Calc II Necessary for econ/finance?

Is Calc II nessary for econometrics/game theory? Do Grad programs in economics/finance require Calc II? I know that Calc III - Multi is useful for economics, but do you need to know Calc II in order to take/understand Calc III/Multivariable? Sorry if this sounds dumb, Business calc classes do strange things in plucking certain things from calc i, calc ii and calc iii and often times leave you ill prepared for economics courses which is why I'm taking regular calc - but Calc II will likely be impossible for me to do well in as I am not great at math.

13 Comments
 

You'd be fine with even pre-calc if you're good at visualizing numbers, have a good sense of how mathematics works, and can do calculations in your head. I did up to calc-2 and it's way, way overkill for everything I've seen in business thus-far.

In terms of economics, if you're going to do grad school I say that calc-3 is the threshold you want to reach to qualify for more difficult programs and to be a fairly competent economist.

in it 2 win it
 

Calc II was the most worthless math class I took in undergrad. Calc I is essential, Calc III is extremely important (multivariate opimization, indifference curves and all that jazz). Linear algebra is vital for econometrics. I have yet to encounter an important econ or finance topic that uses a lot of Calc II (I am assuming Calc I covered integration extensively as that is obv important for probability).

Estimating bond price changes using duration and convexity technically uses a Taylor approximation, but you don't really need to know that.

All that said I would recommend taking it if it's a prerequisite to Calc III. It's not that hard.

 
Best Response

Different schools split Calc 1/2/3 up differently, so be careful. At my school Calc 2 is multivarable, but I think it's generally accepted that Calc 1 = single-var differentiation, Calc 2 = single-var integration, Calc 3 = multivariable.

This also depends on your econ program, of course. For Econometrics, etc. it's really nice to know multivariable (and linear algebra). For some advanced economics you need diffEQ as well. For grad-level economics you absolutely CAN'T get by on just single-variable calculus unless you want to kill yourself with self-studying to catch up. I think most (good) econ PhD programs require multivariable calculus + linear algebra + probability/statistics at LEAST.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 
chicandtoughnessDifferent schools split Calc 1/2/3 up differently, so be careful. At my school Calc 2 is multivarable, but I think it's generally accepted that Calc 1 = single-var differentiation, Calc 2 = single-var integration, Calc 3 = multivariable.

This also depends on your econ program, of course. For Econometrics, etc. it's really nice to know multivariable (and linear algebra). For some advanced economics you need diffEQ as well. For grad-level economics you absolutely CAN'T get by on just single-variable calculus unless you want to kill yourself with self-studying to catch up. I think most (good) econ PhD programs require multivariable calculus + linear algebra + probability/statistics at LEAST.

Is it possible to learn Calc III/Linear Algebra without Calc II? All of the upper level math classes are easy (to get a B in) at my university because the profs make the exams so hard that anyone who doesn't fail pretty much gets a B- at least. I've always been an A-/B+ math student and Calc II has like a 50% fail rate which is actually fairly common I've heard at state U's throughout the country.

 
blastoiseare you fkin kidding me for phd lvl econ you need to know about stohcatic diffrential equations

I may go for an MS in economics possibly to transition into public policy if I don't go into finance out of undergrad. I was asking whether I would be able to succeed in MS level econometrics with just calc 1, and if I needed multi whether I would be able to skip Calc II and take Calc III right away.

 
Husky32I was asking whether I would be able to succeed in MS level econometrics with just calc 1, and if I needed multi whether I would be able to skip Calc II and take Calc III right away.
There's a reason why 3 comes after 2 and not 1. If you want to skip Calc 2 then you're going to still need to put in the time to learn Calc 2 material. Maybe not super in-depthly but you need the foundation. MS-level econometrics with Calc 1? Kiss those good grades goodbye. Have you ever seen an econometrics textbook? Get a copy of Hayashi's Econometrics and skim the first couple of chapters- you'll know immediately what you need to learn. (Alternatively, read the "prerequisites" section in the Amazon preview: http://www.amazon.com/Econometrics-ebook/dp/B007AIXESK/ref=tmm_kin_titl…)
Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

I wouldn't recommend Multi without Calc II (assuming Calc II at your school pretty much covers single-variable integration). Multivariable calculus involves a ton of integration, so you need to be comfortable with that stuff.

As for whether it is necessary, it depends. If you want to really get into econometrics, it is useful for probability and statistics. But for most econ courses only Calc I and Calc III are useful.

As others have said already, for PhD level econ you need all the calculus you can take and linear algebra. And then throw in some pure math courses to be competitive (real analysis, measure theory, etc)

 

For Econometrics and Game Theory at the undergrad level, you'll likely only need Calc I. Calc III would be helpful for partial derivatives, but Calc I should suffice. If you learned integral calculus, you can probably skip II and take III. That's what I did, and I only missed taylor series, which I've never needed.

 

Saepe ex dolor ut. Est animi consequatur laudantium eligendi blanditiis aspernatur reiciendis quia. Velit fugiat impedit facilis ut dolores deleniti odit sequi. Aut praesentium illo ut consequatur sit nam.

Debitis qui deleniti corporis nulla et incidunt. Molestiae doloribus asperiores voluptatum aut doloribus. Doloribus quia magni ipsum nesciunt rem voluptatem.

Labore itaque vel sit alias et omnis. Ea nisi nihil repellat blanditiis quis et dignissimos dolore. Excepturi voluptas sit non explicabo doloremque. Natus in sint culpa ut. Quasi numquam nam voluptas ipsam aliquid voluptate. Reprehenderit assumenda aut similique rerum suscipit quasi.

Qui assumenda quia voluptatem ipsam rerum. Impedit aliquid accusantium ea maiores consequatur. Autem non maxime perferendis omnis tempora aliquid sint.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”