How Much Value Can One Person Carry For a Brand?

I've always been curious about how things work in the world of C-Suite executives and board of directors. Just when do they make the decision that XYZ, who is the face of the brand, have stayed too long in the game to matter anymore?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014241278873238935045785552617019600…

Today, Men's Wearhouse fired its founder and the face of its brand. Now MW is only a $2 billion company by market cap and even in a forum like WSO shouldn't really garner that prestige frontpage status. However, this is a guy that built his company from scratch, and is the face of the franchise in every meaning in the dictionary. And it's not like the company has been doing poorly in recent years. It's found a niche within itself and performed admirably (granted I'd never be caught in any MW attire).

What I really want to hear from you monkeys: is there any way to value the importance of a single man? Some may say Apple is surviving just fine without Steve Jobs.

Who are some of the other top faces of their respective companies out there? And to what extent would the board suffer any consequences if it canned them?

On top of my head (and mini power ranking with absolutely no methodology whatsoever, because who doesn't love power rankings)

1. Oprah
2. Martha Stewart
3. Elon Musk?
4. Larry and Sergei
5. Zuck?
6. Mark Cuban

 
Best Response

Zuck for sure. Take Cuban completely off the list. The rest are good. The question is really just, if this guy goes away, do people still trust our brand and see it the same way? Then again, people would have thought (and in my opinion they correctly thought) that Steve Jobs's death would kill the Apple brand in some ways. I argue that it did - it effectively called into question Apple's innovation, as SJ was always seen as THE guy when it came to new product development (even though we know that to be false, it was the perception). Bill Gates could die tomorrow and MSFT would be the same, so I don't see that one in the same light. There's plenty of arguments to be made in a ton of different industries... to a lesser extent Elsa Peretti's departure from Tiffany would be a painful blow to the brand but nowhere near crippling, so that's another to consider. But as far as people who ARE the brand and ARE the company... I don't think you can be any more accurate than Oprah and Martha... Richard Branson and Virgin from a purely brand awareness standpoint maybe... but that company would be just fine without him (and is).

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 

Why not Donald Trump?

"It's very easy to have too many goals and be overwhelmed by them... The trick is to find the one thing you can focus on that represents every other single thing you want in life." -- @"Edmundo Braverman"
 

Also Jeff Bezos may not have the name recognition of some CEOs, but he was ranked #1 living CEO by Harvard Business Review. Bazos also was the Time 1999 Person of the Year, and he was the Fortune 2012 Businessperson of the Year.

"It's very easy to have too many goals and be overwhelmed by them... The trick is to find the one thing you can focus on that represents every other single thing you want in life." -- @"Edmundo Braverman"
 

I know this is unrelated to the topic but the "#1 living CEO" thing made me think... I think it's a very close battle between Mike Pearson and Mark Donegan for best CEO in the world right now. Honorable mentions include Will Oberton, Carol Meyrowitz, Al Mulally, and Amancio Ortega

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 
BlackHat:

I know this is unrelated to the topic but the "#1 living CEO" thing made me think... I think it's a very close battle between Mike Pearson and Mark Donegan for best CEO in the world right now. Honorable mentions include Will Oberton, Carol Meyrowitz, Al Mulally, and Amancio Ortega

You guys hear this? That's BlackHat's portfolio in a nutshell. What are y'all waiting for? This post is worth its weight in gold!

 

Musk no doubt.

I know this thread is about C-level ish, but endorsed athletes create tremendous value as well and can make or break a brand. Look at Nike and Jordan. They took a big gamble in the 80s and now have one of the most identifiable brands in the world with Jordan. Also, Tiger made Nike golf relevant, Beckham took Adidas to the next level, and lastly, (not athletes), but Reebok almost became relevant again to younger demographics by signing Swizz Beatz, Tyga, and Rick Ross. If any of the above athletes left their respective endorsers, those brands would take HUGE hits.

Rick Ross was booted by Reebok, and they've taken a hit in marketing to urban teens as a result.

 

To me, the best examples are those where the average customer buys specifically because of the person at the top. So, for me, guys like Bill Gates or Larry/Sergei don't qualify. Oprah and Martha Stewart are the best examples I could think of.

With that in mind, guys like David Einhorn certainly qualify. How many people would stay invested with Greenlight if he left? Contrast that to how many people would stop using Facebook if Zuck left?

I think you could add celebrity chefs to that list as well (guys like Mario Battali).

 
SirTradesaLot:

To me, the best examples are those where the average customer buys specifically because of the person at the top. So, for me, guys like Bill Gates or Larry/Sergei don't qualify. Oprah and Martha Stewart are the best examples I could think of.

With that in mind, guys like David Einhorn certainly qualify. How many people would stay invested with Greenlight if he left? Contrast that to how many people would stop using Facebook if Zuck left?

I think you could add celebrity chefs to that list as well (guys like Mario Battali).

Adding basically one-man operations defeats the purpose a bit, no? That's kind of like saying if Dr. Phil died nobody would watch Dr. Phil anymore. I'd totally agree that the Google guys don't count at all though.

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 
BlackHat:
SirTradesaLot:

To me, the best examples are those where the average customer buys specifically because of the person at the top. So, for me, guys like Bill Gates or Larry/Sergei don't qualify. Oprah and Martha Stewart are the best examples I could think of.

With that in mind, guys like David Einhorn certainly qualify. How many people would stay invested with Greenlight if he left? Contrast that to how many people would stop using Facebook if Zuck left?

I think you could add celebrity chefs to that list as well (guys like Mario Battali).

Adding basically one-man operations defeats the purpose a bit, no? That's kind of like saying if Dr. Phil died nobody would watch Dr. Phil anymore. I'd totally agree that the Google guys don't count at all though.

I don't think I mentioned any one man shops. What I think is perhaps an interesting contrast is Newman's Own. Even though it was started by someone famous, I don't think people bought because of him (could be wrong). I mean, he's dead and I don't think it impacted sales.

Certainly, nobody does business with the major investment or commercial banks based on who is heading the firm.

PS -- Dr. Phil is still around? WTF?

 

Aut soluta aut ullam sed dolor eius consequatur itaque. Autem temporibus et exercitationem inventore.

Soluta quam vel omnis quia velit id omnis. Quasi minus quo id tempora. Cum provident nulla minima non. Adipisci sunt nemo quas repellendus aut in. Cum recusandae et deleniti ipsa. Autem iure unde iure.

Eius soluta fuga inventore aut impedit. Voluptatem minus rerum aut in commodi quod. Eveniet repudiandae ut possimus aspernatur ut. Repellendus voluptatibus quos sed provident nesciunt omnis rerum. Ea quis quas quisquam numquam quas perspiciatis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”