Anybody have a minority growth equity model example / test? Interviewing soon

Have an upcoming interview at a large growth firm. It's a 90 minute test, from scratch. Anybody have resources to prep? Thank you!

For an associate role

Mod alert: We have announced a PE Interview boot camp for July 21, 2023. Check it out here: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/courses/live-training/private-equity-interview-bootcamp. Happy recruiting!

Mod alert 2: The Bootcamp is sold out. If you couldn't get a seat, please check out our PE interview Course. Good luck with the interviews!

 

If you are interviewing at a large firm, I would start with understanding the types of the deals that they do. Many of the larger firms will use some debt for “growth buyout” deals and the modeling is essentially the same as an LBO. GE may have some structure to their equity investments (particularly in minority deals), so know how to model common features like liquidation preference in your return analysis.

 

For "classic" growth equity (Series C-F), essence of the modeling is low-gearing PE. Should have triggers for rev or ebitda defined equity ratchet but otherwise same model you'd use to prep for a buyout shop. Good luck brother.

 
Most Helpful

Given the test is only 90 minutes, it will likely be a pretty straightforward linking of the statements and calculating a MOIC and IRR. However, there are a few things that growth equity firms put into their modeling test that deviate from standard LBO models: (1) Primary vs. Secondary Equity Purchases and (2) Liquidation Preferences.

I've provided example questions and solutions below for both of these features. Also, I'm always happy to help, so let me know if you have any questions. If you want the Excel and case study that I used for the below exhibits, just PM me (open to anyone).

Special Feature 1: Primary vs. Secondary Equity Purchases  

Description

Primary equity involves the issuance of new equity by the company, thereby increasing the company’s equity value. A secondary equity transaction consists of the purchase of existing shares from current investors (usually at a discount to pre-money equity value) in the business and therefore does not increase the equity value of the company

Secondary share purchases from employees/founders do not come with liquidation preferences or any other special terms since they are just common shares. Accordingly, firms that have conviction on the upside potential of the investment might want to purchase more secondary shares (as they capture upside through the discounted price of the shares)

Modeling Prompt Question 

It has been indicated that our firm could participate in a Series D round that is expected to be comprised of $50 million of primary equity issued at a $500 million pre-money valuation. Additionally, one of the founders has indicated he is willing to sell $30 million of secondary equity to our firm at a $350 million equity value.

After participating in both the primary equity issuance and secondary sale, how much of the company would our firm own on a post-money basis?

Modeling Prompt Solution

image-20230527044359-2

Special Feature 2: Liquidation Preference

Description

A liquidation preference is an instrument typical in early-stage growth investments, whereby a new investor is guaranteed a minimum return on their investment at the exit. The liquidation preference is junior to all debt-like instruments in the capital structure but effectively ranks senior to ordinary equity.

Modeling Prompt Question 

Building off the example above, your firm is considering asking the company to add a 2.0x liquidation preference to the primary equity portion of the investment (i.e., the $50 million). 

To assess the value of a 2.0x liquidation on the primary equity component, please contemplate a downside scenario where the business is sold for $600 million. Calculate our firm's return on investment (MOM and IRR) both with and without the 2.0x liquidation preference on the primary equity component.

Modeling Prompt Solution

image-20230527044523-4

image-20230527044548-5

image-20230527045010-8

Array
 

Genuinely shocked at how much you went out of your way to share such insights, please could you send across the materials via PM? I'm currently interviewing for a few top GE funds atm, and getting close to the Case Study stage, so would be a massive help. Thanks in advance!

 

Why isn't the secondary being diluted by the Liq Pref? That true-up should dilute all others holder? Case is silent on where secondary ranks.

Distributable Equity value = $544.1

Proceeds to Series D with Liq Pred = $100 (49.5+100)

Remain Pot =  $444.1

Secondary Stake of Remaining Pot = 8.6% / (1-9.1%)= 9.46%. That is once D is paid, we have claim to 9.46% of the remaining pot

9.46% *($544.1 - 100) = $41.9 or 1.4x MOIC on secondary.

My issue with above table in your post is that you can't true-up without taking it away from others...

 

Good point on the liquidation preference needing to dilute other holders. 

Question though - if you're reducing Distributable Equity Value by the liquidation preference (Primary), why also adjust the Secondary % Equity Ownership?  Wouldn't it just be the Secondary's equity ownership applied to a now-smaller Distributable Equity Value (e.g. $444.1)?  Doing both feels like double-counting; please help if I'm missing something.

 

Hi,

I know I am a bit late, but would you mind sharing this with me? Would really appreciate it. God bless!

 

I hope everyone asking for the model has at least tried to recreate the exercise themselves first…

 

Voluptatem sit pariatur sit placeat ut sed et. Ratione quo consequatur est voluptates animi.

Voluptas itaque qui assumenda iste corporis consequatur. Officiis deserunt nisi necessitatibus et nam sint deserunt. Et maiores commodi maxime incidunt ut. Nulla veniam nulla ut consequatur delectus omnis doloremque. Occaecati aliquid asperiores eum adipisci incidunt aliquid voluptatum. Et sed dolores qui sed.

Nulla molestiae perspiciatis quia et et. Perferendis delectus possimus similique rerum. Eum nulla pariatur velit aut.

 

Explicabo et et voluptatem sunt recusandae fuga. Ipsa eum est ut id. Id dolores perspiciatis quo laudantium rerum culpa ipsum.

Enim suscipit aliquam consequuntur est. Dolorem enim vel enim itaque sit est. Libero dolor dolor sequi omnis similique architecto.

Recusandae id qui praesentium est similique doloremque maiores. In molestias maxime nulla omnis. Eveniet repellat reiciendis aperiam ab cumque. Quis voluptatum omnis nesciunt optio voluptatem non recusandae.

Array
 

Praesentium tempora eos modi veritatis nobis quod. Ipsam possimus quo optio perferendis at. Quis omnis animi dolor laudantium at eius.

Dicta tenetur voluptatibus iusto a alias explicabo. Totam ratione ratione expedita molestiae deleniti ipsa neque aliquid. Laborum nobis quo porro iusto minima. Sunt porro id aut rerum nesciunt saepe consequuntur. Voluptatem sequi magni quisquam quisquam quia exercitationem unde.

Eaque ut quod facilis. Esse perspiciatis non delectus. Dignissimos qui autem dicta excepturi sed. Eum nam quia odit sed qui non numquam qui.

Iure ipsum aperiam quae qui quae. Ab nam consectetur odit nostrum. Et minus et deleniti debitis et. A et ut reiciendis ut occaecati et maxime perferendis.

 

Saepe quae ea assumenda maiores commodi iure incidunt. Id dolorem sit ut. Facere quis veniam velit odio ut.

Ullam aut consequuntur occaecati. Velit perspiciatis reiciendis ut voluptatum laudantium ipsa nisi. Et voluptatem illum qui. Asperiores ratione et enim sit est. Omnis ducimus eaque dolorem ut sunt deserunt nulla. Ea nostrum dolor perferendis quaerat aliquid.

Nemo dolores officiis quo. Soluta perspiciatis magni exercitationem et ut. Iure ipsum molestiae sapiente vel suscipit reprehenderit quae. Eligendi asperiores dolor molestias eos sint nisi. Assumenda excepturi qui placeat necessitatibus.

 

Inventore et doloribus adipisci sapiente veniam est nobis. Sequi modi sapiente voluptatem sunt aut. Magni est ex ut fugiat quos. Pariatur mollitia modi non recusandae eos in quasi at. Minima enim sunt soluta reprehenderit earum. Illo quia totam est facilis voluptatem.

Tenetur nostrum quae omnis fugit. Asperiores et unde quia iste distinctio. Perspiciatis beatae atque rerum sit reiciendis sint. Quia amet autem quo quia rerum officiis ab.

Hic enim perferendis adipisci quam quo. Cupiditate nesciunt est adipisci rerum suscipit neque porro. Rem id quia vel quia consequatur cupiditate. Adipisci ea qui ea aut. Ut deleniti ipsam saepe ea.

Array
 

Rerum quis ut omnis. Aut est est nobis quae ut non et qui.

Quidem rerum id sapiente fuga explicabo. Enim nihil a ad quod sit et iste repellendus. Ipsam perspiciatis mollitia quos corrupti magni. Est dicta blanditiis aut odit reprehenderit quae.

Asperiores voluptatem quos quae a rerum architecto et. Ut et magnam quaerat. Aspernatur delectus voluptas earum rerum ut. Minus vero sed aut vero ex.

 

Repellendus voluptatem aperiam accusantium recusandae officiis cumque et. Consequatur labore mollitia nesciunt modi. Velit quae vel asperiores adipisci voluptate nihil eos. Odio neque veritatis dolores unde molestias et et qui.

Dolor est debitis ea exercitationem quaerat laboriosam animi. Ut provident aut et ut. Aspernatur magnam vel quia voluptas quasi ab. Qui doloremque id dolores neque ab reiciendis qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”