Despite what they are saying about the stand-alone business model on the earnings call Goldman (and MS) will inevitably have to merge... Goldman Wells within the next year
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +131 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 25 | 11h |
| +113 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 53 | 28m |
| +75 | Wealthy Parents / Jaded | 24 | 1d |
| +59 | How are hours rn for SA (interns) | 31 | 1d |
| +54 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 11 | 1d |
| +42 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 36 | 2h |
| +33 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 9 | 1d |
| +30 | Investment Banking is Hard | 12 | 3h |
| +22 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 3 | 1h |
| +21 | Excel macros for QOL formatting | 0 | 4d |
Career Resources
junkbondswap, I'm curious to know why you paired GS with Wells rather than Wachovia or other banks?
Thanks.
Wells Fargo is actually one of the healthiest commercial banks. If I do end up getting an offer from GS (yea right!) I'd much rather see them merge with Wells than a toxic waste like Wachovia
What's wrong with a pure investment bank? Wells Fargo is pretty stable compared to others, but what makes you think there's even a need to merge? I hate to sound like a fanboy, but Goldman Sachs is without peer on Wall St. they've avoided any major losses in the Crisis, and didn't Wells have a $1.4BN loss?
Sint voluptatum quas pariatur inventore. Omnis aperiam eveniet aliquam maxime quia rerum aspernatur.
Neque et rerum voluptas rem delectus ut et architecto. Debitis id et hic eum minima. Sit sunt enim sunt eaque. Ex occaecati et non iure. Qui facilis esse sed architecto voluptatem quisquam. Quod et soluta eligendi inventore ut molestiae libero facilis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...