Goldman's 100mm wrong bet on Natural Gas
I'm sure there is a better article, but still good nonetheless. Essentially states that GS was long DOM/Eastern nat gas basis that went from -.30 to -1.30 cents. This caused a 100mm trading loss. This is a great example of the volatile nature of the energy markets and how one way bets like this can really blow up in someone's face. The amount of size you have to have to lose that type of coin is significant.
I hear this is also what caused Vitol to lose a lot of $$ on a similar position, although i heard theirs was back-end of the curve dom south. I'm sure this caused a few people to get let go. I'm not sure if this was all one trader, although most likely was one traders book as I can't see how many east gas traders GS has. I've heard of guys getting let go for much much less of a loss than this.
heard Citadel lost a similar amount trading NE basis. Everyone involved got turfed. I think alot of shops were on the wrong side of this NE trade. However most shops cant but on the size that Citadel/GS can put on....
I havent heard of any of the Traders at GS getting turfed however
I haven't heard of who was on the right side of the trade..
Almost the same thing that happened with fixed-price natty at the beginning of the year. Day 1 Nymex down .40 and stop outs galore until it hit 2.75. The market was so long and I heard rumors of everyone losing money but never got wind of who was on the right side of that trader either.
honestly I know it sounds dumb, but all I can think of is producer hedging?
I've heard of guys getting bounced for being down a buck, so thats crazy that guy is still in his seat
Citadel got burnt this time last year on CBOT Soybeans to the tune of 100mm too. Ouch.
Citadel reportedly lost $200MM in Q1 '17. The natgas hedge fund Velite apparently vaporized 45% of its portfolio value on bad gas bets
I don't have access to the article, but is it suggesting that the 100 mm loss was all east basis related, or east basis length was just a part of that number?
Agree with comments that a lot of fundamentally "right" trades went wrong in 2q between the east and NYMEX. "Back end" is an interesting distinction on dom- is that winter 17/18? Cal 20+? Bal summer had fundamental issues of its own - production growth and TCO maintenance being the big two there IMO, but if the length was in the winter then this Rover choppiness may be noise. I don't know how reliable it is, but the CFTC data suggests the market is still quite long ICE dominion. Cal 20 and beyond have been relatively well bid despite everything going on further up front - I have my theories...
This is a small poker table - did the big stacks leave for the time being, or just temporarily short stacked?
In and out, and stack ahead of time for a short-term period.
Problem is how many open positions they carry. I back most of my positions in. I rarely keep stuff open, it's not against my risk policy, but I feel it's more conservative. I won't carry a position of 6 figure dekatherms open. I just won't. I'll leave basis open as physical position changes, but nothing huge.
Citadel, for example, buys without any backing in. They'll pick up capacity on some pipes for the weekend, hoping to sell to some sucker. Works 3 or 4 times, loses 6 or 7 times. If the 3 times they are winning beats the losses of the 6 or 7 times-- sure, great. But I know in some areas it's just not. Too damn competitive. And if I get some sense they are going to be in competition with me, I'd beat their offer.
Look at all the REX/NWP/ and i wanna say Kern they have been picking up. Just bidding on discounted pipe
On the other side of this trade, the power producer Dynegy hedged itself like a mofo when M-3 was trading $0.80, and are absolutely crushing all the nuclear/old coal up in those regions.
its funny all the gas guys got burned and the power guys made out like bandits. Some of the few I know that called BS on nymex earlier this year
Do you guys think it was Robert Du Val at GS Nat Gas?
CCI got fucked up at AECO too. I haven't heard Citadel or GS dropping their folks, though. Citadel out West just did something uber aggressive too. We'll see if it works out.
Citadel acquiring more pipe space out west?
They're becoming more aggressive on short term transport, from what I've seen. but somebodies sucking it out of them cause they don't renew it after it expires.
A true shit show over there.
Not sure if they are getting any long-term capacity, just know they are aggressive bidders on RFP fronts.
Not indicative, but I do know of someone at a physical shop who lost a $1B one year and kept his seat.
There was a bunch of producer hedging they were trying to cover, and they were pretty loudly talking this view up to the market. Dom basis hadn't been that strong in over 2 years, the market was on track for a supply deficit, and all the new demand that everyone had been praying for was starting to show signs of arriving. BUT more so this was a Rover bet. ETC had a pretty long history of delivering pipe on time, but the logistics of such a big pipe as well as the regulatory issues (turnover at FERC, etc.) really shot this trade in the face. If rover would have come in they still would have had a loss but I doubt it would have been as large.
I think their other main issue was betting that producers had actually learned their lesson and they wouldn't all jump back into producing into a glut of supply. One day the traders in the market are going to learn that producer's produce, they don't trade, and they are making widgets. The majority of their thinking is more widgets means more money especially in the NE where the economics are strong for the core producers.
GS Co Head of Commodities announced he is retiring today. Not sure if it had anything to do with the Loss.
Yes it was obviously him. He is a dumb slut!
Nam laudantium eaque sunt occaecati non quam et. Sed nemo exercitationem quisquam est. Sed dicta consectetur et accusantium est laudantium. Doloremque et dolorem quaerat autem nam eius. Accusantium eum ad sapiente quod aut harum.
Est culpa maxime doloribus autem libero possimus. Voluptatum eligendi accusantium repellat ipsam quam. Ratione eveniet odit et ut illo repudiandae nisi. Neque ut facere corrupti accusantium commodi molestiae esse. Perferendis aut quaerat voluptates ullam quo aut. Magni sed perferendis alias omnis vitae. Ullam doloremque officia commodi animi maiores et enim qui.
Incidunt rerum repellat sunt est est. Repudiandae numquam ullam et eveniet sit est perspiciatis at. Similique et soluta quia et. Consequatur beatae voluptatem saepe dolore.
Debitis maiores facere consequatur sint dolores optio. Eum quas quo non ab. In ut sed amet culpa rem doloribus. Non quidem alias autem dignissimos ratione quia veniam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Ducimus qui quia hic occaecati mollitia. Eius praesentium tempora delectus. Quis et et fugiat voluptatem eum veritatis unde explicabo. Aut nisi aut blanditiis quod quibusdam explicabo nam. Soluta possimus incidunt qui.
Totam accusamus officia qui at. Quos rerum odit aut porro. Vitae ullam modi dolore perferendis unde ut. Aut tempore ea corrupti nesciunt non quae. Nostrum harum ipsam sit corrupti odit laudantium ex.
Est quasi cumque natus odio. Eum tenetur aliquid autem vel quia commodi. Quae numquam nihil quis blanditiis cum impedit. Repudiandae iusto est aut enim quia totam inventore. Est est inventore distinctio quia quam totam aspernatur doloribus.