Anybody have a minority growth equity model example / test? Interviewing soon

Have an upcoming interview at a large growth firm. It's a 90 minute test, from scratch. Anybody have resources to prep? Thank you!

For an associate role

Mod alert: We have announced a PE Interview boot camp for July 21, 2023. Check it out here: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/courses/live-training/private-equity-interview-bootcamp. Happy recruiting!

Mod alert 2: The Bootcamp is sold out. If you couldn't get a seat, please check out our PE interview Course. Good luck with the interviews!

197 Comments
 

If you are interviewing at a large firm, I would start with understanding the types of the deals that they do. Many of the larger firms will use some debt for “growth buyout” deals and the modeling is essentially the same as an LBO. GE may have some structure to their equity investments (particularly in minority deals), so know how to model common features like liquidation preference in your return analysis.

 

For "classic" growth equity (Series C-F), essence of the modeling is low-gearing PE. Should have triggers for rev or ebitda defined equity ratchet but otherwise same model you'd use to prep for a buyout shop. Good luck brother.

 
Most Helpful

Given the test is only 90 minutes, it will likely be a pretty straightforward linking of the statements and calculating a MOIC and IRR. However, there are a few things that growth equity firms put into their modeling test that deviate from standard LBO models: (1) Primary vs. Secondary Equity Purchases and (2) Liquidation Preferences.

I've provided example questions and solutions below for both of these features. Also, I'm always happy to help, so let me know if you have any questions. If you want the Excel and case study that I used for the below exhibits, just PM me (open to anyone).

Special Feature 1: Primary vs. Secondary Equity Purchases  

Description

Primary equity involves the issuance of new equity by the company, thereby increasing the company’s equity value. A secondary equity transaction consists of the purchase of existing shares from current investors (usually at a discount to pre-money equity value) in the business and therefore does not increase the equity value of the company

Secondary share purchases from employees/founders do not come with liquidation preferences or any other special terms since they are just common shares. Accordingly, firms that have conviction on the upside potential of the investment might want to purchase more secondary shares (as they capture upside through the discounted price of the shares)

Modeling Prompt – Question 

It has been indicated that our firm could participate in a Series D round that is expected to be comprised of $50 million of primary equity issued at a $500 million pre-money valuation. Additionally, one of the founders has indicated he is willing to sell $30 million of secondary equity to our firm at a $350 million equity value.

After participating in both the primary equity issuance and secondary sale, how much of the company would our firm own on a post-money basis?

Modeling Prompt – Solution

image-20230527044359-2

Special Feature 2: Liquidation Preference

Description

A liquidation preference is an instrument typical in early-stage growth investments, whereby a new investor is guaranteed a minimum return on their investment at the exit. The liquidation preference is junior to all debt-like instruments in the capital structure but effectively ranks senior to ordinary equity.

Modeling Prompt – Question 

Building off the example above, your firm is considering asking the company to add a 2.0x liquidation preference to the primary equity portion of the investment (i.e., the $50 million). 

To assess the value of a 2.0x liquidation on the primary equity component, please contemplate a downside scenario where the business is sold for $600 million. Calculate our firm's return on investment (MOM and IRR) both with and without the 2.0x liquidation preference on the primary equity component.

Modeling Prompt – Solution

image-20230527044523-4

image-20230527044548-5

image-20230527045010-8

Array
 

Genuinely shocked at how much you went out of your way to share such insights, please could you send across the materials via PM? I'm currently interviewing for a few top GE funds atm, and getting close to the Case Study stage, so would be a massive help. Thanks in advance!

 

Why isn't the secondary being diluted by the Liq Pref? That true-up should dilute all others holder? Case is silent on where secondary ranks.

Distributable Equity value = $544.1

Proceeds to Series D with Liq Pred = $100 (49.5+100)

Remain Pot =  $444.1

Secondary Stake of Remaining Pot = 8.6% / (1-9.1%)= 9.46%. That is once D is paid, we have claim to 9.46% of the remaining pot

9.46% *($544.1 - 100) = $41.9 or 1.4x MOIC on secondary.

My issue with above table in your post is that you can't true-up without taking it away from others...

 

Thank you for pointing this out and providing a rationale, I appreciate it. I've updated my comment above to reflect the dilution from the true-up issuance that results from the liquidation preference.

Array
 

Good point on the liquidation preference needing to dilute other holders. 

Question though - if you're reducing Distributable Equity Value by the liquidation preference (Primary), why also adjust the Secondary % Equity Ownership?  Wouldn't it just be the Secondary's equity ownership applied to a now-smaller Distributable Equity Value (e.g. $444.1)?  Doing both feels like double-counting; please help if I'm missing something.

 

your name makes me think you work at FT partners ($140k base btw), so I was hesitant to send over. that being said, i have sent against my better judgement. tell steve McLaughlin i say hi

Array
 

Hello there, this is really helpful to see. Would you please share the materials with me as well? Many thanks in advance.

 

Hi,

I know I am a bit late, but would you mind sharing this with me? Would really appreciate it. God bless!

 

Nostrum ut doloremque cupiditate aliquid. Ut consequatur et quia ipsum consequuntur deleniti et. Ducimus dolor laboriosam quam at. Repudiandae sequi repudiandae repellat repellendus autem. Eos reiciendis consequatur voluptatem et. Doloribus debitis earum et velit vel labore.

Ducimus labore rem voluptatem eum illo sit delectus. Accusantium eos dolores odit totam voluptatum. Dolores ut autem libero tempore porro amet. Dolores placeat ullam sequi ut.

Delectus ratione et ipsa dolores. Aliquam et ut velit saepe odio mollitia. Est ipsam quia nemo fuga. Possimus dolores temporibus aperiam veniam libero aut. Ratione magnam et velit et consectetur id.

 

Iusto accusantium non dolores maxime magni nisi aliquam. Impedit est rem ut enim delectus asperiores saepe.

Accusantium est molestias molestias eius. Sunt ut quis beatae sunt molestias amet commodi. Fugiat alias odio doloribus quaerat eveniet doloremque quia non.

Corrupti temporibus officia nisi ut dolor. Eos tempore quis in dolor. Ut quis odit modi dolorem. Rerum dolore accusamus animi autem totam perspiciatis. Asperiores nihil asperiores et.

Voluptatem est voluptas quo et nam mollitia. Quasi molestiae expedita ut. Aut dolore sit dignissimos nam enim tempore. Possimus tempore asperiores qui ipsam dolor. Sed quis tempore et. Voluptas repellendus et blanditiis ex soluta.

Array
 

In hic quis repellendus ab. Et exercitationem et perspiciatis dolor. Similique quasi saepe et qui recusandae nisi iure.

Vitae quam facere eos dolore. Et doloribus commodi in aut aut deserunt delectus. Hic harum consequatur aut adipisci consequatur quidem quisquam.

Et omnis dolorem soluta enim optio. Ut autem distinctio qui nobis sed est eligendi. Eveniet atque et inventore totam necessitatibus expedita cum. Odio veniam dolores velit ut est vero vero et.

 

Ut eius ex nulla unde. Vel reiciendis consequatur enim dolor ab ut. Quos voluptate doloribus modi iste amet ipsam soluta accusamus.

Et eaque aliquid maxime nobis nobis. Sint sit iure consequuntur laudantium iusto. Harum qui dolores est eaque ut ducimus. Totam vel repellat est consectetur. Eum nesciunt odit eligendi exercitationem aut. Id laudantium eos itaque et.

Suscipit iste voluptatum vel quo aut. Facere omnis accusamus quaerat culpa accusamus cupiditate laudantium. Dignissimos voluptatem iusto ab voluptas voluptatem debitis nam. Et dolor incidunt facilis eveniet tempore qui occaecati ut. Veniam voluptatem voluptatem illo assumenda ut. Est repellendus nam animi adipisci suscipit est sit esse.

Saepe blanditiis sit molestiae ut blanditiis qui delectus. Provident quis voluptas reprehenderit dolores neque rem et. Adipisci reprehenderit assumenda facere consequatur doloremque quaerat. Vero dolor voluptate esse est saepe aut rerum et. Quas debitis et dolorum aut aliquam. A sint est labore quia nesciunt rerum. Omnis autem veritatis nesciunt dignissimos soluta id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.2%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (236) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (40) $79
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”