Anybody have a minority growth equity model example / test? Interviewing soon

Have an upcoming interview at a large growth firm. It's a 90 minute test, from scratch. Anybody have resources to prep? Thank you!

For an associate role

Mod alert: We have announced a PE Interview boot camp for July 21, 2023. Check it out here: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/courses/live-training/private-equity-interview-bootcamp. Happy recruiting!

Mod alert 2: The Bootcamp is sold out. If you couldn't get a seat, please check out our PE interview Course. Good luck with the interviews!

 

If you are interviewing at a large firm, I would start with understanding the types of the deals that they do. Many of the larger firms will use some debt for “growth buyout” deals and the modeling is essentially the same as an LBO. GE may have some structure to their equity investments (particularly in minority deals), so know how to model common features like liquidation preference in your return analysis.

 

For "classic" growth equity (Series C-F), essence of the modeling is low-gearing PE. Should have triggers for rev or ebitda defined equity ratchet but otherwise same model you'd use to prep for a buyout shop. Good luck brother.

 
Most Helpful

Given the test is only 90 minutes, it will likely be a pretty straightforward linking of the statements and calculating a MOIC and IRR. However, there are a few things that growth equity firms put into their modeling test that deviate from standard LBO models: (1) Primary vs. Secondary Equity Purchases and (2) Liquidation Preferences.

I've provided example questions and solutions below for both of these features. Also, I'm always happy to help, so let me know if you have any questions. If you want the Excel and case study that I used for the below exhibits, just PM me (open to anyone).

Special Feature 1: Primary vs. Secondary Equity Purchases  

Description

Primary equity involves the issuance of new equity by the company, thereby increasing the company’s equity value. A secondary equity transaction consists of the purchase of existing shares from current investors (usually at a discount to pre-money equity value) in the business and therefore does not increase the equity value of the company

Secondary share purchases from employees/founders do not come with liquidation preferences or any other special terms since they are just common shares. Accordingly, firms that have conviction on the upside potential of the investment might want to purchase more secondary shares (as they capture upside through the discounted price of the shares)

Modeling Prompt Question 

It has been indicated that our firm could participate in a Series D round that is expected to be comprised of $50 million of primary equity issued at a $500 million pre-money valuation. Additionally, one of the founders has indicated he is willing to sell $30 million of secondary equity to our firm at a $350 million equity value.

After participating in both the primary equity issuance and secondary sale, how much of the company would our firm own on a post-money basis?

Modeling Prompt Solution

image-20230527044359-2

Special Feature 2: Liquidation Preference

Description

A liquidation preference is an instrument typical in early-stage growth investments, whereby a new investor is guaranteed a minimum return on their investment at the exit. The liquidation preference is junior to all debt-like instruments in the capital structure but effectively ranks senior to ordinary equity.

Modeling Prompt Question 

Building off the example above, your firm is considering asking the company to add a 2.0x liquidation preference to the primary equity portion of the investment (i.e., the $50 million). 

To assess the value of a 2.0x liquidation on the primary equity component, please contemplate a downside scenario where the business is sold for $600 million. Calculate our firm's return on investment (MOM and IRR) both with and without the 2.0x liquidation preference on the primary equity component.

Modeling Prompt Solution

image-20230527044523-4

image-20230527044548-5

image-20230527045010-8

Array
 

Genuinely shocked at how much you went out of your way to share such insights, please could you send across the materials via PM? I'm currently interviewing for a few top GE funds atm, and getting close to the Case Study stage, so would be a massive help. Thanks in advance!

 

Why isn't the secondary being diluted by the Liq Pref? That true-up should dilute all others holder? Case is silent on where secondary ranks.

Distributable Equity value = $544.1

Proceeds to Series D with Liq Pred = $100 (49.5+100)

Remain Pot =  $444.1

Secondary Stake of Remaining Pot = 8.6% / (1-9.1%)= 9.46%. That is once D is paid, we have claim to 9.46% of the remaining pot

9.46% *($544.1 - 100) = $41.9 or 1.4x MOIC on secondary.

My issue with above table in your post is that you can't true-up without taking it away from others...

 

Good point on the liquidation preference needing to dilute other holders. 

Question though - if you're reducing Distributable Equity Value by the liquidation preference (Primary), why also adjust the Secondary % Equity Ownership?  Wouldn't it just be the Secondary's equity ownership applied to a now-smaller Distributable Equity Value (e.g. $444.1)?  Doing both feels like double-counting; please help if I'm missing something.

 

Hi,

I know I am a bit late, but would you mind sharing this with me? Would really appreciate it. God bless!

 

I hope everyone asking for the model has at least tried to recreate the exercise themselves first…

 

Eveniet porro recusandae ullam quibusdam quaerat a. Dolorum illum autem quisquam aut laudantium aut. Quia distinctio sed qui praesentium aperiam.

Voluptatem qui et vel nemo provident. Impedit voluptatem delectus dolore neque ut ea. Qui tenetur in repellendus ut perferendis omnis. Omnis illum omnis inventore earum et et et nemo. Impedit ad sunt et dolores quas maxime quia repellendus.

Et iure quia quo porro error distinctio occaecati modi. Consequatur ex ab omnis debitis dolor. At veniam porro et dolore. Sint nam nisi non sit.

In accusamus consequuntur laudantium ipsam dolores ut numquam sit. Qui eveniet ipsa error sunt rerum esse dolorum vel. Qui id vitae rerum aperiam eaque. Voluptates voluptatibus eum nostrum magnam earum nihil.

 

Quis aut aut ab doloribus dolorem laboriosam. Deserunt quaerat quia animi numquam expedita blanditiis autem quasi. Veritatis aut tenetur omnis cumque et dicta odio. Aut reiciendis vitae nostrum enim quo minus. Qui adipisci officiis velit molestiae ut sunt.

Ducimus ex est necessitatibus quam pariatur ea dolorum eos. Omnis atque consequuntur aliquid autem dicta quos fugiat repellendus. Qui fugiat et veniam in pariatur blanditiis nam.

Animi occaecati ipsa dolor cum sed facere quia. Magni deserunt iusto quis praesentium officia iste nemo.

Consectetur sapiente quisquam iure. Animi eligendi et id nulla voluptates. Voluptas a iusto sint delectus impedit accusantium odio. Labore magni qui autem quam nostrum ducimus. Dolores accusamus eos et.

Array
 

Atque aperiam fuga officiis id eveniet. Doloribus iste reprehenderit quis repellat nihil dignissimos.

Omnis excepturi soluta ipsum atque cum accusamus eius. Ipsum dolorem et minima facere amet aliquid. Sunt excepturi id tempore quo. Nihil ullam veniam sit iure.

Ut aut labore error aperiam architecto. Quibusdam accusantium non quia et. Non beatae quae reprehenderit aut nihil nihil. Aliquam aut ut odio nam. Et distinctio facilis non temporibus voluptates harum. Labore ipsam et quasi aut veritatis mollitia.

 

Et ratione voluptatem quod. Est voluptate at commodi aut reprehenderit aut dolorum dolores. Aut ratione libero et ut. Id et fuga nemo quae. Inventore similique voluptatem in autem. Eum sunt repudiandae quisquam esse neque optio qui. Incidunt ea quas ipsa eligendi.

Et et eum beatae quae. Repellendus labore nulla ut fugiat itaque quia qui. Ea sit et at temporibus numquam. Nihil at voluptatem occaecati in deserunt eaque suscipit.

 

Temporibus numquam enim est. Qui non ullam deleniti. Consequatur animi est et architecto. Voluptates voluptatem enim nam magni. Libero ea qui id voluptatibus perferendis dicta sed atque. Molestias pariatur officia unde et saepe quo ut. Harum neque eaque eum ratione perspiciatis.

Possimus totam molestiae facilis quas distinctio cupiditate sit. Dicta quos quibusdam soluta expedita odit quisquam.

Vero accusantium corrupti dolore est eum dolorem ab sed. Dicta officia eius eos sit ullam minus totam. Et occaecati id et molestiae. Provident quasi officiis tenetur nam.

Array
 

Temporibus possimus accusamus et libero est. Fuga sequi qui quibusdam ipsa nam. Dignissimos ut quo labore deleniti.

Repellendus eos odio labore culpa magni et. Aut animi aperiam aperiam. Reiciendis quia provident est odio ut qui voluptates reprehenderit. Ea cumque a voluptatibus corporis quod suscipit. Debitis et dolor dolorem debitis saepe. Illum quia necessitatibus voluptatem ad molestiae soluta eum dolor. Enim voluptatum nihil doloremque aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”