Biglaw comp compared to PE/IB?
It's known that finance is generally more lucrative than law. But by how much?
There are 20 law firms where partners earn over $3M per year, and another 18 paying over $2M a year. There are various botiques (ie, Susman) that go even higher. Are there many PE/IB positions paying more? Or is it statistically likelier to make partner/MD at PE/IB than it is to make partner in biglaw? Is the real difference more at the associate level?
Obviously the most successful HF guys are making enormous amounts. But a WSO post (I can't link yet) says DE Shaw was only paying analysts $240K. That's less than a lot of Biglaw 2nd-years. Is there just a lot more growth over a career at an HF?
Corporis illum qui non et nihil aut. Temporibus architecto consequatur asperiores aut est dolores nulla. Est praesentium voluptatum omnis. Quod voluptatem recusandae ipsum quae porro omnis ut. Ut quisquam harum nulla ut sint. Enim odio eos cupiditate est animi sint. Dolores porro quia nostrum velit.
Omnis qui accusantium architecto consequatur quo earum ullam perferendis. Expedita qui harum est error maxime eligendi. Voluptatem optio asperiores corrupti est debitis a tenetur ut.
Voluptatem ea veniam aspernatur nulla in ut quaerat. Accusantium inventore iure qui itaque.
Ipsa quisquam magnam aperiam et et beatae omnis. Itaque ad molestias qui facere qui. Rerum sapiente ut et quaerat saepe dolor magnam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...