Impact investing - choices

Hello everyone,

The subject of impact investing hasn't been very prominent on this site so far, but maybe there is someone here who could help. I'm currently in M&A at a strong MM shop in a major city and but decided to abandon banking for international development / impact investing. I've secured direct investment (PE/VC style) offers from two different places - one is a development bank (think IFC / EIB / EBRD / ADB) and the other is an investment arm of a prominent philanthropic foundation. Comp is comparable and both teams seem very credible. What in your view is a better option? While I'm keen to dabble in development finance, I want to avoid burning bridges to more mainstream buyside roles down the line.

 
Best Response

Honestly it depends on what your goals and interests are, particularly when it comes to impact investing where people have different personal passions and you are presumably entering the field because you want to make a difference to something that matters to you.

Decide for yourself how you want to invest: - Geography: Domestic developed markets (US) vs. international developed markets (e.g. Europe) vs. emerging / developing markets (e.g. Africa, SE Asia, South America) - Sector: Tech vs. health and wellness vs. renewable energy vs. financial inclusion vs. education vs. sustainable consumer products (or some combination) - Stage: VC / startups vs. early stage PE / growth businesses vs. later stage PE / more mature businesses - Asset Class: equity vs. preferred equity / mezzanine debt vs. project finance vs. real assets etc. - Returns: Market-rate returns / mission-related investing (MRIs) vs. below market rate / program related investing (PRIs) / venture philanthropy

If you want the ability to go to a traditional buyside role later on, then I would probably recommend joining a firm that targets market-rate returns (rather than below market rate / PRIs) because the financial analysis would be similar. The other factor would be choosing a sector where many traditional VC/PE firms operate (like tech, healthcare, or consumer - typically in developed countries) so that you'd gain some industry knowledge and have more options - although you may be able to argue that becoming an expert in a niche area can be valuable as well.

To my knowledge, most large foundations (e.g. Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Packard Foundation, Skoll Foundation) engage in below market rate investing. Not entirely sure about development banks - think some do below market rate as well but might depend on which one it is. Obviously there's a lot of factors at play here and I'd need more information to give you a better / more specific recommendation, but hope this helps.

Source: I left a top BB after 2 years as an IBD analyst to become a PE associate at an impact investing firm

 

Hi everyone, I'm also very interested in Impact PE after 2 years in banking. Are the megafund impact funds recruiting on-cycle? Is it a two year and out program? Do they do actual controlling LBO investments or are most of these growth / VC focused funds? At the banks you guys work at, is there a lot of buzz around impact investing or do you think its not as competitive as normal megafund / upper-MM PE?

 

Most are growth focused (look at Bain and KKR). It is definitely not as competitive, but look through Bain's team page. They certainly aren't taking any slouches. They recruited on cycle, but I am not sure about the other funds. I only know about this having gone through Bain's interview process, which was tough (consulting focused and I am not so hot at case study framework interviews...)

 

Veritatis animi nemo voluptate ut. Voluptas eos ut quidem ut non eius dicta quo. Enim aliquid tempora laborum ex ab non exercitationem est. Voluptatem accusantium possimus qui rerum esse facere perspiciatis. Commodi ab perspiciatis numquam sint qui.

Cum voluptatibus ratione minus et. Omnis iure sit quis saepe. Velit quibusdam et et aspernatur sit tempora laboriosam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”