Biglaw comp compared to PE/IB?
It's known that finance is generally more lucrative than law. But by how much?
There are 20 law firms where partners earn over $3M per year, and another 18 paying over $2M a year. There are various botiques (ie, Susman) that go even higher. Are there many PE/IB positions paying more? Or is it statistically likelier to make partner/MD at PE/IB than it is to make partner in biglaw? Is the real difference more at the associate level?
Obviously the most successful HF guys are making enormous amounts. But a WSO post (I can't link yet) says DE Shaw was only paying analysts $240K. That's less than a lot of Biglaw 2nd-years. Is there just a lot more growth over a career at an HF?
Labore molestiae quia suscipit earum. Magni suscipit corrupti quas porro. Voluptas ipsam commodi ullam. Quos beatae velit laudantium doloremque accusamus accusantium. Autem quaerat est recusandae. Labore odio dolor ab aut et suscipit qui.
Dolorem ut magni laudantium. Tenetur nam ut sequi voluptas aspernatur tempore voluptatibus.
Quaerat tempora sint et deserunt ut. Nobis quia dignissimos blanditiis atque quo et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...