HYPSM Student or NESCAC Athlete for IB recruiting

I am currently a high schooler who wants to pursue a career in high-finance. Academically, I am pretty strong with good grades, test scores and extracurriculars which make me a competitive applicant for ivy leagues and other schools such as uva, michigan, georgetown,etc... 


However, I am also in the process of getting recruited for some high academic d3 schools (NESCACS, MIT, CMU). My question is, if I do end up getting offers to play at such schools like amherst/williams, would it be better from an IB recruiting standpoint to go to these less-known liberal arts schools or go to schools like Penn, UChicago or Princeton solely being an academic student if I were to also be accepted?


I am asking because I have heard about the necessity to be top of your class even at HYP in order to get top offers from banks. In addition, I would assume that the majority of students at lets say Wharton are aiming at IB, where as such is not the case for schools like MIT or NESCACS. 

 

I mean if you get into MIT and can be a student athlete, you should definitely do that. MIT student athlete is way more impressive and will set you apart in recruiting much more than being a regular student at, for example, Michigan (which is also a fantastic school but has many people vying for IB). Although, it’s very unlikely that you’ll get into MIT, so I wouldn’t worry about that unless you actually do.

 

I would go to the Ivy. I was a recruited athlete for a slew of NESCACS as well. My impression from talking to a LOT of student athletes during recruiting trips was that NESCACS are generally amazing places that provide a great college experience (especially if you went to a smaller high school), but they don’t really set you apart when recruiting for high finance roles like Princeton or Penn would, even if you’re an athlete. NESCACS simply have too few students historically pursuing these types of roles for there to be established pipelines into big/prestigious firms. Of course there are still plenty of people who went to Williams or Amherst who end up in impressive high finance roles, but they’re generally scattered and so your ability to rely on your school’s network to break into firms is limited. There isn’t, for example, a group of 5 partners at KKR who all went to Tufts, but there is a group who went to Penn.

Being an athlete doesn’t really convince anyone you’re right for a role. It’s more so a positive boost to your application that could help in some situations, but it could also be seen about as positively as being involved in some random finance club on campus (particularly if your interviewer wasn’t an athlete). Of course, if you really want to play your sport in college and the best way to do that is going to a NESCAC, you should do that. You will be happier and you will likely eventually be able to find your way to a firm you like enough, if you don’t get it early on or out of undergrad.

In short, you should go to an Ivy (especially HYPP) if your primary goal in college is maximizing your chances of breaking into GS or Bain Cap out of undergrad. Otherwise, I would play sports at a great d3 school (that’s what I did).

 

Truthfully, the NESCAC athlete may have an easier time getting that first IB job, even over an ivy student. However, you are passing up 40 years of superior network over your career if you choose NESCAC over HYPSM. Just keep that in mind when making your decision. That said, it is totally valid to choose a NESCAC if you want to be an athlete in college. Everyone has different goals and preferences. However, I would not choose a NESCAC solely for recruiting purposes.

 
Most Helpful

hit up the coach at the ivies you’re interested in and ask about the possibility of coming as a walk on. Research the team and say why you want that team / school in particular thru the lens of athletics. Focus on building a very good answer before the call. Kiss some ass and if you’re a walk on for football basketball hockey lax etc, they always need a kid with a 4.0 and 35 ACT so they can take the retard star player with a 25 ACT. If youre lucky they may even help you get into the school.

 

I think you should look at the target school rankings (very easy to find on this forum and there is general consensus of the top schools even if some debate over ranking) and compare to your options for athletic recruiting. If you can come in as an athlete at any great school you have a much better shot than applying through normal avenues. In terms of expected value it’s clear. Value of Penn x 0.07 versus Value of MIT x 0.90+ if you can get recruited there. A really fucking nice bird in the hand versus a snipe hunt.

 

Was in a similar situation, have friends who went down both paths, and am now finishing my second year at a top bank/group. 

Obviously the ideal position for recruiting is being a top kid at Harvard or Wharton. Assuming this isn't you (it isn't most people), here is my opinion:

It is easier to break in as a top finance candidate at a NESCAC (~top 5-10 in your class depending on which one) than as an average / below average kid at most of the ivies just given the lack of competition (as you alluded to). It'll also just feel less competitive as you go through the process and school will probably be more chill. 

Excluding maybe 2-3 of the NESCACs, most have a strong presence across top firms and the networks are generally pretty tight. Some alum will also be willing to help kids from other NESCACs. However, the number of alum at each bank will usually be small, and so it's pretty crucial be a top kid (especially if you aren't diverse) since those people are only going to push for a few kids each year. Williams may be the exception as there are more alum in the industry, more kids trying to do banking, and there is a more developed recruiting infrastructure than the rest of the schools, so it's just a different dynamic. 

Another thing to consider is that generally, there will be less structure at the NESCACs and so success is pretty dependent on being self-motivated (you should be fine if you're asking about this stuff as a high school kid). Having the surrounding club scene / increased finance interest at most Ivies would likely make that a better path if you need the structure. 

The above poster may be right that most people don't give a shit about athletics, but it definitely is a factor coming out of the NESCAC since you'll notice when networking that many of the alum in the industry were athletes. Also, a large part of the value in being an athlete is the benefit of having upperclassmen / analysts from your team to guide you.

That said, there is a big difference between lacrosse/hockey and track/swimming (would put most other sports in between). Preppier sports at NESCACs are filled with top prep school and wealthy West Chester / Fairfield county / NJ kids who, on average, are more likely to have recruiting advantages aside from just going to a good school and playing a sport (generational wealth, friends and family in the industry, etc.). As you'd expect, these sports will have more alum in banking which is a huge benefit in recruiting. 

MIT/CMU is just a totally different experience. But a few positives with MIT is that it's EA (you could theoretically get the coach to help you and also toss in an ED at an Ivy) and there are a few MIT kids who will get into Global Platinum Securities (which basically puts MF PE and HFs on table for recruiting), but I wouldn't bank on that. 

Honestly though, if you're already on top of this stuff in high school, you'll probably be fine either way. 

 

Responding because I am currently a sophomore at CMU playing a LMM sport (think Golf, Men's Volleyball, Bass Fishing). Some would argue this school is a semi-target but they're just coping. Decided I wanted to do IB during my freshman fall and have since slowly realized how little support the school offers for people pursuing careers in finance. I encourage you to ask any CMU alumni currently in banking and they will only have bad things to say about the CMU business program as a path into finance. Great school if you aren't exactly set on IB (top CS, Engineering, Arts) but it sounds like you've figured that out. Pretty sad considering the school is named after one of the most badass hedge fund managers of all time- D Tep!!!!!

You are smart for considering this in your high school years. Life sounds easier going to a target or at least a school that puts some value on IB. Obviously I can only see one side but from the list you've given, you have better options from solely an IB perspective.

Buy Side however, CMU is on the rise. Since Jane Street, HRT, and Optiver do on campus recruiting for quant, top PE and HF (Ares, Audax, Citadel, P72) are recognizing the quantitative focus of the business program and starting to give internships here. But you have to know your stuff and be a finance gremlin out the womb for those. 


Final Rec: Ivies are respected for a reason. If you get in it would feel very weird to deny for CMU or Amherst given your career goals... like very weird. From an expected value perspective, your career placements will be on average higher going to an Ivy vs NESCACS so any rational investor would choose Ivy. 

I would recommend finding each schools student run investment fund website and seeing where current students have interned. The top kids at each school are likely in the club so it could make things a lot clearer given some real examples of placements. Feels really bad to sway you away from this school but it's what I wished I would have known. Also seek other opinions don't rule any school out based on one comment. 

 

Ipsa sit consequuntur voluptatem dolorum modi. Harum rem sequi ut. Voluptas optio animi voluptatem aperiam in velit. Nobis iste perferendis minima dolore adipisci.

Eos repudiandae sint est nihil quis eligendi. Voluptatem quibusdam non quis doloremque quaerat nemo et. Aut facere culpa nihil.

Non incidunt voluptatem et dolorem soluta distinctio. Iusto consequuntur temporibus molestiae molestiae impedit.

Nisi et ut nemo. Eum totam eos facere et et ipsum voluptatum. Qui omnis ut aut molestias in itaque. Atque pariatur non eum fuga molestiae sed iusto est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”