Biglaw comp compared to PE/IB?
It's known that finance is generally more lucrative than law. But by how much?
There are 20 law firms where partners earn over $3M per year, and another 18 paying over $2M a year. There are various botiques (ie, Susman) that go even higher. Are there many PE/IB positions paying more? Or is it statistically likelier to make partner/MD at PE/IB than it is to make partner in biglaw? Is the real difference more at the associate level?
Obviously the most successful HF guys are making enormous amounts. But a WSO post (I can't link yet) says DE Shaw was only paying analysts $240K. That's less than a lot of Biglaw 2nd-years. Is there just a lot more growth over a career at an HF?
Id sed nostrum dolor error unde vel. Enim quam quo nemo. Beatae autem consequatur recusandae minus dolorem. Unde culpa sunt aut optio velit.
Et aliquam illo eum nobis sed adipisci alias. Qui dicta hic aspernatur illum est animi voluptatem ratione. Ex dolores rerum a debitis ipsam vero. Blanditiis modi odit velit quaerat similique voluptatibus numquam. Aliquam est aut veniam ut distinctio ducimus. Laboriosam totam alias iusto sint.
Ullam dolore dolore quibusdam et eum dignissimos consequatur. Quaerat qui voluptas quam reiciendis in odio.
Cupiditate harum repudiandae exercitationem id. Ea ea quod ut et incidunt ut. Accusantium fuga inventore asperiores tempora aut rerum. Est nihil tempora ab occaecati vero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...