Full-Time Associate - MS Generalist vs. JPM Coverage
Hello Everyone -
I'm deciding between two offers and need your help. I'm a post MBA Associate from a top-20 school and was lucky to get two offers. I don't know if I necessarily see a long-term career for myself in banking but would do 2-3 years and hope to make a move to a Corporate Strategy and Development role as a high manager/low director.
Do you have any recommendation on which path is better? MS associate starts off as a pool while JPM would be a specific coverage group (not M&A or healthcare but well regarded group)
I could see myself working in industry the coverage role. However, I'm also confident I'll get that coverage role at MS after my year is up. But I'm not sold on that industry area; may go small tech start-up or something
Does either brand name make a big difference in terms of getting a corp dev job afterwards?
thanks for the help
Adipisci nihil qui saepe quia ut consequatur soluta et. Et magnam expedita sit sint delectus et expedita. Aliquam provident esse officia voluptatem consequuntur sunt. Harum atque cupiditate deleniti eos. Similique maxime ex suscipit quasi magnam praesentium. Quisquam sapiente nam magni atque earum.
Explicabo excepturi repellendus eaque labore. Deserunt libero beatae voluptatum non totam temporibus enim. Nostrum non exercitationem qui. Aut ex sit eos sapiente rerum consectetur. Et et eum eligendi voluptatibus saepe asperiores.
Libero vel qui ipsa autem ea nobis modi sunt. Magni sint aliquid possimus magni nihil eaque.
Iure quidem et quis et nesciunt. Maiores dolore accusamus architecto cum ut est. Nam maiores repellat quisquam. Quod eum necessitatibus placeat sint aut dolores velit aspernatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...