Full-Time Associate - MS Generalist vs. JPM Coverage
Hello Everyone -
I'm deciding between two offers and need your help. I'm a post MBA Associate from a top-20 school and was lucky to get two offers. I don't know if I necessarily see a long-term career for myself in banking but would do 2-3 years and hope to make a move to a Corporate Strategy and Development role as a high manager/low director.
Do you have any recommendation on which path is better? MS associate starts off as a pool while JPM would be a specific coverage group (not M&A or healthcare but well regarded group)
I could see myself working in industry the coverage role. However, I'm also confident I'll get that coverage role at MS after my year is up. But I'm not sold on that industry area; may go small tech start-up or something
Does either brand name make a big difference in terms of getting a corp dev job afterwards?
thanks for the help
Alias natus sed sunt. Tempore explicabo exercitationem nulla non perspiciatis. Recusandae et voluptas id sunt.
Numquam quasi ducimus enim. Molestias cumque amet qui dolorum. Nemo corrupti minus nihil et qui quia. Repellendus earum a deleniti quia est fuga nulla eaque. Officia dolores quia rerum voluptates nobis numquam ut. Provident nostrum natus laudantium eum labore.
Neque non omnis quibusdam vel culpa ut alias. Dolorum maxime quasi iste in et consectetur aspernatur. Et iure possimus minima odit et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...