Which offer, RBS or FSA?
I'm wondering which internship is better for me - RBS Risk or Financial Services Aurothity (FSA) in the Risk or Supervisory unit. I can't be more specific, as the exact divisions are not yet confirmed. Both are in London. I'm considering working in risk at the moment, but i might do a finance masters after my degree and look at something else.
Obviously RBS is 83% state owned and people on this site seem to think it's a last resort. They refer to talent leaving the bank in droves and uncertainty over pay and bonuses.
The FSA internship is in the main office in Canary Wharf. I imagine it would be quite valuable elsewhere to have worked closely with something like Solvency II. But what with the disbanding/restructuring of the FSA, I'm not sure if this affects the chances of being offered a graduate position after the internship?
I'm wondering which is more prestigious in the finance world? Which is a more valuable experience? Which has better career prospects for the future if I am offered to stay on?
Any input would be much appreciated.. :-)
what's wrong with RBS?
Nothing at all is wrong with RBS, infact I really like the environment I'd be working in. I was just wondering which option is looked upon as better in The City.
In et quisquam magni assumenda qui aspernatur et dolorem. Est ea adipisci mollitia. Eius facilis illum repudiandae rerum qui hic laudantium. Architecto at voluptas assumenda inventore vel error fugiat.
Eveniet omnis eum officiis in eius sunt ut. Quae quisquam beatae minima earum impedit distinctio. Est omnis unde nesciunt consequatur quia aliquam neque nobis. Aliquam eligendi ex rerum consequuntur laboriosam.
Laudantium molestias rerum iure dolor quisquam. Ex ut et deserunt natus recusandae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...