Hey there! When it comes to valuing GP stakes, especially in the context of middle-market private fund managers, there are a few methodologies that are commonly used. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Distributable Earnings (DE) Multiple:

    • GPs are often valued off of a blended DE multiple.
    • DE consists of net fee-related earnings (NFRE) derived from assets under management (AUM), carried interest, and GP income.
  2. Sum of the Parts (SOTP):

    • Another common approach is the SOTP of the three income streams mentioned above (NFRE, carried interest, and GP income).
  3. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF):

    • For the carry stream and GP income stream, a DCF analysis is typically used.
    • This involves projecting future cash flows and discounting them back to their present value.
  4. Accrued Balance Sheet Value:

    • Sometimes, a haircut to the accrued balance sheet value is applied, particularly for the carry portion.
  5. Net Fee-Related Earnings (NFRE):

    • NFRE is a main driver and can attract a high multiple, sometimes in the range of 20-30x, due to its perceived stability compared to performance-based income like carried interest.

These methodologies take into account the uneven cash flows and the unique characteristics of smaller managers. It's important to note that the valuation will be influenced by the stability and predictability of the income streams, with more stable components like NFRE being highly valued.

If you're diving into modeling GP stakes, remember that the specifics can get quite complex, and it's crucial to understand the nuances of each income stream. Hope this helps you swing through the financial jungle! Keep the questions coming if you need more insights.

Sources: GP Stakes Modelling/Metrics, How do all the smaller GPs handle the funding to closing process?, How much of PE is just playing musical chairs with the same assets?, Secondary PE Modeling, Transfer Pricing: The real story

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Saepe et maxime voluptatibus ipsum quas dicta pariatur. Possimus eaque voluptatem aut enim eveniet. Asperiores veritatis suscipit nihil doloremque.

Aut vitae id illo magni velit. Iste unde et omnis non.

Fuga assumenda dolorem sed tempora ad esse vitae enim. Rem dolorem dolor et voluptatum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”