_P…
Normal distribution vs fat tailed one.
like many of Trump's tweets.....this did not age well.
Nope. Luckily I came around rather quickly, unlike many.
It doesnt seem like this has peaked.
Also first P2P case was just announced in Chicago today.
WHO declares global emergency over new coronavirus
link
That aged pretty well.
Does this mean non-targets have a better chance for IB In HK
910 dead (officially....but the real number is more like 30k dead and 200k infected if that leaked tencent data is correct)
it takes 3 weeks from symptoms to death (if you're going to die)
based on the progression of these numbers....~50% of those infected 3 weeks ago have died
The number of infected is suppressed but it is harder to cover up a death so the percentage is higher. Also, the number cured ignores people who didn't get sick enough to seek treatment and just got better on their own.
either way...the mortality rate is much higher than advertised
“VP” in “Prop trading”
lmao
there are still VPs at banks that are really prop traders...tho nobody will actually advertise that fact
understand that - was more making fun of the fact that a vp in prop trading (should be a smart guy) was making a comment such like (dumb ass comment)
Good job ironnchef. I love how CRE edited all his posts to cover up how he dismissed the issue so that he can now criticize Trump for doing exactly the same for a short time.
Hypocrisy runs in the veins of the liberal.
No, I edited it because it was a dumb take from way before this became a crisis and this website doesn’t need anymore stupidity, even if from me. Since one of the two was rated the “most helpful” post in this thread, I felt a personal responsibility to eliminate it, much like I fight against bad takes from others, because the truth is important and I am specifically not a hypocrite. I am, however, far from a perfect individual and am fully capable of saying something ignorant and then recanting later. Recognizing and admitting to mistakes is part of growing as a human.
Unlike Trump, I course corrected very quickly and very publicly throughout this forum after educating myself and, you know, I don’t have daily intelligent reports at my disposal that I could have acted on or ignored like our President.
i didn't have daily intelligence reports either.,..it was just basic fucking common sense...the Chinese lie to save face...and you know...i can do math
To be fair, my snarky comment was unnecessary. I disagree with your editing, it would have been simpler to simply add ''looking back, this was a dumb take'' and that's it. I say stupid things all the time and if you take one post from me 3 months ago, chances are I said something stupid.
Now I make fun of you, you are probably already embarassed by yourself, you prefer cover up the thing and pretend nothing happened. I was educated like that, it's terrible, you never learn anything.
Indeed we are all humans, we do mistakes, that's life. I would say the ability to grasp human limitations tends to be one of the best traits of conservatives, compared to the often blind faith in science that liberals have. Science is good, but science messes up as well, see this Covid debacle. I am sure that in time we will have a good scientific explanation, but given that we are still in the human realm, errors happen.
And Trump changed course quite quickly as well, same argument applies. Treat others as you'd like to be treated.
Dicta repellendus incidunt aspernatur qui ratione cumque ratione. Quibusdam recusandae beatae repellat earum. Enim pariatur quo nesciunt dolores. Distinctio voluptatem minima impedit sed error. At ea assumenda eius temporibus aspernatur ex et mollitia.
Aliquid magni autem officiis et. Numquam dolores aut porro tempore veniam dolorem adipisci iusto. Consequuntur a non est. Molestiae et sit voluptates numquam. Aut recusandae cum ipsa dolorum. Velit mollitia sint quia aut. Quae dolores quis magnam aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Enim pariatur et ut optio. Quasi dolorum autem ex. Molestiae explicabo reiciendis consequatur quam.
Et dolorem dolorum architecto minima est incidunt. Vitae quam et quo assumenda unde quasi saepe. Ut voluptate et minus quidem illo quia debitis. Delectus explicabo et eum qui blanditiis.
Minus distinctio a sit voluptatem. Quo consequatur voluptatem iure et fugiat.
Quia qui dolores ipsa. Rerum quos soluta quasi cupiditate deleniti non enim. Aut quia neque modi voluptas dolor soluta. Temporibus sunt dicta corporis neque perferendis laboriosam.