Are EV multiples a mini DCF....a market's view on the intrinsic value of the company?

The way I see ev/ebitda multiple for example, is a shortened mini-dcf. The EQUITY in the EV is the market's view (assumptions) on growth, capex and discount rate, all represented in a DCF. Else, how would a market value a company. The idea that DCF is an intrinsic way of valuing a company and trading multiples are not, is flawed I think. Both the DCF and trading multiples are trying to answer the same thing: i.e. what the intrinsic value of a company and thus they are both intrinsic methods but sometimes using different assumptions than your own. The thought you can value a company based just on a random multiple is fuckin insane. What justifies that trading multiple, whats behind it? my answer would be a mini dcf, a shortened version of it, reduced to a simple multiple number. At the end of the day, when you're doing a football field and comparing the ev/ebitda through different valuation methods, you're reducing your own DCF to an EV/EBITDA multiple, or other multiples.

3 Comments
 
Best Response

Look at it in terms of M&A. What does an M&A professionals do?

They make markets on highly illiquid assets. In this case those assets are companies. Making markets with no benchmarks would be near impossible. So, we use the public markets as a benchmark. This is about as accurate as you can get, because the public markets are updated on a second-to-second basis, integrating all available information. If you believe that markets are even mildly efficient, this is the way to go.

This is not to say that multiples will take the place of DCF. They are generally used in tandem.

Array
 

Quo consequatur quia veritatis ut quasi in. Occaecati tenetur at est veniam. Quaerat temporibus est placeat nemo at cumque. Quia at ut cumque velit odio et.

Ea sint adipisci ipsam. Est repellendus a quod sunt impedit. Aut harum facilis exercitationem voluptatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”