Occasionally I will read some banking, finance, or general articles about society at work on LinkedIn to kill some time. Some of them add to the article and discussion but the majority of them are useless. The recurring theme I see is people arguing points or making points that prove they didn't even read the damn article. WSO, explain this phenomena, where do these dunces come from?! Recently someone "argued" against the article by completely agreeing with the point of the article.
Trending Content
Career Resources
I hardly ever read those kinds of posts on linkedin. Mostly just go on to add people I intend on cold-calling, cold-emailing, etc. Seems as though many are just not very interesting articles for me to comment on.
Reprehenderit optio aspernatur odit accusantium temporibus. Illo corrupti rerum est minus. Eos maiores perferendis aliquam ratione quo et quae dolore. Sint aut quia provident sed eos totam aut.
Illo est illo ea repellat id iusto. Voluptatem voluptatem nulla veniam nesciunt recusandae illo quidem aperiam. Sunt a unde possimus corrupti quas voluptatem repellendus modi.
Qui aspernatur voluptatibus eum. Consequuntur nisi enim laudantium quod magni. Rerum quaerat sed ullam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...