Stock Analysts on CNBC
O
Tags:
(Baboon, 126
Points)
on 3/22/11 at 4:31pm
I'm talking about when a company announces earnings and the analysts come on to talk about whether or not they beat expectations. Would this be considered part of equity research?





I think so, but i'm not sure.
I think so, but i'm not sure.
Yes. Usually they are
Yes. Usually they are reputable analysts that cover the company and that sector
Shmoozer wrote: Yes. Usually
Yes. Usually they are reputable analysts that cover the company and that sector
Wrong. You're just as big of an idiot on here as you are on Analyst Forum.
http://www.analystforum.com/phorums/read.php?1,123...
Ray Finkle wrote: Shmoozer
Yes. Usually they are reputable analysts that cover the company and that sector
Wrong. You're just as big of an idiot on here as you are on Analyst Forum.
http://www.analystforum.com/phorums/read.php?1,1235744
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_i0VMo_pn52Q/S4GP36x1PkI/...
ZING
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
I thought the OP was
I thought the OP was referring to the guests, not the actual CNBC correspondents, moron
Shmoozer wrote: I thought the
I thought the OP was referring to the guests, not the actual CNBC correspondents, moron
Shut up, stupid.
Just b/c an analyst is on TV doesn't mean they are good. Hate to break it to you but most of the analysts you see on TV are not II AA or what have you. I don't think it means you're bad but definitely not good b/c you are on TV. Those channels will take almost anyone.
I'm not talking about the
I'm not talking about the people who actually work for CNBC, I'm talking about the guests they bring on.
Get off your high horse you
Get off your high horse you pompous dbag. Most analysts on CNBC are reputable, and are often noted as so by their awards by the CNBC employees. You know we can also just look them up to verify too? Many PMs and other buyside guys too, so obviously they aren't "ranked." Why would CNBC be wasting their time with no-names who have zero credit? Jesus.
Ray Finkle wrote: Shmoozer
I thought the OP was referring to the guests, not the actual CNBC correspondents, moron
Shut up, stupid.
Just b/c an analyst is on TV doesn't mean they are good. Hate to break it to you but most of the analysts you see on TV are not II AA or what have you. I don't think it means you're bad but definitely not good b/c you are on TV. Those channels will take almost anyone.
I'm siding with Ray on this one, at least with respect to sell-side analysts. Majority of them are not II ranked. Whether or not they're good is a whole other question that's debateable.
I like the analysts on the
I like the analysts on the Colbert Report. I trust them. They're almost as good as the analysts on FOX news.
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
Shmoozer wrote: Get off your
Get off your high horse you pompous dbag. Most analysts on CNBC are reputable, and are often noted as so by their awards by the CNBC employees. You know we can also just look them up to verify too? Many PMs and other buyside guys too, so obviously they aren't "ranked." Why would CNBC be wasting their time with no-names who have zero credit? Jesus.
It's because the guys that do matter and have all the credibility could care less about being on CNBC. Let's put it this way. Who are the II ranked analysts' clients? They're the big mutual funds, pension funds, hedge funds, asset managers, etc. Do they watch CNBC to get analysis for stocks? Rarely if ever.
So CNBC will get any analyst they can that covers the name to talk about it. Trust me, these guys they bring on still know what they're talking about, but rarely are they II ranked analysts.
ShawnDU2009 wrote: It's
It's because the guys that do matter and have all the credibility could care less about being on CNBC.
The top analyst for a particular sector works a floor above me and he fucking loves being in the press. I think he was a failed actor in his 20's or something. Just saying......
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
My boss has been on CNBC like
My boss has been on CNBC like 15+ times. It's meaningless
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
UFOinsider
It's because the guys that do matter and have all the credibility could care less about being on CNBC.
The top analyst for a particular sector works a floor above me and he fucking loves being in the press. I think he was a failed actor in his 20's or something. Just saying......
Haha makes sense. There's always exceptions to the rule.
ShawnDU2009
It's because the guys that do matter and have all the credibility could care less about being on CNBC.
The top analyst for a particular sector works a floor above me and he fucking loves being in the press. I think he was a failed actor in his 20's or something. Just saying......
Haha makes sense. There's always exceptions to the rule.
That's why I'm leaning towards ER.....it's a lot less cut and dry than banking [and there's time for a LIFE outside of work]
Wasn't trying to be douchbaggy, just looking to mollify the crossfire a bit. I'll agree with you guys though, that the TOP guys don't give a shit what the press thinks.
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
happypantsmcgee wrote: My
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
UFOinsider
I didn't think to ask my boss
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
Ray Finkle wrote: UFOinsider
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
Could someone explain the
Institutional Investor (II)
thanks
They don't get paid. My boss
Some of them get paid in
buybuybuy wrote: Some of them
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
I was on CNBC last week (have