come back once you have the offers.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
andres.arboleda:
Oreos:
come back once you have the offers.
kind of rough your reply... but anyway. I've got accepted in both of them.
LBS it is then
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

I'm not in a position to compare the programs on the criteria you mention, but I would say the Oxbridge experience is really unique. As an alum I am biased, but I wouldn't ignore the perspective changing power that a year in one of those historic institutions has.

 
ValueVeronese:
I'm not in a position to compare the programs on the criteria you mention, but I would say the Oxbridge experience is really unique. As an alum I am biased, but I wouldn't ignore the perspective changing power that a year in one of those historic institutions has.

Thanks for your reply. Yes. I agree with you in the uniqueness of such experience. That's why, to be honest, I am more biased towards the Cambridge program. LBS is great and places pretty good. No doubt about that. But is Cambridge really that inferior as people in the forums think? They dont regard this program as good as LBS but never give a good reason for it.

 
ValueVeronese:
It's a personal decision. For me, I enjoyed becoming part of one of the oldest educational institutions in the world with such a proud history and rich tradition.

@ValueVenorese, what program did you attend and which school (oxford or Camb)?. If it was the MFin at Cambridge, do you mind sharing some of your experience?

Thanks

 

I think people on this forum tend to say LBS because of the prestige of LBS MBA (which is way better than the Cambridge MBA, especially to land a job in IBD). If you are going to attend one of these programs without any relevant working experience, I would go with Cambridge. I've seen a lot of people, coming from an MSc program at Cambridge, landing a job in the City. If you are talking about attending a post-experience program, I would prefer LBS because it can leverage the network they have because of the MBA.

I'm grateful that I have two middle fingers, I only wish I had more.
 
cruel3a:
I think people on this forum tend to say LBS because of the prestige of LBS MBA (which is way better than the Cambridge MBA, especially to land a job in IBD). If you are going to attend one of these programs without any relevant working experience, I would go with Cambridge. I've seen a lot of people, coming from an MSc program at Cambridge, landing a job in the City. If you are talking about attending a post-experience program, I would prefer LBS because it can leverage the network they have because of the MBA.
LBS is post experience, Cam is sorta post experience (ie, you got it? great! you don't? you still may get in)
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
Oreos:
LBS is post experience, Cam is sorta post experience (ie, you got it? great! you don't? you still may get in)

Then if he has 2 or more yrs of experience and he's targeting associate/similar level positions, I'd go with LBS.

I'm grateful that I have two middle fingers, I only wish I had more.
 

LBS is a better school for postgraduate programs. That's a solid fact. I think, ceteris paribus, you should go there. Obv., if money is an issue, you also have to consider it. If you are trying to find a first-year analyst position in UK, Cambridge will work perfectly since it is a VERY-target school. Don't know that much about VISA for south-american students but I am pretty sure there will be some colombian in London with an MBA from LBS (don't know if you can't tell the same about Cambridge MSF).

I'm grateful that I have two middle fingers, I only wish I had more.
 
cruel3a:
LBS is a better school for postgraduate programs. That's a solid fact. I think, ceteris paribus, you should go there. Obv., if money is an issue, you also have to consider it. If you are trying to find a first-year analyst position in UK, Cambridge will work perfectly since it is a VERY-target school. Don't know that much about VISA for south-american students but I am pretty sure there will be some colombian in London with an MBA from LBS (don't know if you can't tell the same about Cambridge MSF).

Thanks Cruel3a. Just to be clear, you're talking about the master of finance at cambridge right? Not the Mphil. It is kinda surprising to know you can only get analyst positions coming out from a program that requieres at leats 2 yr WE. Thanks for the update, though. It certainly weights in the decision

 
andres.arboleda:
Thanks Cruel3a. Just to be clear, you're talking about the master of finance at cambridge right? Not the Mphil. It is kinda surprising to know you can only get analyst positions coming out from a program that requieres at leats 2 yr WE. Thanks for the update, though. It certainly weights in the decision

What I meant was just that Cambridge is very strong to place undergrad into banking. I am pretty sure that people attending the MSF will be able lo land more senior jobs but I think that if you are looking for an experienced hire, you should prefer LBS.

I'm grateful that I have two middle fingers, I only wish I had more.
 
Best Response

Hi andres. I have accepted the Cambridge Mfin offer. How about you.. I did not apply to LBS as I only wanted to do the program at Cambridge. I have my own reasons for choosing Cambridge over LBS :

  1. I have about 2 years of work ex at PwC in M&A and PE strategy with a a couple of deal announcements and strong undergrad GPA . Cambridge fits well as it requires 2 years of work ex as against LBS which I guess requires a minimum of three.

2.I am analyst at PwC. I need a post grad degree with a strong brand name to rise further, either in my current role or shift to a pure strategy consulting firm\Investment bank (M&A) at a associate\consultant level or a PE at an analyst level

  1. A major consideration is that I am only 22 and I may consider an MBA later on say when I am 27-28, preferably US IVY league business schools, so MFIN at Cambridge is not my final destination in terms of my academic pursuits. So i am taking the Cambridge experience first and leaving the standalone business school experience for a later date ( only if there is a need to do an MBA later on)

My interactions with friends and colleagues in the UK suggest that both LBS and Cambridge have strong brand recall. The mfin is LBS is relatively older than the one at Cambridge and studying in London has its own advantage.

With respect to jobs, my view is that a lot depends on prior work ex (what profile, which team, which firm, length of work ex, any significant achievements, undergrad GPA, extracurriculars). Both the programs are one year full time programs and job applications (IB and strategy consulting) open very early. So if you are considering taking a job in the uk (no idea about the visa regulations), at the interview stage, you may not have any credential\ GPA from these school other than the fact that you are a student there.

Not sure how helpful this reply would be to you, since it almost two months since you initiated this thread and by now you would have accepted either of the offer.

It would be great to capture your perspective on the same

Best Regards

Prateek Trehun

 

Rem rerum similique quis labore. Magnam ut error eveniet dolor qui. Et nam maxime quae rerum.

Quia assumenda et qui eveniet iure occaecati sint. Temporibus veritatis animi nemo voluptates. Tenetur sunt sunt sit et sint.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”