LBO Modeling Question re: Management Rollover

Hey I am working on building some LBO models from scratch before starting in IB FT with the hopes of going on-cycle. I have a question about how the management rollover is modeled in the Sources and Uses section.

I was doing the Street of Walls LBO (LBO Modeling Test Example | Street Of Walls) and in that example, the management rollover is modeled as both a source and use. This makes sense to me as the management rolling over their equity proceeds from the transaction reduces the amount of equity the sponsor has to inject. Then, in the Uses section, the management rollover reflects that after the sale, management owns some of the pro-forma business. 

I recently tried a new LBO model 1 hour test, and there it models the rollover as only a source, not a use.


Can anyone shed light on why the management rollover is only sometimes reflected in the Uses section? If it is not, does that mean in the returns analysis, something has to change?
 


Thank you

 
Most Helpful

You should always start with the Uses section in an LBO. Start with Purchase Enterprise Value (or Equity Value + Refinancing of Net Debt), add transaction and financing fees, and min cash to B/S to get the Total Uses. You then link Total Sources to Total uses and subtract your new debt amount to find out what your total equity needs to be. That’s when you can multiply by the management rollover % to find the $ amount rolled over and the missing plug is the sponsor’s equity check. I’ve never seen management rollover in Uses and don’t think it should be. Hope that’s helpful.

 

Voluptatem fugiat vero tempora debitis saepe ex. Magnam sequi ut et voluptatem impedit. Magnam placeat nihil quae aut vero dolor. Quaerat quisquam voluptatum ut tempora ab est quo.

Quidem dolore tenetur asperiores fugit et et dolore. Quo distinctio dolor explicabo et officiis sunt ducimus voluptas. Fuga est doloremque et odio ducimus. Quo dolores dolor sed exercitationem. Cupiditate doloribus porro ex.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”