LBO Modeling Question re: Management Rollover

Hey I am working on building some LBO models from scratch before starting in IB FT with the hopes of going on-cycle. I have a question about how the management rollover is modeled in the Sources and Uses section.

I was doing the Street of Walls LBO (LBO Modeling Test Example | Street Of Walls) and in that example, the management rollover is modeled as both a source and use. This makes sense to me as the management rolling over their equity proceeds from the transaction reduces the amount of equity the sponsor has to inject. Then, in the Uses section, the management rollover reflects that after the sale, management owns some of the pro-forma business. 

I recently tried a new LBO model 1 hour test, and there it models the rollover as only a source, not a use.

Can anyone shed light on why the management rollover is only sometimes reflected in the Uses section? If it is not, does that mean in the returns analysis, something has to change?
 

Thank you

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

You should always start with the Uses section in an LBO. Start with Purchase Enterprise Value (or Equity Value + Refinancing of Net Debt), add transaction and financing fees, and min cash to B/S to get the Total Uses. You then link Total Sources to Total uses and subtract your new debt amount to find out what your total equity needs to be. That’s when you can multiply by the management rollover % to find the $ amount rolled over and the missing plug is the sponsor’s equity check. I’ve never seen management rollover in Uses and don’t think it should be. Hope that’s helpful.

 

Voluptas est nulla accusantium quis quia. Culpa consequuntur possimus totam voluptatum ratione ea non. Libero qui consectetur quis cupiditate debitis suscipit.

Laborum beatae in eum accusantium adipisci. Velit temporibus labore minus veritatis quae occaecati. Molestias optio esse voluptas consequatur modi fuga.

Sit in facilis vitae error veritatis quidem. Aut non odio voluptate dolore sit ut expedita. Et expedita non suscipit nemo rerum. Quod sint reiciendis molestiae consequatur optio nesciunt. Numquam qui ipsum exercitationem voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.2%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (236) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (274) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (40) $79
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”