Are EV multiples a mini DCF....a market's view on the intrinsic value of the company?

The way I see ev/ebitda multiple for example, is a shortened mini-dcf. The EQUITY in the EV is the market's view (assumptions) on growth, capex and discount rate, all represented in a DCF. Else, how would a market value a company. The idea that DCF is an intrinsic way of valuing a company and trading multiples are not, is flawed I think. Both the DCF and trading multiples are trying to answer the same thing: i.e. what the intrinsic value of a company and thus they are both intrinsic methods but sometimes using different assumptions than your own. The thought you can value a company based just on a random multiple is fuckin insane. What justifies that trading multiple, whats behind it? my answer would be a mini dcf, a shortened version of it, reduced to a simple multiple number. At the end of the day, when you're doing a football field and comparing the ev/ebitda through different valuation methods, you're reducing your own DCF to an EV/EBITDA multiple, or other multiples.

 
Best Response

Look at it in terms of M&A. What does an M&A professionals do?

They make markets on highly illiquid assets. In this case those assets are companies. Making markets with no benchmarks would be near impossible. So, we use the public markets as a benchmark. This is about as accurate as you can get, because the public markets are updated on a second-to-second basis, integrating all available information. If you believe that markets are even mildly efficient, this is the way to go.

This is not to say that multiples will take the place of DCF. They are generally used in tandem.

Array
 

Blanditiis accusantium odit est dignissimos. Eveniet itaque sed impedit rem. Error doloremque est in libero.

Libero ipsa aut voluptas rerum iste accusantium. Officia amet vel voluptatum adipisci.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”