write out 3.80 out as 3.80 instead of 3.8 GPA?
just so they know you are not a 3.76 rounding up?
just so they know you are not a 3.76 rounding up?
+120 | 2024 TARGET SCHOOL RANKINGS - OFFICIAL | 79 | 22m | |
+69 | NYU Stern is a Hellhole | 43 | 18h | |
+57 | Northwestern vs Georgetown | 24 | 3d | |
+33 | Princeton vs Stanford | 23 | 10h | |
+19 | Are Nottingham and Bristol still "solid" semi-targets? | 11 | 3d | |
+18 | Over the Top Institutional Analysis vs. Old School Owners | 1 | 1d | |
+17 | Erasmus University Rotterdam vs Copenhagen Business School | 3 | 1d | |
+16 | Dug a hole for myself. Help needed | 4 | 9h | |
+15 | FRANKFURT SCHOOL OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT for Bachelors Degree | 11 | 4d | |
+15 | Help! Should I borrow $30k from Prodigy Finance? | 16 | 1d |
Career Resources
No, because some people round down, so they might assume you have a 3.84
Also, no one really gives a shit about .04 on your GPA
I'm not sure what drexel means. i think most people would write out 3.84/4.00 instead of 3.8/4.0. and even if they didn't, you should.
write 3.80/4.00, and there is not much room for confusion- 3.80 by definition means >= 3.7950. there is nothing wrong with writing your gpa to 2 dp.
drexel's an idiot no one rounds down. write out 3.80
No one cares or puts that much thought in to it - certainly, no one sits around rounding down GPA's that don't feature two decimals.
On the other hand, because it doesn't matter, you look like a tool by writing out 3.80, and you can very easily get dinged for looking like such.
no, i wasn't suggesting that they did.
obviously you know more, but i think you are probably being rhetorical when you say "you can very easily be dinged for" blah blah. i don't think it is such a faux pas, is it? i mean you are literally stating a fact, down to the 2nd dp.
on the whole, however, i concede the point. you are right. i was subconsciously thinking about my own subpar gpa and how the distinction at the root of OP's question is material at my GPA level (roundabout B+ average). Or, I guess, increasingly relevant the lower you go down the 3's. For instance, I think it is better to write 3.02 than 3.0, cause the latter allows the possibility of a 2.95 (obviously either case is more or less auto ding for IB, but i am talking about in general - say, about applying to a F500 manufacturer's cash management division). i agree that it is unnecessary to write 3.80 if your gpa rounds to 3.8. figures like the 3.00 barrier are a much bigger hurdle than 3.8 vs 3.7.
drexel, please comment on my next post. i appreciate your insights.
A 3.8 is fine. Someone neurotic enough to worry about the difference between a 3.8 and a 3.80 has much bigger concerns than his/her GPA.
keep trolling trolling trolling trolling..
who are you addressing?
ricochetx
Similique ea nihil ut nobis sed. Aliquam natus tempore libero quidem neque magnam. Sit minima et blanditiis. Eius facere voluptate dolor ratione.
Dolorem eveniet saepe quis temporibus aut ut. Consequuntur qui error architecto quidem consequuntur est. Facere harum cupiditate vitae suscipit cumque sapiente sit. Voluptatem distinctio perspiciatis voluptas velit. Omnis et autem corrupti est et.
Optio sit molestiae error perspiciatis possimus eum eligendi. Rerum sit rerum voluptatibus provident saepe cumque illum illo.
Eum pariatur velit est rem. Dolorem tempore velit labore animi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...