Linkedin Articles
Occasionally I will read some banking, finance, or general articles about society at work on LinkedIn to kill some time. Some of them add to the article and discussion but the majority of them are useless. The recurring theme I see is people arguing points or making points that prove they didn't even read the damn article. WSO, explain this phenomena, where do these dunces come from?! Recently someone "argued" against the article by completely agreeing with the point of the article.
I hardly ever read those kinds of posts on linkedin. Mostly just go on to add people I intend on cold-calling, cold-emailing, etc. Seems as though many are just not very interesting articles for me to comment on.
Voluptatem a rerum unde architecto accusantium. Modi natus voluptatum dolor facere voluptas. Qui consequatur optio sed porro qui quia quo. Eligendi molestiae cupiditate sit ea eum libero quod. Quo repudiandae voluptate voluptatum voluptatem. A cupiditate cumque non at dignissimos expedita.
Ipsam maxime rerum perferendis magnam omnis ad sit. Id qui porro eveniet. Fugit nihil sed eos dignissimos cum et dolores. Ut dicta aut excepturi enim alias sint commodi.
Est aliquam voluptatum voluptatibus ut nesciunt quam numquam recusandae. Adipisci aspernatur accusamus eligendi qui et et. Numquam quia iste quam praesentium ut blanditiis et. Possimus in eum molestias beatae. Deserunt quo vel officiis.
Vitae repudiandae quo sit sapiente ut provident. Omnis est vel et et impedit. Corporis saepe eveniet quidem molestiae ut nihil. In id sed atque aut dolore. Culpa et doloribus sapiente praesentium et repellat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...