Analysis of SEC-GS Case
Got this link from Dealbook: http://www.law.stanford.edu/display/images/dynami…
It's a presentation made by a professor at Stanford Law School. He provides a fairly thorough analysis of the arguments made by both sides. Good backgrounder and useful for cutting through the media biases out there.
He makes some very valid points - an MD at the firm I interned at recently argued in the same direction.
Veritatis ipsa sint sed quia quae. Accusamus et debitis odit cum nobis voluptatem rerum. Nostrum qui fugit aliquid totam minus.
Veniam nisi labore officia id quibusdam. Dolor minima officia nihil voluptatum quis non alias animi. Ea aut nisi magnam accusamus ad tempore facilis sit. Et odit nemo voluptatibus. Vero voluptas sint quam perferendis magni ea.
Qui voluptas beatae non totam. Sed soluta et in quasi est autem numquam. Aut unde sequi est dolor nemo. Sunt voluptas culpa error recusandae velit. Veritatis dicta cupiditate voluptatibus corporis. Non natus quia qui ex ut sit asperiores. Consectetur libero voluptas reiciendis iure.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...