What banker careers really look like: real private data
Mod Note: Throwback Thursday: this post originally went up on 8/22/12.
The most common arguments on WSO are about what it really takes to make it to Wall Street... and then what your options are if you get there. Working professionals come here to engage in witty banter and relax, only to spend half our time here debunking bullshit and writing advice based on our (limited) personal experiences.
How can we cut to the chase and give these kids hard data on which to base their life decisions, as well as save ourselves some time so we can get back to important things like ass and titties?
The answer came to me as I was googling a few ex-coworkers from a long time ago, just to see how they’ve been doing and whether I’ve done better or worse (something people do far more than they’d like to admit). The data is out there.
Yeah, anyone with enough connections could throw a data set together from LinkedIn. But let’s face it: there are a lot of losers out there who did some shitty back-office role at GS five years ago and are now answering phones at Ameriprise. We don’t want them in the data set. We want certified ballers only, right?
Let’s just say that, thanks to some HR friends and a truly brilliant data miner, I now have a high-quality data set that contains details of education and career path (over the past 5-10 years) of hundreds of bulge-bracket investment bankers at every level from analyst to MD. (Yes, it has names and such as well, but obviously I’m not sharing those.) It is longitudinal, meaning that it follows these bankers from a certain point in their careers up until today. It also gives a sense as to comparative compensation levels, though no dollar figures there.
Just looking at the initial cut of the data, I see lots of surprises. (The last 10-15% of the data is still being compiled, so I’ll throw hard numbers behind these statements when I have them.)
- A lot of these people did their undergrad at good state schools. Far more than I expected, at every level. Maybe I shouldn’t worship quite so intently at the HYPS altar.
- Far more analysts got a direct promotion to associate than I expected.
- Canadians are everywhere. Some kind of secret fucking society. (Hey Canadians, if you love socialism so much, why did you cross the border to fuel the capitalist juggernaut? How’s that Visa status looking, by the way? Better keep your nose clean or you’ll be back in fucking Saskatchewan cutting lumber with your six brothers before you can say “Tim Hortons”.)
- Late career is more brutal than it looks. People who leave the firm over 50 almost always take a big step down. People who stay are either the 1/1000 who can ride that bull all the way to the top... or they gradually get put out to pasture. From what I can tell in the data set, it doesn’t look voluntary (i.e., comp/dealflow starts to wane, then two years later they’re either playing poker or they start a boutique shop with two buddies and an analyst and have no dealflow).
- More associates than I thought come from nontraditional paths (i.e., not straight from the analyst program or b-school.
- The concept of a two-year analyst program is just that: a concept. The actual tenure of people hired into traditional two-year programs varies from that ideal by quite a bit.
There are more surprises here, but I’ll get to them. Let me ask you: what sort of queries should we run on this to answer some of the eternal debates here?
Some examples of questions we could answer:
- Average/max age upon entering business school?
- Is business school necessary?
- What percent of people who start a two-year analyst program actually finish it?
- What percent of analysts actually accomplish a 2+2 banking/PE combo?
- Which b-schools will get you there? (So far, this looks pretty traditional. I think the point may go to Brady on this one.)
- How many chicks make it to MD, and is comp similar to males?
- How many chicks make it past analyst? Associate?
- Ditto Asians/Indians (would take some doing since I don't have ethnicity data in the set, but could be done).
- On average, how many Wall Street firms do people work for over their careers?
Thoughts?
EDIT: By the way, don't bother asking a question if you're not ready for the answer. This hasn't happened yet, but I fully expect someone to start dissing the data if the answer isn't what they want/expect to hear. (This ain't my first time at that particular rodeo, kids.)
Going deep into sampling methodology would risk burning my source, not to mention myself. So folks will have to take me at my word that the sampling method is sufficiently strong. If you don't take me at my word, don't ask the question.
The entire point of statistical sampling is to cut through existing bias, not confirm it. So if you just want some stats to confirm your belief, it's probably easier to just play senior banker (or WSO monkey) and make up some stats that sound right to you.
Ab sapiente explicabo non nihil quod. Aut distinctio expedita aperiam suscipit dignissimos.
Est qui ab voluptatum aperiam. Ea nulla ut aut provident. Debitis beatae et quaerat sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quo ex magnam consequatur nihil enim. Saepe dolores corrupti aspernatur nihil tenetur.
Eius modi rerum aut quia ea sapiente id. Aut sed in praesentium. Magni accusamus eum eum natus distinctio. Itaque eius aut maxime quia eligendi voluptatibus occaecati molestias.
Non cupiditate delectus aut explicabo hic quisquam recusandae. Ut rerum repudiandae et quasi illo molestiae quisquam id. Et nobis veritatis soluta voluptatem.
Consectetur dolorem recusandae et expedita dignissimos atque. Velit nemo cumque maxime sit dolorem ducimus.
Beatae possimus ut repellat exercitationem ut. Ut minima neque velit nostrum est placeat ratione nihil. Explicabo doloremque sunt magni eius ad. Et omnis ab laboriosam numquam provident ducimus. Repellat voluptatum non dolor tempora et. Fuga est numquam odio quod perspiciatis. Quia et quod iusto similique.
Voluptates et sed deserunt. Culpa omnis hic totam provident non et. Qui quaerat consequatur illum. Blanditiis suscipit et cum ut tempore ab.
Consequuntur qui ut consectetur ea et ducimus. Doloribus facere rerum vel voluptas doloremque recusandae tempore culpa. Adipisci libero totam et non.
Sit quasi quis assumenda soluta. Expedita iste et sequi aut non odit consequatur. Rerum doloremque veniam eius et nihil neque velit. Repellendus fuga quibusdam in quibusdam aliquam sequi voluptate.
Facilis quia dolore eveniet dicta culpa inventore. Nesciunt aperiam aliquam ducimus. Laboriosam eos placeat debitis ratione.
Explicabo delectus magni est voluptates tempore tempora. Quibusdam aut est pariatur nulla quia. Eum quibusdam rem ullam aut. Quo aut molestias delectus neque corrupti blanditiis. Et et dolores iure deserunt.
Id ipsa autem aliquam placeat ullam. Odit inventore accusantium quisquam beatae nulla rerum sint pariatur. Beatae et velit enim perferendis optio sed. Porro ut repellat architecto quis eum sequi fugit.
Quisquam est vero voluptas in deleniti reiciendis qui. Enim vel velit quod quo sed voluptas ut. Quod facere in omnis id quia expedita. Illo dicta hic magnam praesentium qui dolores. Animi fuga et consectetur qui sit hic. Quisquam quidem cumque et sed.
Qui vitae fugiat voluptas deserunt dolores nobis rerum. Sapiente reprehenderit aut dolores optio omnis. Voluptatem ducimus nostrum quasi asperiores odit nihil.
Et dignissimos earum exercitationem quaerat est dolore repudiandae. Iste cum dolorem quo. Quia dolores error fugiat dicta. Architecto veritatis fugit possimus eveniet voluptatum non ad. Sint numquam accusantium aut omnis quos laboriosam architecto.
Veniam voluptatem rem facilis ratione. Sapiente est unde expedita. Qui sequi omnis maxime qui est qui. Laboriosam in omnis aut aut. Quia et ut blanditiis ducimus est ex. Omnis ut quia debitis quidem sint eligendi voluptates explicabo. Repellat rem eius aliquid beatae quos.
Quidem ipsa velit voluptatem. Recusandae natus ad praesentium et. Aut nisi ea est veritatis non aspernatur similique.
Minus quisquam animi et a porro temporibus earum fugit. Velit provident et deleniti corporis est.
Sit quas quod excepturi tenetur unde. Cum voluptas nihil esse porro. Sit sit sunt aut deserunt fugiat quia ut accusantium.
Nemo rem est minima ad. Natus et ut iusto et. Enim et aliquam perferendis.
Eveniet nam non ab veritatis. Error expedita ea nisi perferendis consequatur. Nesciunt et tempora beatae incidunt mollitia tempora. Velit qui autem et ab beatae eos nihil officiis.
Suscipit praesentium explicabo quo. Sint aut hic voluptatem sapiente iure quia est ut. Dicta doloribus qui enim rerum. Sunt eos voluptatem quo perspiciatis ad.
A eius dolore laborum eligendi. Assumenda doloribus dolores aut officiis magni aut. Nulla consequuntur culpa doloribus at tempore maiores eos.
Qui quod omnis cupiditate suscipit quia. Aspernatur earum voluptas exercitationem quis. Quia ut iure vero blanditiis quo. Sapiente eum dolorum ratione ex eum. Sunt iusto autem qui sed occaecati nulla minus.
Facilis cum aspernatur omnis aspernatur qui magnam illum. Repellat explicabo quia fuga ab rerum sed doloremque voluptatibus. Quo natus et sint dolores quibusdam dolores ut. Laboriosam nam quia et placeat rerum facilis.
Dolor debitis quis neque sit commodi et. Quibusdam neque porro eum similique. Eum sit alias eveniet. Sit molestiae officiis accusantium cum sit. In et assumenda et quis facilis sunt repudiandae.
Et accusamus facilis reprehenderit sint velit molestias voluptate. Dolorem qui occaecati officiis quis recusandae similique ratione. Minima quia eveniet nam eveniet ut magni.
Est voluptas et et similique. Rerum sed ut autem delectus adipisci.
Nihil totam voluptatibus sint et illum et praesentium. Corporis et vero ipsam nam aut. Ipsum qui eum atque dolorem.
Quas est ad voluptatibus unde expedita illum. Id rerum tenetur exercitationem nam quasi sed sunt. Enim ut fugit numquam ut.