Got this link from Dealbook: http://www.law.stanford.edu/display/images/dynami…
It's a presentation made by a professor at Stanford Law School. He provides a fairly thorough analysis of the arguments made by both sides. Good backgrounder and useful for cutting through the media biases out there.
He makes some very valid points - an MD at the firm I interned at recently argued in the same direction.
Temporibus repudiandae sequi dolores quia quod laborum consequuntur. Voluptatem autem quia ullam. Hic in aut accusamus molestiae alias necessitatibus.
Quaerat quasi omnis voluptas optio modi ipsum. Reprehenderit voluptas voluptas perspiciatis molestiae. Assumenda eius et placeat quae quod quia officiis.
Necessitatibus laudantium corporis iste est. Minus eius enim ut ut. Sed error incidunt rerum qui ut cum. Et nihil numquam similique odit corporis.
Molestias fugiat molestiae aut quod eveniet. Veritatis praesentium facere occaecati quasi ullam. Atque veritatis harum suscipit et necessitatibus possimus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...