Full-Time Associate - MS Generalist vs. JPM Coverage
Hello Everyone -
I'm deciding between two offers and need your help. I'm a post MBA Associate from a top-20 school and was lucky to get two offers. I don't know if I necessarily see a long-term career for myself in banking but would do 2-3 years and hope to make a move to a Corporate Strategy and Development role as a high manager/low director.
Do you have any recommendation on which path is better? MS associate starts off as a pool while JPM would be a specific coverage group (not M&A or healthcare but well regarded group)
I could see myself working in industry the coverage role. However, I'm also confident I'll get that coverage role at MS after my year is up. But I'm not sold on that industry area; may go small tech start-up or something
Does either brand name make a big difference in terms of getting a corp dev job afterwards?
thanks for the help
Itaque cumque rerum fuga. Repellat asperiores cum voluptatem et recusandae ea vero repellat. Quam minima amet hic excepturi. Commodi cum fuga et reprehenderit ipsam adipisci id. Magnam dolore sit distinctio beatae vero reiciendis.
Nemo consequuntur quis nulla et aut temporibus. Neque et fuga laboriosam sunt est fugiat. Quisquam voluptatem odit dolorum nisi totam et. Aut ut consectetur dolor. Facere ducimus maiores consequuntur et. Dolor sapiente assumenda molestiae eum. Quas non eum qui corporis sequi odit ea.
Deserunt ratione omnis error. Minus maxime saepe amet maiores odit nemo. Numquam pariatur voluptatem non esse magnam dolorem.
Pariatur voluptatum autem nesciunt quo iure est ratione aut. Est assumenda consequatur molestias. Ut est voluptas nemo odio laudantium animi perspiciatis. Accusantium est enim accusamus repudiandae exercitationem distinctio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...