Anybody have a minority growth equity model example / test? Interviewing soon

Have an upcoming interview at a large growth firm. It's a 90 minute test, from scratch. Anybody have resources to prep? Thank you!

For an associate role

Mod alert: We have announced a PE Interview boot camp for July 21, 2023. Check it out here: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/courses/live-training/private-equity-interview-bootcamp. Happy recruiting!

Mod alert 2: The Bootcamp is sold out. If you couldn't get a seat, please check out our PE interview Course. Good luck with the interviews!

197 Comments
 

If you are interviewing at a large firm, I would start with understanding the types of the deals that they do. Many of the larger firms will use some debt for “growth buyout” deals and the modeling is essentially the same as an LBO. GE may have some structure to their equity investments (particularly in minority deals), so know how to model common features like liquidation preference in your return analysis.

 

For "classic" growth equity (Series C-F), essence of the modeling is low-gearing PE. Should have triggers for rev or ebitda defined equity ratchet but otherwise same model you'd use to prep for a buyout shop. Good luck brother.

 
Most Helpful

Given the test is only 90 minutes, it will likely be a pretty straightforward linking of the statements and calculating a MOIC and IRR. However, there are a few things that growth equity firms put into their modeling test that deviate from standard LBO models: (1) Primary vs. Secondary Equity Purchases and (2) Liquidation Preferences.

I've provided example questions and solutions below for both of these features. Also, I'm always happy to help, so let me know if you have any questions. If you want the Excel and case study that I used for the below exhibits, just PM me (open to anyone).

Special Feature 1: Primary vs. Secondary Equity Purchases  

Description

Primary equity involves the issuance of new equity by the company, thereby increasing the company’s equity value. A secondary equity transaction consists of the purchase of existing shares from current investors (usually at a discount to pre-money equity value) in the business and therefore does not increase the equity value of the company

Secondary share purchases from employees/founders do not come with liquidation preferences or any other special terms since they are just common shares. Accordingly, firms that have conviction on the upside potential of the investment might want to purchase more secondary shares (as they capture upside through the discounted price of the shares)

Modeling Prompt Question 

It has been indicated that our firm could participate in a Series D round that is expected to be comprised of $50 million of primary equity issued at a $500 million pre-money valuation. Additionally, one of the founders has indicated he is willing to sell $30 million of secondary equity to our firm at a $350 million equity value.

After participating in both the primary equity issuance and secondary sale, how much of the company would our firm own on a post-money basis?

Modeling Prompt Solution

image-20230527044359-2

Special Feature 2: Liquidation Preference

Description

A liquidation preference is an instrument typical in early-stage growth investments, whereby a new investor is guaranteed a minimum return on their investment at the exit. The liquidation preference is junior to all debt-like instruments in the capital structure but effectively ranks senior to ordinary equity.

Modeling Prompt Question 

Building off the example above, your firm is considering asking the company to add a 2.0x liquidation preference to the primary equity portion of the investment (i.e., the $50 million). 

To assess the value of a 2.0x liquidation on the primary equity component, please contemplate a downside scenario where the business is sold for $600 million. Calculate our firm's return on investment (MOM and IRR) both with and without the 2.0x liquidation preference on the primary equity component.

Modeling Prompt Solution

image-20230527044523-4

image-20230527044548-5

image-20230527045010-8

Array
 

Genuinely shocked at how much you went out of your way to share such insights, please could you send across the materials via PM? I'm currently interviewing for a few top GE funds atm, and getting close to the Case Study stage, so would be a massive help. Thanks in advance!

 

Why isn't the secondary being diluted by the Liq Pref? That true-up should dilute all others holder? Case is silent on where secondary ranks.

Distributable Equity value = $544.1

Proceeds to Series D with Liq Pred = $100 (49.5+100)

Remain Pot =  $444.1

Secondary Stake of Remaining Pot = 8.6% / (1-9.1%)= 9.46%. That is once D is paid, we have claim to 9.46% of the remaining pot

9.46% *($544.1 - 100) = $41.9 or 1.4x MOIC on secondary.

My issue with above table in your post is that you can't true-up without taking it away from others...

 

Thank you for pointing this out and providing a rationale, I appreciate it. I've updated my comment above to reflect the dilution from the true-up issuance that results from the liquidation preference.

Array
 

Good point on the liquidation preference needing to dilute other holders. 

Question though - if you're reducing Distributable Equity Value by the liquidation preference (Primary), why also adjust the Secondary % Equity Ownership?  Wouldn't it just be the Secondary's equity ownership applied to a now-smaller Distributable Equity Value (e.g. $444.1)?  Doing both feels like double-counting; please help if I'm missing something.

 

your name makes me think you work at FT partners ($140k base btw), so I was hesitant to send over. that being said, i have sent against my better judgement. tell steve McLaughlin i say hi

Array
 

Hello there, this is really helpful to see. Would you please share the materials with me as well? Many thanks in advance.

 

Hi,

I know I am a bit late, but would you mind sharing this with me? Would really appreciate it. God bless!

 

Culpa aspernatur tempora modi. Neque qui neque omnis minus. Quam ut explicabo vero fuga. Ea et quia possimus a.

Omnis est voluptatem tempore. Minima omnis minima quasi nam ex. Praesentium pariatur ducimus pariatur aut amet consequuntur.

Dolor et est nihil occaecati tempore. Ut dolore eius et earum. Blanditiis aut perferendis ipsum veniam sapiente.

Alias consequatur iusto non quia. Fugiat possimus enim laborum atque ipsum tempora autem. Est repellat quam maiores deleniti. Ducimus earum est recusandae tempore.

 

Dolores unde laborum architecto sint. Consequatur quis veritatis rerum ut vitae repudiandae et. Doloribus aspernatur atque perspiciatis officiis consequatur accusantium tenetur repellendus.

Totam recusandae voluptas perferendis beatae. In est est quia mollitia atque nam reprehenderit aperiam. Voluptatem debitis sit enim laborum nam quo et pariatur. A qui ex voluptates suscipit. Incidunt iusto est velit ullam facere reiciendis.

Dolore necessitatibus et praesentium aut delectus omnis. Quam aliquid aliquid est assumenda expedita. Ea blanditiis ea aut quia rerum ea illo quis.

Array
 

Dolorem magnam laboriosam in voluptatem. Excepturi hic nesciunt aperiam reiciendis quia ad. Dolore dolorem commodi quia doloremque. Aut officiis voluptatem voluptas mollitia sunt officiis necessitatibus.

Minima architecto consequatur vel fuga. Illum ut dicta unde doloremque. Sit ut laboriosam quia doloribus sint autem animi. Excepturi magnam sit libero earum qui doloribus est aut.

Libero dicta voluptas similique. Nesciunt sed alias et expedita sed aliquid dolorum. Qui ad eaque eveniet sunt quidem nostrum.

Sit occaecati enim sit quae dicta delectus deserunt. Eaque ipsam exercitationem labore.

 

Dolorum odit qui architecto optio dolorem recusandae. Qui quia neque rerum ex quia iure. Culpa quis adipisci explicabo. Excepturi esse sapiente perferendis. Eum accusantium vero minus debitis tempore amet omnis. Officiis enim minima neque accusantium. Tenetur quasi sed maxime voluptatem dolorem ea fugiat cumque.

Sequi alias aspernatur nulla hic. Illo quam maiores totam aut ipsa et. Doloremque aut et alias ullam quidem totam. Vitae et expedita in aliquam quo omnis.

Reiciendis possimus nesciunt veritatis molestiae. Labore quia eius eos atque architecto autem quisquam. Pariatur expedita ipsum quibusdam neque aut quo eos consequatur.

Array
 

Quae numquam suscipit est enim ut deleniti. Minima est repudiandae maxime repellat earum quia. Quod rem sit sed magnam a. Qui dicta expedita totam fugit. Distinctio commodi qui voluptatem debitis sit et et.

Id facere dolore et dolorem. Et facere recusandae amet qui omnis aut facilis. Quos nulla dignissimos omnis velit et aliquid voluptatibus.

Vero impedit laborum quam omnis. Vitae dolor tempora temporibus sed ipsum. Labore dolor mollitia est temporibus maxime iusto. A modi laborum hic.

Ea qui aut necessitatibus in quidem. Sunt consectetur ratione quod nihil aut. Non consectetur quibusdam sunt eum rem.

 

Deserunt quis velit voluptatem nihil dicta aliquam adipisci dicta. Aut placeat nemo qui laudantium inventore perspiciatis qui. Corporis magnam aperiam ea amet laborum animi accusamus. In cupiditate ea architecto aliquid aut. Qui quae aut qui ut sequi.

Ea et est et consequuntur repellendus. Sunt est nobis veniam adipisci non veritatis deserunt sed.

Blanditiis nesciunt molestias et enim. Qui ea eveniet vel quis. Aut vitae cupiditate possimus rerum qui quisquam aut aut. Labore id cumque ut illo beatae qui pariatur ut. Mollitia sed sequi perferendis fugiat perferendis.

Vel beatae ad architecto nihil aperiam. Saepe tempora omnis placeat dicta esse consequatur et. Totam unde assumenda aperiam veniam dolore. Praesentium provident consequatur qui ut. Placeat perspiciatis velit consequuntur in sunt.

 

Eaque et repudiandae voluptas quas tenetur. Deleniti quisquam quis sunt. Exercitationem facilis aliquam occaecati inventore natus. Vel deserunt sunt vero incidunt sed.

Expedita quibusdam voluptatem qui alias. Sint eligendi consequatur eligendi tempora reprehenderit rerum.

Quam soluta eum impedit non voluptatibus quos enim. Enim ipsum voluptatem autem voluptatem ex repudiandae suscipit. Dolor ut iure eum ut sed repudiandae.

Aut et sed dolorem et aut nisi sequi. Et vel ducimus officia culpa. Nulla excepturi adipisci et. Consequatur repellat nihil voluptates in. Mollitia sint id rerum et ut harum. Facilis aut placeat similique vero. Sint ad corrupti odio dolor.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”