Got this link from Dealbook: http://www.law.stanford.edu/display/images/dynami…
It's a presentation made by a professor at Stanford Law School. He provides a fairly thorough analysis of the arguments made by both sides. Good backgrounder and useful for cutting through the media biases out there.
| +121 | Do people still want to go PE? | 36 | 21h |
| +101 | UBS Tech layoff | 44 | 33m |
| +70 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 14 | 1h |
| +37 | Lazard hirevue | 11 | 2d |
| +36 | What Differentiates the Best Analysts as AI Improves? | 9 | 2d |
| +35 | How do YOU manage networking requests? | 7 | 7h |
| +32 | MBB Pay Raises | 14 | 8m |
| +31 | Quitting After First 4 months | 10 | 1d |
| +26 | Cornell Club T10 Rankings (UPDATED 10/2026) | 17 | 1h |
| +26 | Are target prospects getting dumber? | 11 | 17h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
He makes some very valid points - an MD at the firm I interned at recently argued in the same direction.
Unde eveniet reiciendis neque sed omnis aut. Odio hic est animi itaque officiis nisi autem explicabo. Culpa porro officiis reprehenderit. Exercitationem est quia delectus explicabo magni. Aut optio eligendi temporibus ea et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...