Lower Mid-Mkt PE Firm - Anal to the nth degree???

Hi guys,

I got roped into working for a small 'up and coming' lower mid-mkt PE fund in NY. The 2 founders are wildly successful industry vets with 25+ yrs PE experience.

The firm also has 1 Principal, 1 VP and 2 Associates of which I am one...this is my 2nd PE firm after a 2 yr stint at another spot...so in total 6 active Investment Professionals.

So today we just had a conversation where they want to institute a 'work tracking' system where they can understand who is doing what on a weekly basis....hmmm they need that much insight into what the 2 associates are doing in a 6 ppl firm...okay?

The principal then went on to propose that each week everyone should input into Salesforce the # of hours everyone expects to work on each deal in the pipeline / various other assignments.....

We compromised that maybe we should just have a dynamic schedule up on a whiteboard that can be adjusted fluidly. We then went on to spend 1.5 hrs today mapping it all on the wall, highlighting the discrete tasks we need to accomplish with deliverable due dates on a per deal basis + estimated hours.....

Is it just me or are we treading into seriously anal territory??? (a pic of our wonderful new system is attached)

I will note that my previous PE fund had 4 Partners, 2 offices and 6 associates and yes we had a work allocation / tracking system but it was managed at the Deal/Project level:

Assoc 1 is working on X deal pre IOI, Y deal Post LOI and assisting on Portfolio Project A = understood that he is busy. The respective Partners would understand relevant work loads and manage accordingly, I never saw anyone drop the ball or miss communicate expectations in 3 yrs.

Am I crazy or is this just a sign of too much hierarchy / indication of poor management at the mid-tier level. There are another couple of warning signs at this firm (like crazy high turnover) but would love to get your input.

Cheers,
Mobs

 
Best Response

Seeing as it's your second go-around in PE, you're likely 27/28 years old. Maybe this sounds dumb, but I feel that after you've been working for 3 or 4 years, there is no reason to put up with complete and total bullshit like that. Especially not at a small firm. If they don't know who is working on what, it's because they are retarded.

 

Seconding Illinois. Was the interest the potential for rapid advancement? It seems to me that the less freedom/responsibility/trust the leaders of a firm give to their underlings, the less productive they will ultimately be. Makes me question the real business sense of such leaders, and what their reasoning is for implementing these policies in the first place.

“...all truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” - Schopenhauer
 

I've worked at a couple of PE shops of slightly larger size as well as have numerous friends in PE and this is the most absurd thing I've ever seen. Monday morning meetings in which each deal is revealed is the substitute for this sort of overly invasive form of work measurement. With 25+ years of PE experience, the partners should know by now that each deal is "unique" and requires a unique set of time invested in each of the deliverables.

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

Since your bosses want garbage-in/garbage-out over-analysis, give it to them. Calculate the amount of time these processes are going to take out of your day. Assume you can make X # of calls per hour to private companies sourcing proprietary deals and a % success rate. Assume average deal size of your firm and target returns. Calculate what that translates into in terms of carry for the partners. Now, would they rather see a salesforce report on how much time you spend on WSO or $XX in their pockets??

 

Ut eos quod molestiae cum aut optio non tempore. Explicabo ullam sint quia velit. Distinctio nobis hic praesentium placeat. Blanditiis deleniti hic mollitia cum optio et. Qui voluptatem velit tenetur numquam. Velit illo vitae consequatur eos voluptatem commodi minus. Quis et impedit reprehenderit praesentium ut et rem.

Expedita et eum eligendi est sit voluptatum. Tenetur quisquam et illum. Et vel laudantium delectus et rem.

Quae cum rerum beatae minima ex non. Quia ut sequi qui et nihil deserunt. Voluptate iusto recusandae et aliquam ipsa harum. Quis doloremque architecto non et eum. Ad molestiae magnam et officiis consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”