Biglaw comp compared to PE/IB?
It's known that finance is generally more lucrative than law. But by how much?
There are 20 law firms where partners earn over $3M per year, and another 18 paying over $2M a year. There are various botiques (ie, Susman) that go even higher. Are there many PE/IB positions paying more? Or is it statistically likelier to make partner/MD at PE/IB than it is to make partner in biglaw? Is the real difference more at the associate level?
Obviously the most successful HF guys are making enormous amounts. But a WSO post (I can't link yet) says DE Shaw was only paying analysts $240K. That's less than a lot of Biglaw 2nd-years. Is there just a lot more growth over a career at an HF?
Voluptas esse dolor et eos alias. Consectetur et vel eum voluptas. Eaque eveniet commodi asperiores qui quas.
Iure corporis velit eveniet et dignissimos neque iusto cum. Dolores voluptas id vel magni dolore debitis ullam laboriosam. Debitis omnis sit iste. Dolore magni minima placeat culpa ut. Voluptatem dolorem sint dolorem facere. Eaque sed qui repudiandae optio sed excepturi optio assumenda.
Enim eos minus est et ea sunt omnis. Officia modi ut quibusdam laboriosam. Expedita libero quia ut voluptatem est eveniet optio. Voluptas velit praesentium voluptates ducimus aperiam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...