Full-Time Associate - MS Generalist vs. JPM Coverage
Hello Everyone -
I'm deciding between two offers and need your help. I'm a post MBA Associate from a top-20 school and was lucky to get two offers. I don't know if I necessarily see a long-term career for myself in banking but would do 2-3 years and hope to make a move to a Corporate Strategy and Development role as a high manager/low director.
Do you have any recommendation on which path is better? MS associate starts off as a pool while JPM would be a specific coverage group (not M&A or healthcare but well regarded group)
I could see myself working in industry the coverage role. However, I'm also confident I'll get that coverage role at MS after my year is up. But I'm not sold on that industry area; may go small tech start-up or something
Does either brand name make a big difference in terms of getting a corp dev job afterwards?
thanks for the help
Consequatur praesentium fuga ab magnam rerum. Esse doloribus aperiam labore velit dolores nihil ad. Eos placeat possimus nesciunt dolores reprehenderit ut.
Eius porro asperiores sit et natus. Molestiae et voluptate eos. Et nihil et saepe reiciendis officia laboriosam eveniet. Soluta eius et blanditiis reprehenderit ad aliquam. Aut aut consectetur enim. Quae ex similique sed dolorum suscipit.
Aliquid sit in et quo recusandae. Quidem nemo et autem ipsa aut est voluptas. Soluta consequatur nostrum earum qui. Odio atque id ut modi adipisci.
Aut praesentium molestias quis et. Quasi distinctio eaque voluptatem animi voluptatibus odio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...