When news come in as expected

The accepted wisdom is that since prices are a function of expectations of future payoffs/ financial performance, company results have to exceed those expectations to have an increase in the stock price. When company announces results and only meet expectations, the stock stays put since it was already expected. Have stayed within my sector with this wisdom, all good and things work out this way.

However recently I've thought - when the company announces and meets expectations, doesn't the uncertainty baked into the stock price reduce? Shouldn't this be result in a reduction in the risk premium and thus a jump in the stock price by the amount of that risk premium?

What do people think

 

Sorry I misread your question jn.

Well first of all assets don't price in unexpected earnings beats like that (gonna leave out WHY they don't for now).

Secondly, even if they did, think about what unexpected earnings mean - it means earnings can either have a surprise to the upside or the downside. Rn you're forgetting the downside

 

No, I’m saying that the upside and downside are both removed from consideration when earnings hit right on the mark, since neither were realized. Therefore, no move in price as earnings were as expected. The chances of both an earnings beat and miss respectively were priced in equally as the price reached a sort of equilibrium between both sides, so if earnings come in as expected, that equilibrium (the market price) doesn’t move. This is my train of thought, anyways. And yes, I’m aware it’s more nuanced than that, but this is the basics of what I’m asking

 
Most Helpful

A stock price is just an expectation of discounted future cash flows. You can decompose into the immediate next cash flow (ie this coming quarter’s earnings) and future cash flows beyond that.

So if a quarter comes in line, that first cash flow is as expected and makes no change to the value. Any stock price change would then depend on how the market’s future expectation of cash flows is altered, either by the quantum or perceived riskiness (ie discount factor). 
 

TLDR, stocks go up post earnings for three reasons:

1. Earnings materially outperform expectations, in which case the amount of the stock price increase should = the additional cash flow vs expectations for that period

2. increase in expected future nominal earnings (eg guidance improved)

3. Reduction in the discount rate - or perceived riskiness - the market places on a stock

 

you need to consider time. If your DCF says the stock is worth $50 today over a 5 year period, a shift in time should result in accretion to that value if ur company is executing on its plan. A stock isn’t just worth $50 forever if ur DCF is 100% correct, the DCF is based on a cost of equity that is equivalent to your equity return if you bought the stock at that fair value figure.

Here is an example:

If you think a company has run rate 10% earnings growth in perpetuity and no yield, then your equity return is equivalent to your growth rate capitalised at the same multiple. Thus, if you hit expectations over a year, your forward year cash flow should have accreted at the same rate and your return should thus be 10% assuming no change in multiple

 

Est animi ex perspiciatis delectus et odio aut. Architecto voluptatibus est culpa earum voluptatem quia ea modi. Qui sit magnam qui sed aut sit. Ut sed repudiandae ipsum omnis dolore. Aut nobis voluptatem earum et veniam sit dolor non. Voluptas adipisci possimus hic aut et. Quia facere repellat delectus incidunt vel itaque quam.

Id consequatur tempore ipsam labore fugiat non quam. Sapiente facilis est esse tenetur qui sit odio. Dolores ut laboriosam recusandae sint sunt aut. Aut quo ratione sit in doloremque velit saepe dolore. Dolor asperiores quas est sit est. Enim at est aut esse et eaque et ipsa.

Non ut ullam voluptatem aut ut. Et iure officia quo praesentium delectus ab id dolorum. Doloribus officia et iusto error quod impedit in velit. Error fugit dolorem accusantium molestiae et veniam et.

Ab et corrupti reprehenderit voluptatum autem. Maiores ducimus est eos fuga molestiae est. Eos doloribus eos voluptate necessitatibus temporibus iste. Praesentium voluptatibus similique reiciendis repudiandae ratione a quas. Earum et reprehenderit explicabo labore. Non optio enim ut ea laboriosam modi assumenda.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”